Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Free Palestine TV تلفزيون تحرير فلسطين

@freepalestinetv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,932subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002007349636
TypeChannel
Username@freepalestinetv
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/freepalestinetv

Growth

3,9323,9413,936.57 August 2026 — 3,941 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,941 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,940 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,937 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,931–3,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:253,932-5
10 Aug 2026, 19:123,937-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:313,940-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:023,941no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:523,941first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.68%
avg views ÷ 3,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
302
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,435
Reactions total375
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 26m
Average length
8m 07s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

375 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11029.3%
🙏5915.7%
🤬5514.7%
💯308.00%
🔥308.00%
👍297.73%
😢174.53%
😱102.67%
😨71.87%
💔61.60%
🤯61.60%
🤔51.33%
🤮41.07%
❤‍🔥30.8%
20.533%
👏10.267%
😭10.267%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 375reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC139 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Zionist's Beirut Port Attack Set Off By Ammonium Nitrate Destined for Wahhabi Death Squads in Syria Ali Mazloum Reports from Beirut Port Attack Commemoration. Filmed On: 4/8/2026 Donate/Watch/Share/Shop: FreePalestine.Video

😢7🤬32

7 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC154 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Seeking Justice for Martyr Amal Khalil Ali Mazloum reports from a legal conference in Beirut revealing evidence pertaining to the Zionist Entity's premeditated murder of Al-Akhbar Newspaper's veteran journalist, the Eyes of South Lebanon, Amal Khalil, on April 22nd of this year. Martyr Amal Khalil is one of hundreds of press workers murdered by the jewish entity across Lebanon, Palestine, Yemen, Syria, and Iran - th

👍7🙏65

6 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC260 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Jewish Colonists on Spanish Trains: CAF's Crimes in Palestine Laith Marouf joins Malen and Ron with JARDUN to investigate Zionist complicity at CAF train factory in the Spanish Kingdom-occupied Basque Country. One of the largest rail producers in the world, CAF or Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles produces trains for raillines in Al-Quds and Yafa, facilitating the expansion of jewish colonization in Occupie

🔥10😱4👍32🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC302 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Decolonizing Lebanon's Soil: Agrimovement Defies Zionist Ecocide Ali Mazloum visits Agricultural Movement in Lebanon's (AgriMovement) farm in Jadra to report on it's grassroots organizing and sustainable, sovereign, and decolonized agricultural practices - resisting zionist ecocide and the imperialist, pesticide-fueled "green revolution." Ali speaks with co-founder Bashar Abu Seifan and president Sarah Salloum on t

17🙏6👍4

4 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC285 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Residents of Zawtar Speak After Return to Homes Destroyed by Zionist Invaders Ali Mazloum Reports. ("Zionist Monsters, Sons of Epstein:" Zawtar's Residents Speak After Return) Filmed On: 30/7/26 Watch Full Report: https://youtu.be/wPu-z1liRaQ Donate/Watch/Share/Shop: FreePalestine.Video

13🙏9🤬32😢1😱1

4 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC301 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Vichy Regime Abandons Lebanon; Nabatieh Resists Ali Mazloum reports from Nabatieh city in southern Lebanon for a rally against the Vichy regime's normalization deal with the jewish colony. Interviewing locals at the protest, Ali discusses the government's abandonment of it's displaced civilians to the zionist entity's ongoing genocidal invasion and it's attempts to undermine the valiant warriors of the resistance fo

🙏1311🔥5

4 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC268 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Companies That Support Child-Murdering Zionist Colony Must Be Boycotted Ali Mazloum Reports. ("Zionist Monsters, Sons of Epstein:" Zawtar's Residents Speak After Return) Filmed On: 30/7/26 Watch Full Report: https://youtu.be/wPu-z1liRaQ Donate/Watch/Share/Shop: FreePalestine.Video

💯205👍2🙏2

3 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC420 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Drunken Zionist Soldiers, Sons of Epstein, Desecrate Houses of Western Zawtar Village Ali Mazloum Reports. ("Zionist Monsters, Sons of Epstein:" Zawtar's Residents Speak After Return) Filmed On: 30/7/26 Watch Full Report: https://youtu.be/wPu-z1liRaQ Donate/Watch/Share/Shop: FreePalestine.Video

🤬21😨5🤮4

3 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC332 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Zionist Invaders Leave Trail of Destruction in Lebanon's Zawtar Al-Gharbiya Village Ali Mazloum Reports. ("Zionist Monsters, Sons of Epstein:" Zawtar's Residents Speak After Return) Filmed On: 30/7/26 Watch Full Report: https://youtu.be/wPu-z1liRaQ Donate/Watch/Share/Shop: FreePalestine.Video

🙏74👍4💔3🤬3😨2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @freepalestinetv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 530,132 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Free Palestine TV تلفزيون تحرير فلسطين” (@freepalestinetv), 3,932 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freepalestinetv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.