Photo, posted without a caption
🏆105❤47🤔19❤🔥6🔥4🍌2💯2👀1

Channel
@freshspark
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,053subscribers
-742 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001621970032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freshspark |
| Description | Тоталитарное сообщество. Все ссылки - https://tapy.me/fresh ✉️ Написать мне @freshspark_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freshspark |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 02:56 | 22,053 | +1 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:50 | 22,052 | +7 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:57 | 22,045 | -26 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 22,071 | +2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:39 | 22,069 | -12 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:49 | 22,081 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:50 | 22,091 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:07 | 22,097 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:29 | 22,105 | -22 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 22,127 | -44 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:20 | 22,171 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 22,176 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 22,184 | -14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 22,198 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 22,208 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:28 | 22,223 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 22,225 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:01 | 22,235 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 22,247 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 22,249 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (4 June 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 55,260 |
| Reactions total | 1,318 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 15:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
12,125 reactions across 35 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,544 | 45.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1,312 | 10.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,192 | 9.83% | |
| 😁 | 622 | 5.13% | |
| 👍 | 503 | 4.15% | |
| 🌚 | 365 | 3.01% | |
| 🥰 | 340 | 2.80% | |
| 🍌 | 333 | 2.75% | |
| 👎 | 280 | 2.31% | |
| 💔 | 233 | 1.92% | |
| 🤔 | 191 | 1.58% | |
| 🤯 | 183 | 1.51% | |
| 💯 | 180 | 1.48% | |
| 🏆 | 125 | 1.03% | |
| 💊 | 124 | 1.02% | |
| 🕊 | 122 | 1.01% | |
| 🤨 | 116 | 0.957% | |
| 🤝 | 106 | 0.874% | |
| 👾 | 68 | 0.561% | |
| 🍾 | 57 | 0.47% | |
| 10 further kinds | 129 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @freshspark. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
🏆105❤47🤔19❤🔥6🔥4🍌2💯2👀1
Я завел аккаунт на PornHub https://youtu.be/C7D-OAIKWas
🔥115🍌34🌚25❤13🤔8👎2💅2
Крутилась у меня мысль, что творчество больше никогда не будет чем-то по-настоящему важным. Раньше подукт творчества встречался человеку не чаще чем кусочек банана в граноле. Вот снял ты черно-белый фильм, посмотрит его человек в кинотеатре, запомнит, будет думать о нем, вспоминать при случае, расказывать знакомым, кстати, есть такой вот фильм... Недавно вот выходила Одиссея, трехчасовая эпопея, только об этом и го…
❤226💯26🤔16❤🔥5🍌3👍3😁2🔥1
До недавнего времени во мне все еще были живы остатки скептицизма к ИИ будущему. Ну знаете, все эти иишные тексты, которые палятся с первой фразы, нейрослоп, да и вообще "это не интеллект". Думал, ну да, изменения будут, но насколько повсеместно и действительно радикально - еще посмотрим. Но в последние месяцы стало окончательно ясно, что беспрецедентный тотальный переворот всего и вся просто неизбежен. И возможно …
❤184❤🔥20🥰10💯9🙈5🤔4👾3🔥3
Кстати, вакансия креативного соавтора все еще актуальна. Так что если вы крутой и шарите за сценарии, заполняйте форму, я всех отсматриваю - форма. Многие авторы стесняются признаваться в том, что им кто-то помогает, а мне кажется, что желанию создавать что-то понастоящему крутое неплохо бы быть сильнее личного тщеславия. Еще мой дед говорил - в одиночку ничего не построишь. Заполняйте, или отправляйте знакомым. По…
❤84👍13💊3❤🔥2🍌2🤝2👾1
Часть людей к моему удивлению почему-то решили что история с Мишей выдумана. Если уж я бы и стал ларпить, то явно бы придумал что-то поэпичнее истории, где герои 80% времени сидят на лавке и разговаривают. Рил не понимаю что там могло показаться не реалистичным
😁132❤24🤔5🔥3
Веди себя как Дебил с девушками, друзьями и работой. ДЕБИЛМАКСИНГ 👉️️️️️️ Смотреть
❤117❤🔥18
Афигеть, с вашей помощью меньше чем за сутки удалось собрать всю сумму. Честно, не ожидал что прям настолько быстро и активно включитесь, даже неловко теперь что недооценил. Спасибо 🖤
❤304🕊71❤🔥36🔥10🏆2
Привет. Вот так живешь живешь, а потом вдруг раз - и у тебя рак. Мне приходилось видеть как беспричинно и оглушающе неожиданно это случается, когда рак нашли у моего младшего брата. Мне написала подруга, у нее случился рецидив рака щитовидной железы, нужна срочная операция, попросила распространить. Знаю, что некоторые скипают подобные обьявления, но может быть именно сегодня вам захочется почувствовать что вы сдела…
💔225❤68🕊37🤔8👎2🔥2👍1🤝1
Забавляет, когда чуваки в разговоре обсуждают локальное музло, артахус кино, модные шмотки, думая что их делает особенными сам факт осведомленности о том, что кто-то там сделал что-то там и они за это подшарили еее Настоящие мужики обсуждают капитализм, постмодернизм, нейробудущее + мемы с ликеем
❤303🤝35❤🔥19👎8💯7🔥5🤩5🤔4
Мне тут спамят, что какой-то чипс украл мое видео. В комментах его уже клеймят вором, я тоже молчать не стану и скажу прямо, послушай сюда, сынок, если ты это сейчас читаешь - ты молодец. Единственное, что можно не одобрять в заимствовании контента - это боязнь признать, что ты это где-то подстмотрел. Пиплы каждый день потребляют с тысячу единиц контента, что создает ощущение что производить его - раз плюнуть. Кром…
🥰294❤107❤🔥40🔥13👍7😁7🍌2👾1
Учебу я не слишком любил, и уже в младших классах выкупил что меня пытаются заставить работать за фейковую валюту - оценки. Но само по себе 1 сентября, мне на самом деле всегда латентно нравилось. Еще стоит теплая погода, встречаешь своих друганов, ненависть к недругам за лето успела подвыветриться. Грудь у девочек снова стала больше. Начинается новый жизненный этап емае, в этом учебном году все будет по-другому, во…
❤138❤🔥24🔥9🥰4🌚2👎2👾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @freshspark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@freshspark edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @freshspark as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свежий” (@freshspark), 22,053 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freshspark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.