Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SLOT INFO GACOR

Channel

SLOT INFO GACOR

@gacor_situs_link

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

37,137subscribers

-3,909 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965868849
TypeChannel
Username@gacor_situs_link
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/gacor_situs_link

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

25.1 average views per post against 37,137 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.068%. Across the 306 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,632–99,465 subscribers, posting mainly in Indonesian — the middle half sit between 0.828% and 6.35%, with a median of 2.22%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (2 October 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Posts measured38 of 38 published in the window (38 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled953
Mature posts only0.069% over 37 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers37,137 measured 31 October 2026
Cohortb31623:ind · 306 channels · p10 0.436% · p25 0.828% · p50 2.22% · p75 6.35% · p90 9.21%
Position in cohort0.000th percentile · 1/33 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.078% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageIndonesian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 1 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

37,13741,04639,091.526 August 2026 — 41,046 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,046 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,975 subscribers29 August 2026 — 40,925 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40,881 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40,796 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,712 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,618 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,563 subscribers5 September 2026 — 40,472 subscribers8 September 2026 — 40,249 subscribers11 September 2026 — 40,074 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,950 subscribers14 September 2026 — 39,873 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,823 subscribers18 September 2026 — 39,703 subscribers2 October 2026 — 38,957 subscribers7 October 2026 — 38,629 subscribers11 October 2026 — 38,346 subscribers14 October 2026 — 38,207 subscribers15 October 2026 — 38,140 subscribers16 October 2026 — 38,091 subscribers17 October 2026 — 38,042 subscribers18 October 2026 — 37,965 subscribers19 October 2026 — 37,929 subscribers20 October 2026 — 37,858 subscribers21 October 2026 — 37,768 subscribers22 October 2026 — 37,692 subscribers23 October 2026 — 37,627 subscribers24 October 2026 — 37,554 subscribers25 October 2026 — 37,500 subscribers26 October 2026 — 37,460 subscribers27 October 2026 — 37,386 subscribers28 October 2026 — 37,326 subscribers29 October 2026 — 37,288 subscribers30 October 2026 — 37,194 subscribers31 October 2026 — 37,137 subscribers26 August 202631 October 2026
37 measurements spanning 66 days, net -3,909. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,551–41,632 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 15:5537,137-57
30 Oct 2026, 15:3037,194-94
29 Oct 2026, 12:0837,288-38
28 Oct 2026, 13:5637,326-60
27 Oct 2026, 14:0737,386-74
26 Oct 2026, 15:2937,460-40
25 Oct 2026, 16:1737,500-54
24 Oct 2026, 14:0537,554-73
23 Oct 2026, 15:2537,627-65
22 Oct 2026, 18:4137,692-76
21 Oct 2026, 14:1837,768-90
20 Oct 2026, 10:3537,858-71
19 Oct 2026, 08:0937,929-36
18 Oct 2026, 11:1037,965-77
17 Oct 2026, 10:5538,042-49
16 Oct 2026, 08:5938,091-49
15 Oct 2026, 05:4738,140-67
14 Oct 2026, 03:1738,207-139
11 Oct 2026, 20:4038,346-283
7 Oct 2026, 06:1438,629first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 121 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.068%
avg views ÷ 37,137 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.1
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held96 (11 August 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total953
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Oct 2026, 22:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈60,900
Videos
≈6,670
Links
≈8,840

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Oct 2026, 15:52 UTC6 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Jepe besar itu nyata di KODE4D 💥 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Situs paling gacor cuma di KODE4D 😎👍

30 Oct 2026, 18:14 UTC7 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

KODE4D paling mantap bosku 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Yang main di KODE4D langsung puas, situs tua yang sudah melegenda 👍

30 Oct 2026, 17:20 UTC8 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Main di KODE4D jelas betah 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 KODE4D situs gacor No.1 😎💯

29 Oct 2026, 16:42 UTC13 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

KODE4D web pilihan tergacor 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Memberi bukti bukan janji kalau main di situs gacor KODE4D 😎💯

29 Oct 2026, 09:52 UTC14 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

KODE4D nih boss, situs paling gacor 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Main di KODE4D auto puas bossque 👍

29 Oct 2026, 07:41 UTC9 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Bukan sekedar omongan 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 KODE4D SITUS GACOR NO.1 👍

28 Oct 2026, 20:30 UTC12 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

KODE4D asli situs rekomen paling gacor bossku.. 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Cuma di KODE4D yang berani manjain dan ngasih gede.. main di situs yang sudah teruji bossku 👍

28 Oct 2026, 08:11 UTC11 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

KODE4D selalu paling gac0r 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Yang jelas jelas aja, di situs KODE4D auto puas bossque !!

27 Oct 2026, 19:49 UTC14 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Jepe besar itu nyata di KODE4D 💥 Däftar 7 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Situs paling gacor cuma di KODE4D 😎👍

26 Oct 2026, 19:03 UTC23 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

KODE4D paling mantap bosku 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/sawit188 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Yang main di KODE4D langsung puas, situs tua yang sudah melegenda 👍

25 Oct 2026, 10:05 UTC31 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

KODE4D web pilihan tergacor 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/testi138 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 Memberi bukti bukan janji kalau main di situs gacor KODE4D 😎💯

24 Oct 2026, 23:42 UTC29 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Pilih yang sudah terbukti 😎👍 Däftar 3 Linƙs Paling Gacør: 📌 https://rdct.cc/kode4d 🔥 📌 https://rdct.cc/testi138 📌 https://rdct.cc/kilat69 KODE4D situs paling gacors! 😎👍

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @gacor_situs_link. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

HOKA BASE.
@HokaBase · 119,713
#1
BASE MARAH HIRING INTERNS
@kemarahan · 56,884
#2
Satu Keyakinan Gaya Bebas.
@NayeonKims · 2,778
#3
[UFS] Boardboys. Ask Permission First!
@Boardboys · 5,185
#4
AESPA UPDATE #KISSNTELL
@aespaupdate4 · 36,610
#5

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HOKA BASE.
@HokaBase · 119,713
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 11 here — alongside 10 others — read 26 August 2026
OnTop™
@OnTopTM · 439,708
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 15 here — alongside 14 others — read 26 August 2026
KOMPETISI SAINS RUANGGURU 2026
@joinksr_2026 · 100,347
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 15 here — alongside 14 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SLOT INFO GACOR” (@gacor_situs_link), 37,137 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gacor_situs_link.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.