Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
23,400 average views per post against 9,595 subscribers — an engagement rate of 244.1%. Across the 39,232 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.97% and 25.6%, with a median of 13.8%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (17 July 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Posts measured
11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
257,610
Mature posts only
244.1% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,587–9,659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 09:14
9,595
-9
10 Aug 2026, 11:26
9,604
-43
7 Aug 2026, 04:06
9,647
-4
6 Aug 2026, 07:17
9,651
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
244.1%
avg views ÷ 9,595 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,400
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.058%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
13 (14 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
257,610
Reactions total
149
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
377
Videos
110
Links
402
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 25s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
171 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
43
25.1%
👍
36
21.1%
🤪
26
15.2%
😡
19
11.1%
👏
14
8.19%
🤔
13
7.60%
😱
8
4.68%
🤬
6
3.51%
😁
4
2.34%
✍
1
0.585%
😐
1
0.585%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Луговой о деле полковника Таразевича: расстрел за хищения в армии был бы правильным решением».
Первый заместитель председателя Комитета по безопасности и противодействию коррупции, депутат фракции ЛДПР Андрей Луговой прокомментировал дело полковника Таразевича и его подельников, обвиняемых в хищении 700 млн рублей на поставках мясных консервов для армии.
По словам парламентария, когда на фронте не хватает радиоста…
Жена вологодского губернатора Ирина Филимонова записала видео, в котором опровергла информацию об избиении ее мужем.
Видеообращение опубликовано в канале главы области.
Ранее в соцсетях начали распространять информацию о том, что женщина якобы находится в реанимации одной из больниц Ярославля, после избиения мужем.
Видео: Официальный канал губернатора Вологодской области Георгия Филимонова.
Главный силовой канал …
Жена вологодского губернатора могла попасть в реанимацию.
В сети распространяется информация о якобы произошедшем семейном конфликте с участием губернатора Вологодской области Георгия Филимонова.
По неподтверждённым данным, его супруга находится в реанимационном отделении одной из больниц Ярославля. Ряд источников утверждает, что женщина могла получить тяжёлые травмы в результате конфликта с мужем.
На данный момен…
Шемякин суд: когда закон — пустой звук.
В русском языке есть выражение «шемякин суд». Это когда правосудие выносит приговор, который любой нормальный человек назовёт абсурдным. Когда судья не ищет истину, а преследует свои цели.
Судья Шемяка в XVI веке вершил правосудие по принципу «лишь бы посадить». Его слово было последним. Он никому не присягал, не клялся в верности закону. Просто судил, как хотел.
Судья Натал…
ФСК: за разговоры о мобилизации могут взяться всерьёз.
По информации, распространяющейся в ряде источников, в силовых структурах якобы начались проверки после публикации The Wall Street Journal о возможной новой волне мобилизации после выборов 2026 года. Официального подтверждения этим сведениям на данный момент нет.
Как утверждают авторы публикаций, внимание контрразведки сосредоточено не только на возможных источ…
Никита Щукин — главный развратник г. Пласт и всей Челябинской области хочет пить чай с ВСУ.
Житель г. Пласт Челябинской области Никита Щукин хорошо известен в г. Пласт, самом Челябинске и других городах. Свою известность получил благодаря своим выходкам, нетрадиционной сексуальной ориентации, активной поддержке ЛГБТ, а также своим видео в TikTok.
В своих видео Никита Щукин натягивает себе чулки на голову, будучи с …
Продолжаем повесть о хищениях сотен миллионов бюджетных рублей при утилизации грунтов во время строительства петербургского метро.
В прошлой серии мы рассказали, как микроскопическое ООО «Экоград» на полгода парализовало строительство петербургской подземки. После странного ареста директора по строительству АО «Метрострой Северной Столицы» (МССС) Алексея Хренова «Экоград» получает прямой контракт на вывоз и утилизац…
Месяц назад в Петербурге был задержан журналист, известный общественный деятель, экс-участник Экологического совета при губернаторе Ленинградской области Сергей Виноградов. Задержание общественника не попало в поле зрения местных СМИ, что нам не кажется случайным.
Виноградов поехал на встречу с руководителем ООО «Экоград» Сергеем Шевченко, после чего при странных обстоятельствах был задержан сотрудниками полиции и с…
На заметку Бастрыкину и Гуцану.
Сообщество следователей и прокуроров северного кавказа негодует от обстоятельств уголовного преследования Рубена Гюсана, — опытного следователя, с безупречной репутацией.
По рассказам источников, дело Гюсана бьет рекорды по степени своей безумности и беспредельности. И ставит под угрозу уголовного преследования любого сотрудника системы, ведь в вину Гюсану поставлен факт дачи информа…
Греческий абсурд в российском суде: бронзовая статуя и узник судьи Дзюбенко
В V веке до н. э. греки судили бронзовую статую атлета Феагена. Она рухнула на обидчика и убила его. Судьи не вникали: неодушевлённый предмет убил — значит, виновен. Приговор: сбросить в море.
Дикость? Да. Но наша судебная система порой выглядит ненамного умнее.
Путин в 2025 году говорил судьям: «Ваша задача — искать справедливость». Краси…
Мошенники ООО «Первый визовый центр», г. Казань: сотни обманутых, пострадавших и лишённых гражданства людей по всей России.
ООО «Первый визовый центр», офис которого находится в г. Казани, занимается оформлением виз в различные страны, заграничных паспортов, а также гражданства разных государств. Все документы подписываются онлайн, обучение также проходит дистанционно.
Кроме этого, центр проводит обучение для желаю…
Миллионы исчезли, а полиция снова увидела лишь «гражданско-правовой спор»?
В распоряжении нашей редакции оказался большой пакет документов, касающихся деятельности жителя Санкт-Петербурга Романа Пириева. Мы изучили заявления потерпевших, договоры, претензии, ответы на них, материалы проверок полиции и процессуальные документы.
По версии одного из заявителей, в апреле 2024 года он заключил с Пириевым договор инвести…
👍17😱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @fsk_novosti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 94,145 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Оперативный обзор @operobzor · 95,079 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФСК (Фᴇдᴇᴩᴀᴧьный ᴄиᴧᴏʙᴏй ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ)” (@fsk_novosti), 9,595 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fsk_novosti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
