👨🚀 Автор готов обсудить свой сигнал по #AAVEUSDT.
Channel
@feuturespda_bot
@futurespda498
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001654316313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @futurespda498 |
| Description | @feuturespda_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 25 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/futurespda498 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 69
- Links
- 162
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
26.07 в 17:00 (МСК) на YouTube-канале CScalp TV выходит обучающее видео: "+20% Пробой наклонного уровня. Разбор скальперских сделок" В видео трейдер разберет несколько сделок. Ситуации: пробой наклонных и горизонтальных уровней. Основания: раскорреляция с BTC, активность в стакане, объемы, уровни. Идеи для сделок трейдер брал в канале Trader signals. Хотите научиться отрабатывать сигналы? Смотрите обучающее видео зд…
SHORT #AUDIOUSDT from $0.3065 stop loss $0.31 30m TF. На монете появился участник на что указывают повышенные объёмы + в прошлом монета очень импульсно шла вниз. Образовались 2 чётких минимума на пробой которых и стоит входить с целью на импульс Автор: BREIDO Trade #ПробойУровня
👨🚀 Автор готов обсудить свой сигнал по #AUDIOUSDT.
👨🚀 Автор готов обсудить свой сигнал по #BATUSDT.
SHORT #BTSUSDT from $0.0105 stop loss $0.0107 15m TF. Монета впервые будет ретестить свой недавно пробитый уровень, на отметке 0.01063 стоит плотность, от которой ожидаю реакцию в шорт Сигналы МосБиржи здесь. #ОтскокОтУровня
👨🚀 Автор готов обсудить свой сигнал по #BTSUSDT.
SHORT #BTCUSDT from $20 750 stop loss $21 500 4h TF. Ситуация на обновление минимума + слом трендовой линии. В связи с ростом доминации BTC и явным упадком объемов, стоит ожидать плавное закругление цены вниз. Автор: Market Situations #ПробойУровня
👨🚀 Автор готов обсудить свой сигнал по #BTCUSDT.
👨🚀 Автор готов обсудить свой сигнал по #BTCUSDT.
👨🚀 Автор готов обсудить свой сигнал по #LEVERBUSD.
SHORT #LEVERBUSD from $0.00267 stop loss $0.268 5m TF. Сформировался локальный уровень , рассматриваю на пробой в шорт. На графике инструмента видна явная сила продавца , ожидаю импульсный пробой с основной целью 0.002600$ Автор: Запильный Скальпинг #ПробойУровня
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @futurespda498. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@futurespda498 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@feuturespda_bot” (@futurespda498), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/futurespda498.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.