Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ིྀf6kona

Channel

ིྀf6kona

@fukonaburmalda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003721109293
TypeChannel
Username@fukonaburmalda
Description@mehnem , список вп @fukonyamp
Created22 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
On Telegramt.me/fukonaburmalda

Growth

711910 August 2026 — 7 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11 subscribers10 August 202614 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 34 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 06:2211no change
10 Sept 2026, 18:3611+2
1 Sept 2026, 06:379+2
10 Aug 2026, 22:157first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
586.8%
avg views ÷ 11 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.5
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held12 (22 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total710
Reactions total74
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54180634052421578511114.9%
custom 54183514429288966091114.9%
custom 5231068792691398963912.2%
custom 5231357418788660094912.2%
custom 5417937743089014224912.2%
custom 5418331479920905195912.2%
custom 541576568793311506579.46%
custom 541807473107093269679.46%
custom 541585482997934265922.70%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC49 views8 reactionsread 14 September 2026

рест+дни от ОБЩЕНИЯ, я устал, отвечаю только ирл друзьям и изредко инет работать буду обычно😴

custom 54180634052421578513custom 52313574187886600942custom 54158548299793426592custom 54183514429288966091

29 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC69 views11 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52313574187886600942custom 54183314799209051952custom 54183514429288966092custom 52310687926913989631custom 54157656879331150651custom 54179377430890142241custom 54180634052421578511custom 54180747310709326961

29 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC68 views15 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🎁🤩⠀𝓵۟ׄ𖹭͜𐐷𝗲ׅ 𐑙ׅ𝘪ׄ𝗌t 🐏 🐏🤩 Sado 、Kiori 、Vilka 、Mumnya 、Tank.0 、Hesumi 、Fialka 、Bulgarian  порядок не имеет значения.

custom 54183514429288966094custom 52310687926913989633custom 54179377430890142243custom 52313574187886600941custom 54157656879331150651custom 54180634052421578511custom 54180747310709326961custom 54183314799209051951

29 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC67 views15 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54180634052421578514custom 54157656879331150653custom 54183314799209051953custom 52310687926913989631custom 52313574187886600941custom 54179377430890142241custom 54180747310709326961custom 54183514429288966091

29 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC67 views11 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🤔 𝔂ᦢ𝘂ׂ𝑟 𝓸‌⃔ᩚ𝑝𝗂ռ᪲ꪱ𑄈n 🎀

custom 52313574187886600942custom 54183314799209051952custom 54183514429288966092custom 52310687926913989631custom 54157656879331150651custom 54179377430890142241custom 54180634052421578511custom 54180747310709326961

29 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC65 views14 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🤩 dm 🤩 anon 🔪 shitpost 🥹 ruinene fans 🥹

custom 52310687926913989633custom 54179377430890142243custom 54180747310709326963custom 52313574187886600941custom 54157656879331150651custom 54180634052421578511custom 54183314799209051951custom 54183514429288966091

29 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC62 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🔵ㅤ໋ 𝖿𝓊𝗸𝒐᷼𝗇ִ𝖺 😻 ჩׄ𝗲ׅິ/ჩꪱm 📱 🎀🎀🎀 🎀 esfp

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @fukonaburmalda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ིྀf6kona” (@fukonaburmalda), 11 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fukonaburmalda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.