Channel
@fzxchaoping1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,625subscribers
+203 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002556440288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fzxchaoping1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fzxchaoping1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 2,625 | -28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 2,653 | +150 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 2,503 | +81 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 2,422 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 2,422 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,275 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-08 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【综合评分】：9.5 【狼友留名】：ck 【老师艺名】：优乐美 【水费】：600/p 【过程描述】：老师人比照片好看，身材很绝，前凸后翘，服务很用心，口活很棒，下面紧致水多，闭眼冲！ 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考，个人观点，请理性选择，切勿对号入座 注：提交报告需要约课记录
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-08 【人照评分】：10 【颜值评分】：10 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【综合评分】：10 【狼友留名】：Ember 【老师艺名】：依冉 【水费】：pp 【过程描述】：年少读曹植《洛神赋》，总以为“翩若惊鸿，婉若游龙”的绝美，只是文人笔下夸张的浪漫杜撰。那些极尽温柔又华丽的辞藻，缥缈遥远，仿佛只存在于书卷幻境之中，世间无人能够相配。直到遇见她，我才彻底读懂曹植落笔时满心震撼、落笔千言仍觉不足的心情，原来世间真的有这般惊艳世俗的容貌。 她的美从不需要修饰，素净天成，自带独特风骨。干净舒展的眉眼温柔动人，澄澈的眼眸藏着纯粹的温柔，简简单单的模样，便胜过世间所有浓妆艳抹的浮华。静立之时，她似皓月沉潭，温润恬淡，自带清雅脱俗的气质；抬眸浅笑、步履轻缓之际，又如清风拂柳、流云渡水，灵动温婉，一举一动皆是自然温柔的气韵，纯粹又动人。 洛神是古人心…
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-07 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【综合评分】：10 【狼友留名】：Jason 【老师艺名】：小玫瑰 【水费】：1600/p p 【过程描述】：【过程描述】：二刷了。小玫瑰现在比较火，前几天约了两次，都不巧没约上，今天刚好看到3点有空位，马上约了pp。鄙人也曾体验过当年的会所服务，说实话，出击了几十次，现在这些老师能让我复刷的几乎没有，小玫瑰是个例外，以后还会复刷。 先说情绪价值，小玫瑰一口一个哥哥，投喂各种水果，西瓜、蟠桃，甚至葡萄都是剥了皮喂到嘴边，准备了各种饮料、冰糕，不停的问你想吃啥喝啥，生怕你不好意思吃喝，这般温柔，谁能不爱。 再说床上功夫，那就更是销魂。服务就不赘述了，总之很顶。说几个戳我xp的点。①老师上次问我有啥建议，我建议弄个镜子，这次来了一看，硕大一个镜子，老师做服务的时候也可以欣…
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-06 【人照评分】：10 【颜值评分】：10 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【综合评分】：10 【狼友留名】：Ada 【老师艺名】：小玫瑰 【水费】：900/p 【过程描述】：服务体验彻底结束，独自坐在回家的车里，心潮依然久久不能平息。那种油然而生的情绪，大抵就是沦陷与爱上的感觉吧。终于切身体会到古人所说“牡丹花下死，做鬼也风流”的惬意与释怀——倘若牡丹都能得此盛誉，又何况是眼前这位风情万种的玫瑰。 早就听群里的兄弟们全五星口碑力荐“小玫瑰”，特意提前一天约好时段，准点打车赴约。 坐电梯上楼，门扉开启的瞬间，我就明白这一趟来对了。迎面是一双水灵灵、含情脉脉的大眼睛，清纯娇小的萝莉体型，瞬间引爆了内心深处的保护欲与原始冲动。 进门后，小玫瑰温声细语地问我要喝什么水、吃什么水果，贴心又自然的照顾，宛如小说里温柔贤惠的娇妻。饮水稍歇，她便…
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-06 【人照评分】：10 【颜值评分】：9 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【综合评分】：10 【狼友留名】：Justin 【老师艺名】：小玫瑰 【水费】：900/p 【过程描述】：二刷玫瑰。隔了十几天，天天都想着我的小宝贝。天天在复盘她的服务，梦里都是她的温柔和体贴。今天终于约到玫瑰头课，午休就溜出来出击。 玫瑰依旧穿着性格内衣迎接，她也依旧进门就给我大大的拥抱和亲吻。这次玫瑰主动给我洗水果吃，虽然我不吃水果，不过就是暖暖的感觉。 接下来当皇帝的感觉又来了。袜子鞋子衣服裤子都是玫瑰给我脱。还一边脱，偶尔三点口和舌吻。我们脱光就一起洗澡。应该说玫瑰给我洗澡。玫瑰开始给我a面擦肥皂我就知道，她会主动跪下来给我口活，容许我按着头深喉她。她真的不喊停不停的。我怎么猛攻她，她还是会一直用力给我深喉。 出来擦身体跪在我前面又忍不住给她喉咙桩基。…
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-06 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【服务评分】：9 【态度评分】：9 【综合评分】：8.75 【狼友留名】：小旺旺 【老师艺名】：兮析 【水费】：600/p（半价中奖） 【过程描述】：昨天中了半价券 今天就出击。一进门一眼惊艳1.7米的大个子太棒了 超级喜欢 立马交水费开始上课。洗个澡上床 ls开始给我做服务 看的出来ls是刚做的 很嫩 手法不是很娴熟 但是就冲嫩妹这个颜值身材完全没的说。ls很放得开，接着我也给ls舔，舔得很舒服。接着戴套开始cjs，然后换了几个姿势，搞了十几分钟 终于出货了。这一次出击太舒服了，喜欢嫩妹的强烈推荐，期待二刷。 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考，个人观点，请理性选择，切勿对号入座 注：提交报告需要约课记录
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-06 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【服务评分】：7 【态度评分】：9 【综合评分】：9 【狼友留名】：xiaoluoxiaoluo 【老师艺名】：白茶 【水费】：800/pp（半价中奖） 【过程描述】：嫩妹，刚下海。服务的话就是正常的嫩妹三件套。很小一只，个子不高，小巧的，明显感觉很生疏，纯纯的嫩妹，但是很有耐心，中间因为沟通问题，跑错地方了，ls也没有不耐烦，虽然会的姿势不多，但是非常听话，需求姿势都可以满足，我已经帮各位狼友军训过啦！值得出击 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考，个人观点，请理性选择，切勿对号入座 注：提交报告需要约课记录
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-06 【人照评分】：10 【颜值评分】：10 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【综合评分】：10 【狼友留名】：Gary 【老师艺名】：小玫瑰 【水费】：1600/pp 【过程描述】：前一阵注意到群里“大嫂”的推荐，可惜刚注意到就红休了，看到重新开了就立马约了，因为是zl所以可能没有dl回复那么及时，当天会提前再确认时间和项目。 空了就让提早上楼了，不会到点了才让上。过程ly们都说的很详细了，印象最深的三点：1. 真人比照片好看，完全人照无差，第一眼对人和穿搭的整体感觉真的很惊艳2. 情绪价值和细节真的很足，能给人哄成胚胎，有求必应，只有想不到没有做不到 3. 口真的很厉害，特别是深h和dl 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考，个人观点，请理性选择，切勿对号入座 注：提交报告需要约课记录
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-05 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【服务评分】：9.5 【态度评分】：9.5 【综合评分】：9.25 【狼友留名】：You 【老师艺名】：安玥 【水费】：1000/p 【过程描述】：心心念念老师好久了，刚好老师有空就过去了，打开门一看，身材完美，模样甜美，皮肤白嫩，两条腿比例很完美，迫不及待交了水费，和老师一起沐浴，看到老师诱惑的身材，还有精致的妆容，赶紧催老师快点洗完到床上，到了床上老师正常服务，从背面开始身体慢慢在我身上蠕动。酥酥麻麻，舌头舔满我的背面，有纯舌头毒龙老师口得很认真，没有齿感，后面叫老师69，二弟硬的受不了了，直接戴上小雨伞插了进去，老师小穴很暖很紧，会夹会吸，水特别多，老师很配合，就是女上受不了，后面坚持换了两个姿势出货，总体体验感棒推荐！ 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考，个人观点，请理性选择，切勿对号入座 注：提交报告需…
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-05 【人照评分】：8 【颜值评分】：8 【服务评分】：7 【态度评分】：9 【综合评分】：7 【狼友留名】：老工兵 【老师艺名】：白茶 【水费】：半价500/p 【过程描述】：在周浦万达的公寓里，没有楼禁和门禁，比较方便，地铁上来就是。 Ls 比较瘦小，155 左右，感觉不到 80 斤，胸 A，皮肤正常色偏暗。人照基本一致，照片去掉磨皮和美白就是了，有点小卡粉。 没要 YYY，应该有六九，换了六九的姿势，但不是很想舔就没试。嫩妹三件套外加一二三简单出货。 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考，个人观点，请理性选择，切勿对号入座 注：提交报告需要约课记录
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-05 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【服务评分】：9 【态度评分】：10 【综合评分】：10 【狼友留名】：暴富小子 【老师艺名】：小玫瑰 【水费】：900/p 【过程描述】：第一次写报告，实在是夯爆了，颜值跟照片视频一样好看，又嫩身材又好，服务顶级，舔的我浑身酥麻，换了好几个姿势都非常配合，最后女上结束，我不信有人来第一次不来第二次👍 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考，个人观点，请理性选择，切勿对号入座 注：提交报告需要约课记录
福利群：https://t.me/fzxch01 【时间】：2026-08-05 【人照评分】：9 【颜值评分】：9 【服务评分】：10 【态度评分】：10 【综合评分】：9.5 【狼友留名】：Lucius 【老师艺名】：素素 【水费】：2300/包时 【过程描述】：第一次来，之前一直在频道中关注，最近终于时间空闲来体验下。进门后就见一身黑色小裙子迎面而来，我本身比较内向，素素给人的感觉真的很舒服，嘘寒问暖带到了沙发上，主动贴近让我很安心，缓解了我紧张的情绪，怕我过来热，让我挑选冰箱里的饮料。洗好后在床上静候，素素开始洗漱，出来后身着qqny就贴近怀里，大蟒蛇就开始了，有一说一，ls的唇十分让我着迷。做的过程全程主动配合，不催不事。趁素素做饭写下了此报告，第一次写，写得不好ly见谅。温柔女友感满满，只能说不虚此行！ 【温馨提醒】：报告仅供参考，个人观点，请理性选择，切勿对号入座 注：提交报告需要约课记录
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @fzxchaoping1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 242,040 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海风子修车报告频道” (@fzxchaoping1), 2,625 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fzxchaoping1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.