Channel
@fromTrauma_toHealing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,028subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003163907945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fromTrauma_toHealing |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fromTrauma_toHealing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 1,028 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 1,023 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 1,024 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 1,023 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,023 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,223 |
| Reactions total | 170 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
251 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 180 | 71.7% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 20.7% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 3.98% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.59% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.398% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چند تمرین کوتاه برای کم کردن مهرطلبی هدف این تمرینها این نیست که مهربون بودن رو کنار بذاریم. هدف اینه که یاد بگیریم مهربونی، از انتخاب بیاد نه از ترس. قبل از جواب دادن مکث کن. وقتی کسی ازت چیزی میخواد، سریع نگو «باشه». چند ثانیه مکث کن و از خودت بپرس: «واقعاً میخوام این کار رو انجام بدم یا میترسم ناراحتش کنم؟» با نههای کوچک شروع کن. لازم نیست یکدفعه مرزهای بزرگی بذاری. از موقعیتهای کوچیک…
❤20
🔹نشونههای مهرطلبی توی زندگی روزمره مهرطلبی همیشه شبیه «خیلی مهربون بودن» نیست. گاهی خودش رو توی خستگی، دلخوریهای نگفته و نادیده گرفتن خودمون نشون میده. چند تا نشونهش: - سخت میتونی به درخواست بقیه «نه» بگی، حتی وقتی خودت خستهای یا وقت نداری. - قبل از اینکه ببینی خودت چی میخوای، سریع به این فکر میکنی که «بقیه چی فکر میکنن؟» - اگه کسی ازت ناراحت بشه، زود احساس گناه میکنی و فکر میکنی حتماً تو اشتباه کردی. - …
❤11
🔹 مهرطلبی مهرطلبی از بیرون ممکنه یه ویژگی دوستداشتنی به نظر برسه. آدمی که همیشه مهربونه، کمک میکنه، کسی رو ناراحت نمیکنه و سعی میکنه حال همه خوب باشه. اما گاهی پشت این مهربونی، یه اجبار پنهان وجود داره. آدم مهرطلب نمیخواد صرفا بقیه رو خوشحال کنه؛ انگار مجبوره این کار رو انجام بده. چون یه جایی در گذشته یاد گرفته که برای دوست داشته شدن، باید خودش رو با خواستههای دیگران هماهنگ کنه. خیلی از آدمهایی که مهرطلب…
❤16
پس مثل قبل ادامه میدیم با سرعت بیشتر🌱
❤9👏2
چطوری ادامه بدیم؟
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🙏6❤1👎1😐1
🔷چند تمرین کوتاه برای آرامتر کردن بدبینی هدف این تمرینها این نیست که خودمون رو مجبور کنیم مثبت فکر کنیم. هدف اینه که ذهن، کمکم یاد بگیره دنیا فقط از خطر تشکیل نشده. از خودت بپرس: «دارم واقعیت رو میبینم، یا دارم از یک زخم قدیمی محافظت میکنم؟» دنبال شواهد هم باش. اگر ذهنت فقط روی نشونههای منفی زوم کرده، از خودت بپرس: «چه شواهدی هست که با این فکر همخوانی نداره؟» بین احتمال و قطعیت فرق بذار. به …
👍14❤7
🔹بدبینی چه نشونههایی داره؟ -قبل از اینکه اتفاقی بیفته، بدترین نتیجهی ممکن رو تصور میکنی. -وقتی اتفاق خوبی میفته، با خودت میگی: «حتماً یه جای کار میلنگه.» -تعریف، محبت یا توجه دیگران رو سخت باور میکنی و پشتش دنبال نیت پنهان میگردی. -به جای فرصتها، اول از همه خطرها و شکستها رو میبینی. -وقتی کسی قولی میده، بیشتر منتظر عمل نکردنش هستی. -از خوشحال شدن یا امیدوار شدن میترسی، چون فکر میکنی ناامیدی بعدش دردن…
👍7❤3👏1
🔹بدبینی بدبینی فقط این نیست که نیمهی خالی لیوان رو ببینیم. خیلی وقتها بدبینی، یک سپر روانیه؛ راهی که ذهن برای محافظت از خودش یاد گرفته. آدم بدبین لزوماً دنیا رو واقعبینانهتر نمیبینه. خیلی از قضاوتها و پیشبینیهای منفی، بیشتر از اینکه حاصل یک تحلیل بیطرفانه باشن، از یک زخم قدیمی میان. پشت جملههایی مثل: «آخرش خراب میشه.» «به کسی نمیشه اعتماد کرد.» «حتماً یه جای کار میلنگه.» اغلب یک ترس عمیق پنهانه؛ ترس ا…
❤12👍3
سلام🌱 در صورت قطع اینترنت بین الملل، لینک کانال اطلاع تیم قرار توی اپ «بله» رو داشته باشین تا از اخبار جدید تیم مثل وبینار ها و دورهها با خبر بشین. http://ble.ir/ghararsupport همچنین شما میتونید با تیم پذیرش هم از طریق شناسه آیدی ghararteam روی تلگرام و بله در ارتباط باشین✨
❤4
🔹چند تمرین کوتاه برای رهایی از الگوی روابط یکطرفه اگر بارها خودت رو در رابطههای یکطرفه پیدا میکنی، قبل از اینکه بخوای رابطه رو عوض کنی، بد نیست کمی با الگوی درونت آشنا بشی. از خودت بپرس: این آدم، چه حسی رو برام آشنا میکنه؟ آرامش؟ یا اضطراب، انتظار و جنگیدن برای دیده شدن؟ علاقه را با اضطراب اشتباه نگیر. گاهی چیزی که اسمش را «عشق» میگذاریم، در واقع ترس از دست دادن یا نیاز به تأیید شدنه. به رفتار ن…
❤19
🔹نشانههای روابط یکطرفه این الگو همیشه با «انتخاب آدم اشتباه» شروع نمیشه. گاهی از یک احساس آشنا شروع میشه؛ احساسی که از کودکی باهامون مونده. بعضی از نشونههاش ایناست: -بیشتر جذب آدمهایی میشی که از نظر عاطفی در دسترس نیستن. -مدام احساس میکنی باید محبت طرف مقابل رو به دست بیاری. -اگر کسی با ثبات، مهربون و قابل اعتماد باشه، هیجان زیادی نسبت بهش احساس نمیکنی. -نگران از دست دادن رابطهای هستی که در اون نیازهای عاطف…
❤14
🔹روابط یکطرفه یکی از پیچیدهترین اثرهای تروما اینه که گاهی نمیتونیم خودمون رو در رابطهای تصور کنیم که توش، بدون جنگیدن، دوست داشته بشیم. برای بعضی از ما، حضور یک آدم مهربون، باثبات و ملاحظهگر، به جای اینکه آرامشبخش باشه، غریب و حتی آشفتهکنندهست. انگار یک جای ذهنمون میگه: «این واقعی نیست.» در عوض، جذب رابطههایی میشیم که باید توشون مدام منتظر بمونیم، خودمون رو ثابت کنیم، نادیده گرفته بشیم یا برای ذرهای مح…
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fromTrauma_toHealing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
چطوری ادامه بدیم؟
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 60,171 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“از تروما تا التیام” (@fromTrauma_toHealing), 1,028 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fromTrauma_toHealing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.