Channel
@fritz_com_de
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,474subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001119682655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fritz_com_de |
| Created | Between 1 April 2017 and 31 October 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fritz_com_de |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 4,474 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 4,478 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 4,481 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 4,483 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 4,486 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 4,491 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 4,491 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (9 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,880 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Zum Ende der Woche wird die FRITZ!Box 5590 Fiber ins FRITZ! Labor aufgenommen und erhält damit die neue DNS-Filter-Funktion sowie die Routinen mit mehreren Auslösern. 🚀 🧪Die neuste Version jetzt testen: fritz.com/labor
Um FRITZ!Repeater in Reihe zu schalten, müssen ein paar Punkte beachtet werden.‼️ Welche genau verrät Dom in diesem Frag FRITZ!. 👉 youtu.be/SNIXqN0Wsgw
Auch für die FRITZ!Repeater 2700 & 1700 gibt es ein neues Labor zum Testen. 🧪Gleich ausprobieren und Feedback hinterlassen: fritz.com/labor
Ein neues FRITZ! Labor Update auf FRITZ!OS 8.40 steht für mehrere FRITZ!Box-Modelle bereit: 🔧 FRITZ!Box 5690 Pro & 7530 AX 🔧 FRITZ!Box 6690, 6670 & 6660 Cable 🧪 Jetzt die neueste Version installieren und Feedback geben: fritz.com/labor
Für die FRITZ!Box 7690, 7590 AX, 7590 & 5690 geht es heute wieder in eine neue Updaterunde im FRITZ! Labor. 🧪Jetzt installieren & testen: fritz.com/labor
Zum Wochenstart gab es kein Update? Das holen wir nach! FRITZ!OS 8.25 steht nun für die FRITZ!Box 6860 5G v2 zur Verfügung. 🥳 Jetzt updaten und die neuesten Features genießen!
Neues Labor-Update mit Matter für deine FRITZ!Box 5690 Pro im FRITZ! Labor. 🚀 🧪 Die neuste Version installieren und testen: fritz.com/labor
Heute wieder eine große Updaterunde im FRITZ! Labor: 🔧 FRITZ!OS 8.40 für FRITZ!Box 5690, 7690, 7590 AX, 7590 und 7530 AX 🔧 FRITZ!OS 8.24 für FRITZ!Repeater 2700 und 1700 🧪 Installieren und Feedback geben: fritz.com/labor
Du fragst dich, wofür du im Jahr 2026 noch einen WLAN-Stick brauchst? In diesem Frag FRITZ! Video erklärt dir Dom den wichtigsten Anwendungszweck. 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wM6lOtOqCA
Für die folgenden FRITZ!Box-Modelle steht eine neue Version im FRITZ! Labor bereit: 🔧 FRITZ! Labor 8.40 für FRITZ!Box 6690 & 6670 Cable 🧪 Teste die neuesten Verbesserungen: fritz.com/labor
Die FRITZ!Box 5690 Pro ist neu im FRITZ! Labor – mit einem echten Highlight: Matter ist erstmals direkt auf deiner FRITZ!Box verfügbar. 🚀 🧪 Jetzt installieren und testen: fritz.com/labor
Profitiere jetzt auch mit deiner FRITZ!Box 7682 von den Verbesserungen in FRITZ!OS 8.25. 🥳 Update in der Benutzeroberfläche suchen und sofort installieren.
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @fritz_com_de. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 956,497 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FRITZ! News” (@fritz_com_de), 4,474 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fritz_com_de.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.