Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 福利吧fuliba.net

Channel

福利吧fuliba.net

@fulibas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,607subscribers

+298 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001229274633
TypeChannel
Username@fulibas
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fulibas

Growth

26,29426,60726,450.56 August 2026 — 26,309 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,308 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,296 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,294 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,315 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,336 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,346 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,357 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,370 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,376 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,386 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,395 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,427 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,426 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,431 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,450 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,461 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,479 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,495 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,502 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,525 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,540 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,553 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,554 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,568 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,578 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,580 subscribers7 September 2026 — 26,607 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 32 days, net +298. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,247–26,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 04:4126,607+27
4 Sept 2026, 11:2026,580+2
3 Sept 2026, 01:0726,578+10
1 Sept 2026, 23:5526,568+14
31 Aug 2026, 20:4426,554+1
30 Aug 2026, 18:3626,553+13
29 Aug 2026, 21:5526,540+15
28 Aug 2026, 21:0526,525+23
27 Aug 2026, 19:0426,502+7
26 Aug 2026, 17:3426,495+16
25 Aug 2026, 19:5526,479+18
24 Aug 2026, 22:2526,461+11
23 Aug 2026, 09:3926,450+19
21 Aug 2026, 21:3526,431+5
20 Aug 2026, 18:0526,426-1
19 Aug 2026, 21:2426,427+32
18 Aug 2026, 22:1526,395+9
17 Aug 2026, 19:1626,386+10
16 Aug 2026, 19:4826,376+6
15 Aug 2026, 07:4226,370first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.71%
avg views ÷ 26,607 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,780
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
41.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held78 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total83,857
Reactions total14,059
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

14,065 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎7,04850.1%
💔7,00449.8%
90.064%
👍30.021%
🤣10.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC937 views1,001 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 怀旧剧场:中国台湾行走纪录片《八千里路云和月》 30年前真实中国影像 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

💔531👎470

2 Sept 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,040 views1,003 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 黄果短剧媒体流解析 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

💔518👎485

2 Sept 2026, 00:34 UTC≈1,080 views1,002 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 2026年福利汇总第123期 :纯爱浪漫的人 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

👎555💔447

1 Sept 2026, 23:01 UTC≈2,160 views2,009 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 网易《CC直播》正式停止运营 附录CC主播舞蹈合集 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

👎1,030💔9781

1 Sept 2026, 09:42 UTC≈2,250 views1,000 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 くるくる:《被女扮男装的女人抢走女朋友后我决定报复她》 初恋来袭,剧情更复杂了 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

💔509👎491

31 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC≈1,860 views1,003 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 女菩萨:X (推特)博主精选画廊 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

💔521👎482

31 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,670 views1,009 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 近期热门电影《欢迎来龙餐馆》《给阿嬷的情书》高清流媒体版 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

👎520💔489

31 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC≈2,080 views2,006 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 2026年福利汇总第122期 :拿破仑 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

💔1,020👎986

31 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC≈1,530 views1,003 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 医解万物:用医学的视角解读恐怖电影《电锯惊魂》《死神来了》 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

👎504💔499

30 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,400 views1,000 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 AI加持,以图搜番号引擎 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

👎513💔487

29 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈2,920 views1,002 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 怀旧纪录片:《乡村里的中国》 从山东淄博小山村看真实农村 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

👎508💔4931

29 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC≈1,800 views1,016 reactionsread 3 September 2026

福利吧 2026年福利汇总第121期 :申请未成年仅退款 Telegraph | 原文 #福利吧 #fuliba #福利

💔512👎504

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @fulibas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“福利吧fuliba.net” (@fulibas), 26,607 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fulibas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.