Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for frightG Team Android Ports

Channel

frightG Team Android Ports

@frightGPorts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

799subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003741685457
TypeChannel
Username@frightGPorts
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/frightGPorts

Growth

7757997877 August 2026 — 775 subscribers8 August 2026 — 775 subscribers8 August 2026 — 777 subscribers15 August 2026 — 799 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 771–803 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:52799+22
8 Aug 2026, 06:47777+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:48775no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:01775first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
138.3%
avg views ÷ 799 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.672%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held9 (19 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total7,733
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓2536.8%
👏1217.6%
❤‍🔥1116.2%
1014.7%
👀68.82%
🔥45.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC791 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Who has already completed the game?

🍓4

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

24 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC781 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Well, have you had a chance to play? Post your records.

🍓4

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

23 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC792 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I also unlocked the "Normal Mode" - which is a paid option in the original.

❤‍🔥10

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

23 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC784 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I promised I'd finish it, and I did. It plays great.

👏6

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

23 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC≈2,810 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

TrapAdventure 2 Game Version: 1.18 (Updated January 28, 2026) Port Version: 1.0 (Android) Package: net.hirojaca.trap2 Version Code: 10 Minimum Android: 6.0 (API 23) --- This game is the sequel to TrapAdventure. It's unfair. It's frustrating. And it absolutely does not care about your feelings. You will fail. Repeatedly. You will question your skills. Possibly your life choices. But if you're the kind of player who

9🔥4❤‍🔥1

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

20 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC877 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

A couple more shreds and I'll post it

👏6🍓31

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

20 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC898 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

In short, the ending has been fixed, and the vibration too.

🍓4

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

19 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC986 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓9

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

19 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,020 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👀6🍓1

Signed DENiZTR8008 (frightG)

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @frightGPorts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 354,615 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“frightG Team Android Ports” (@frightGPorts), 799 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frightGPorts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.