Channel
@freerussia_report
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,883subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001667473035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freerussia_report |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freerussia_report |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 2,883 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 2,886 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 2,887 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 2,887 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
812 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 156 | 19.2% | |
| 💯 | 131 | 16.1% | |
| 😁 | 102 | 12.6% | |
| 🤬 | 78 | 9.61% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 6.03% | |
| 😭 | 40 | 4.93% | |
| 👏 | 39 | 4.80% | |
| 🤣 | 38 | 4.68% | |
| 🫡 | 35 | 4.31% | |
| 🤡 | 33 | 4.06% | |
| 🤮 | 25 | 3.08% | |
| 🥰 | 24 | 2.96% | |
| 🤷♀ | 23 | 2.83% | |
| 💩 | 21 | 2.59% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 0.862% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.493% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.246% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.246% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.246% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.123% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 812reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 7 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This channel has been kept free of donation requests - for a reason Nonetheless I'll break with this standard now in publishing Timothy Snyders text about how to help Ukraine in now the fifth and worst winter - also for a reason. The Long Ukrainian Winter by Timothy Snyder Dear Friends, Russia’s full-scale of invasion began four years ago. It began in winter, and so this winter is the fifth. And, for civilians, t…
❤21👏13🙏6👍4
The Bill of Wrongs A Cult Constitution by Timothy Snyder 1. Congress shall make no law denying the Cult of all-wise Trump, or limiting the exercise thereof; or abridging His sole Freedom to define Truth, which includes his Self-Given Power to defraud, slander, and censor; the right of the people to assemble in worship of all-wise Trump, and to sacrifice Enemies for His Truth, shall in no wise be hindered; petitions…
💯27😁3❤2
A reminder: Members are encouraged to share the news they found most interesting - and important in the chat: https://t.me/+jFRMFUpcxQwwNmFh ... not referring to flashy click-bait news copied by a thousand channels
👍40❤3🤡2
Some reporting by the chat members will continue for the moment in the chat: https://t.me/+jFRMFUpcxQwwNmFh
🥰24👏11🤡3❤2
I've been asked for recommendations of English channels, but I'm really not the right person to address as I scoured the Ukrainian, russian and ruZZian sources. Here's a channel I can recommend: https://t.me/MorgothsDarkness Mostly war videos, but also news and they fact-check.
👍34❤3👏3💩3
Okay, a last one, because it's so funny.: Former Trump US National Security Adviser announced Trump's capitulation to Putin Trump has shown weakness in resolving the war in Ukraine because he has followed Russia's lead, his former national security adviser John Bolton said. He drew attention to the concessions to the Kremlin, which the new White House administration actually announced its readiness for. According to…
💯61👍17❤8💩1🤔1
Dear subscribers I am shutting down the Report Group project, as it doesn't work out. The Ukraine Report is already closed and will be deleted. As well as Israel Report and Free Russia Report. Thank you for your time and wish you the best
😭40🫡35🤝4💩3🤡2❤1
Just shooting out the last posts.
💩6🤡3
domestic gas prices increasing
😁18👍14💩2❤1
prices lower than tomorrow
😁37👍10❤2💩1
medals
💯43🤣2❤1💩1
Russia’s military spending soars, surpassing all of Europe’s defense budgets combined — The Financial Times — Meduza https://meduza.io/en/news/2025/02/13/russia-s-military-spending-soars-surpassing-all-of-europe-s-defense-budgets-combined-the-financial-times
🤬17🤮9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @freerussia_report. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 665,232 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Free Russia Report” (@freerussia_report), 2,883 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freerussia_report.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.