This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 5 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,200–4,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:53
4,202
-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:50
4,206
-7
7 Aug 2026, 15:41
4,213
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:17
4,213
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.74%
avg views ÷ 4,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
367
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
27 (27 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
9,918
Reactions total
270
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 24s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
270 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
88
32.6%
😁
83
30.7%
👍
59
21.9%
👎
17
6.30%
😢
13
4.81%
❤
10
3.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Колобок» внезапно оценили в пауках — и это выглядит странно
На Кинопоиске у «Колобка» сломалась привычная шкала: вместо звёзд теперь 1,7 паука из 10 пауков.
При этом у остальных фильмов всё по-старому — даже у самого «Человека-паука».
Похоже, рейтинг пополз не туда.
Вотум
В Твери задержали 17-летнюю за видео атаки БПЛА — и записали с ней «извинения»
Полиция заявила, что девушка распространяла ролик с атакой украинских дронов. На неё оформили протокол по ч. 1 ст. 20.6.1 КоАП (режим ЧС), а также опубликовали видео, где она обещает больше не делиться подобным.
Отдельный протокол составили на родителей — за «ненадлежащее воспитание».
Похожие случаи уже были: в июне в Волгограде задержа…
Нейросети уже заменяют носителей языка.
В Telegram быстро набирает популярность ИИ-девушка Chatty, с которой можно голосом практиковать живой разговорный английский и ещё 12 языков на основе новейших моделей искусственного интеллекта. Попробовать можно бесплатно.
🇬🇧 Английский: @ChattyEnglishBot
🇩🇪 Немецкий: @ChattyGermanBot
🇪🇸 Испанский: @ChattySpanishBot
🇫🇷 Французский: @ChattyFrenchBot
🇮🇹 Итальянский: @ChattyIta…
Партия «Родина» подала иск в Верховный суд с требованием отменить регистрацию «Яблока» на выборах в Госдуму, сообщил депутат Журавлёв.
В пресс-службе ВС подтвердили поступление заявления об отмене регистрации федерального списка кандидатов от «Яблока».
Вотум
⚡️ Российским детям могут запретить регистрацию в мессенджерах и соцсетях по номеру телефона.
Такая идея внезапно всплыла в новой версии правил связи. В ней хотят запретить отправку SMS на детские SIM-карты.
➡️ Соответственно, условия будут также включать сообщения с кодами для входа в сервисы. Исключение могут сделать, конечно, только для госсистем вроде «Госуслуг».
Операторы встретили проект с критикой и уже тре…
Деньги из дорожных фондов могут направить не только на асфальт. Минтранс готовит поправки: средства разрешат тратить на защиту от дронов и устранение последствий воздушных атак.
Вотум
‼️ Минцифры продолжило угрожать россиянам МАХом: в министерстве заявили, что национальный мессенджер останется с гражданами навсегда.
Цитата прозвучала во время обсуждения будущего развития «Госуслуг» в контексте анонса превращения сервиса в «большую социальную медиаплатформу».
➡️ Глава Минцифры заявил, что там будет всё, но мессенджера не будет — вместо него будет работать МАХ.
Мы уже и не надеялись 💀
👁️ Запусти…
По Москве прокатился мощный звук, похожий на взрыв
Из разных районов сообщают о сильном хлопке — его слышали в центре, за Садовым кольцом и даже за МКАДом. Почти весь город отметил громкий звук, происхождение пока неясно.
Вотум
Типичный день в России наглядно.
Скоро и биржи поиска работы перенесут в МАХ 😭
👁️ Запустить MagnumVPN | 📱 Подробнее о сервисе
❤1👎1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @fromsobol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“От Соболь с любовью” (@fromsobol), 4,202 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fromsobol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.