Ну с выходом opus 4.8, точно нет 🥵
😁15🌚2👀2🙊1

Channel
@frontend_tales
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,831subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001926580926 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @frontend_tales |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/frontend_tales |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 1,831 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:06 | 1,839 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 1,837 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 1,839 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 1,843 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 1,846 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 1,852 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 1,858 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 1,859 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 1,859 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
372 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 111 | 29.8% | |
| 🔥 | 106 | 28.5% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 12.1% | |
| 😱 | 23 | 6.18% | |
| custom 5949665277133198753 | 19 | 5.11% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 4.57% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 2.42% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 1.61% | |
| 👾 | 6 | 1.61% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 1.61% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 1.08% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.806% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.538% | |
| custom 5348053282243779401 | 1 | 0.269% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.269% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.269% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.269% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.269% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 372 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @frontend_tales. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 29 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ну с выходом opus 4.8, точно нет 🥵
😁15🌚2👀2🙊1
Уууу валит
😁30🔥4🦄3
♊️Gemini CLI и Subagents На примере простого проекта с нуля разберем, как настроить и связать между собой субагентов для решения сложных задач. Читать тут
👍5🔥4custom 59496652771331987533🎉1
🌐 Превращаем любой сайт в приложение с помощью Pake. Из интересного: тут не используются Electron или браузеры, а какие-то нативные библиотеки, и написано это всё на Rust. В итоге объем этого приложения может быть меньше 5 МБ, у electron минимум 100 МБ... # Install Pake CLI pnpm install -g pake-cli # Basic usage - automatically fetches website icon pake https://github.com --name GitHub # Advanced usage with cust…
🔥12👍3❤2😱2
Опять тут вышла самая умная. лучшая модель - Qwen 3.7-Max. И результаты тестов интересные 😁
🔥7🤔5👾3😁2
Когда ты null null, а хотел быть [object Object] 🥲
😁25😍4🌚3👀3
💦Жидкое стекло в вебе: canvas, WebGPU и без CSS blur Интересная либа liquid-dom - считывает HTML-структуру страницы, переносит её в Canvas и использует WebGPU/WebGL для рендеринга физически корректных преломлений, бликов и капель в реальном времени. 🌿Github https://github.com/AndrewPrifer/liquid-dom 🌿Демка https://liquid-dom-showcase.vercel.app/
🔥7👍5❤3🍓1
Не забываем 🗒️
👍7😁5❤3💅2
😱 Вчера злоумышленник опубликовал 84 вредоносные версии в 42 пакетах @tanstack/*, которые были доступны около 20 минут, пока они не были обнаружены. Хорошая новость: атаку выявили быстро, пакеты были помечены как устаревшие. Плохая новость: если вы запускали npm install вчера и у вас есть в проекте @tanstack/* - у вас возможно есть эти вредоносные пакеты... 🥲 А как так получилось ??? Атака строилась на цепочке из…
😱13👀4✍1🌚1
🤖Gemini CLI, как пользоваться, какие есть функции и пр. https://frontendtales.ru/ru/blog/gemini-cli-part-one
🔥8👍4❤3custom 53480532822437794011
Вроде там и код на русском пишут....
😁16💯5🤩3❤1
🖥 Интересная альтернатива Firebase и Supabase - PocketBase Есть даже SDK для JS. Но есть нюанс 🤔 Please keep in mind that PocketBase is still under active development and full backward compatibility is not guaranteed before reaching v1.0.0. PocketBase is NOT recommended for production critical applications yet, unless you are fine with reading the changelog and applying some manual migration steps from time to time…
🔥8custom 59496652771331987536👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @frontend_tales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@frontend_tales named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📝 Рассказ фронтендера” (@frontend_tales), 1,831 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frontend_tales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.