📋 举报信息确认 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📛 骗子昵称:小新同学,多寶 👤 骗子用户名: @Xxtx90211 @duobao08 🎯 骗子ID:6850197388 6460966067 💳 骗子地址:TKDHrNEBpR3ceBEXt2g5StUeWNtP4hWjs6 💰 交易金额:3523.00📝 📝 事件描述:骗子地址:TKDHrNEBpR3ceBEXt2g5StUeWNtP4hWjs6 交易金额:3523U 事件描述:因为以前合作过的信任,先号后款拖几天后面不打算结算,各大中介号商多多注意 📸 证据图片:7 张 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🙋 举报人用户名:@feitu8888 ━━━━━━━━━━━━

Channel
凤舞九天曝光频道
@fwjt6666
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17,823subscribers
-2,435 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001245433280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fwjt6666 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fwjt6666 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 17,823 | -1,224 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 19,047 | -804 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 19,851 | -450 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 20,301 | -339 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 20,640 | -21 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 20,661 | +136 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 20,525 | +59 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:23 | 20,466 | +44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:23 | 20,422 | +23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:05 | 20,399 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 20,398 | +51 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 20,347 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 20,346 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 20,345 | +26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 20,319 | +55 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 20,264 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 20,263 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 20,264 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 20,260 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 20,259 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
骗子昵称:鹏飞 瞬发 骗子用户名:@SMS7288 骗子地址: TKoHrYJtG7PENCyDpA5tWxSqbQLdiC9BXp TVYTj4KWYsRUivxsJguLtSQSKuzYr9f3e9 骗子群:https://t.me/SF888988 交易金额:256u 事件描述:收我246u,发5000条巴西,第一天说堵量,第二天:说涨价到540u,我没答应,说能发发不能发就给我退了,第三天直接拉黑跑路,现在已经隐藏id 举报人用户名:@yudiooo
熟人挂账994u,一直拖着,刚过完年说没开工,后面说没客户,一直拖半年了,7月份问他说月底还一些,到现在8月了一分没结,还是说以没客户为由闭口不谈结账的事情 @y0688 对方地址 THhkkk8R5HST7m2h4VP4o42cXHQmfwkwu2
事情经过:书生,在5.10号之前合作正常结算,期间我们被别人跑了17000u跟书生发的链接有关让他帮忙查找一下沫子是哪家公司的,6.9号私聊说给别人那么高后付,不给他,让他开后付给送量,发了400万,总计2万u,发完事后以生病推脱以及各种事情不结算,到今天群里说算账开始,先把自己两个人踢了,拉了字母进来,进来就是还装还不认,原因是因为有人在6.9号跑路字母94u,发的我们地址,我们地址用了很久,从来没做过骗u等手段,我们说你们认准我们地址可以,我们经得起排查,书生这边说曝光等不配合考察,根据事情原委了解到当时有在青木堂曝光,确实有我们地址,后面撤销掉了,我们去沟通是说被骗了94u,我们又去排查确实有跟我们有地址转账,原因是一个叫小老弟跟我们对接,沟通后说开后台给客户价格0.0047,让我们反1u给他,全部聊天记录已经截图,可以证明这个小老弟是个中介拿我们地址直接去收款了,我们经得起自证,这件事跟我们没有关系,硬要拿这个当借口不结…
📛 骗子昵称:七七🔥全球Ws群发 Rcs Tg群发 一手机房 👤 骗子用户名:@qiqi567881 @hfjf65 🎯 骗子ID:@hfjf65 💳 骗子地址:TSCy847PFemDTmPdCBn8akW2z8PPLZTVFG TXWtRBLHqJrJPMfwRGQBCSbXkRsyuB4fNL TT8HzpBFwjQCCbWFAhfTjTVLVN5jSKsfCC TTGrvgp5uDU59TPX4TTHeFTdsJXGjdNLQg TMcX4NNVNaWiUnemJgcrNPfkSWdFf4d2oc TVmAFRkqBmEjSPQkpnkuV6oNcf3HgESsZc TKKvXsYxcPQ6fzLwourbFi4wXBCf2CgRhj TPyiQrP19oaLu5bQcn1UJDuRqvZAJvYqjQ TLWZnP54sEjjDS4Xp5Spi6nNaAnyKqLvcC TVey6D8TiQNWQ4SfCDs25B…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @fwjt6666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@fwjt6666 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“凤舞九天曝光频道” (@fwjt6666), 17,823 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fwjt6666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.