4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–98 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 16:02
97
+3
16 Aug 2026, 01:52
94
+4
9 Aug 2026, 14:30
90
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:11
90
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.4%
avg views ÷ 97 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (8 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
153
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
18
51.4%
🔥
12
34.3%
❤
5
14.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ловушка толщины пенопласта.
Ранее мы выяснили, что обычный пенопласт запирает влагу. Но им всё-таки можно утеплять фасады. Если не совершить самую частую ошибку, которая называется «ловушка толщины».
Многие застройщики рассуждают так: «Газоблок и сам по себе теплый. Накину сверху 5 сантиметров пенополистирола для верности, и хватит. Зачем переплачивать за толстый слой?»
И это самая дорогая ошибка. 5 сантиметров ут…
Пенополистирол vs Минвата. Главная ошибка выбора.
В прошлый раз мы выяснили: чтобы газоблок не промерзал и не разрушался, точку росы нужно сместить в слой утеплителя.
И вот тут многие совершают ошибку и покупают обычный дешевый пенопласт (пенополистирол). Логика простая: «Ну а что, он же теплый, зачем переплачивать за вату?»
Давайте вспомним физику. Газоблок, дышащий пористый материал. Пар из дома постоянно идет с…
Где же должна быть точка росы, чтобы стены не разрушались.❓
В прошлый раз мы разобрались, что пар всегда идет из теплого дома на холодную улицу. И там, где он встречается с морозом, выпадает конденсат, та самая точка росы.
Если дом построен из голого газоблока, то зимой этот стык тепла и холода находится прямо внутри камня. Блок намокает, промерзает и начинает разрушаться. А у вас под обоями радостно цветет черная …
Газоблок и точка росы: откуда в сухой стене берется вода💧
Строите из газоблока?
Отличный материал. Теплый, ровный, быстро укладывается. Но у него есть одна особенность, из-за которой можно запросто испортить свой дом.
Имя этой угрозе точка росы.
Откуда вообще берется вода внутри, казалось бы, сухой каменной стены?
Всё просто. Вы живете в доме. Варите пельмени, принимаете горячий душ, дышите, в конце концов. Внутри…
Из чего состоит гибкий кирпич FST. Часть 4 💥: Чистовой монтаж
Знаете, на чем чаще всего «сыпется» внешний вид дорогого фасада? На неаккуратной затирке швов.
В прошлой части мы разобрали фактуру: вмятины, шероховатости, объем. Это выглядит круто, но есть суровая строительная реальность. Если при затирке фасадный клей попадет в эти глубокие поры, вы его оттуда уже ничем не вымоете.
Испортить премиальный вид можно одни…
Очередная отгрузка более 3000м2 для клиента из Уфы💪 И это только малая часть из тех,кто выбирает нас. Сейчас мы производим порядка 11000-13000м2 в месяц. Для частных клиентов, застройщиков и коммерческих объектов. Дальше больше.
Из чего состоит гибкий кирпич FST. Часть 3: Эстетика и объем
Как мы добились того, чтобы гибкий фасад выглядел как эталонная кирпичная кладка, а не как плоские обои на стене? Секрет кроется в правильной геометрии и деталях.
1️⃣Первое - толщина материала.
Мы делаем кирпич толщиной 4–4.2 мм. За счет этого на фасаде получается настоящий, глубокий внутренний шов.
Именно он дает нужный 3D-эффект, объем и правильную тень…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fstklinker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FST-KLINKER 🧱” (@fstklinker), 97 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fstklinker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.