Channel
@freedurov_bot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
72subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002084805376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freedurov_bot |
| Created | 24 August 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freedurov_bot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 72 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 72 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 24 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
256 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🫡 | 160 | 62.5% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 10.9% | |
| 🕊 | 24 | 9.38% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 6.64% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.34% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2024 to 23 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я тут нейронкой занялся, вы конечно можете пойти нахуй и отписаться, но я сюда буду лить свои работы. Хули прятать свои работы в закромах своего китайского ушлепка с 16 Гб ОЗУ, когда есть пустой ТГ канал и пару дегенов в этом канале, анонимно следящих за моим бредом. Хороших каникул пупсики, много не работайте , а то вдруг не оценят 😘
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
❤️ Thanks everyone for your support and love! Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram. This was surprising for several reasons: 1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its…
❤3
Павел Дуров освобождён из-под стражи, он покинул здание суда в Париже на частном автомобиле, передаёт корреспондент РИА Новости
🔥6
Press Release Pavel DUROV, founder and CEO of instant messaging and platform TELEGRAM, was arrested at Le Bourget airport in the outskirts of Paris on Saturday, the 24th of August 2024, then taken into police custody at 8 p.m. This measure comes in the context of a judicial investigation opened the 8th of July 2024, following a preliminary inquiry initiated by Section J3 - JUNALCO (Fight against Cybercrime) of the …
🫡2
https://www.tribunal-de-paris.justice.fr/sites/default/files/2024-08/2024-08-26%20-%20CP%20TELEGRAM%20.pdf
https://t.me/tgresistancebot/letter Присоединяйтесь к #DigitalResistance. Подпишите Открытое письмо за #FREEDUROV.
👍5
#FREEDUROV #FREEPAVEL
👍6
The deep state appears to have launched a full-scale attack on the financial system. Attempts to hack secure information such as credit card data and Social Security numbers continue as operatives attempt to revive old systems of financial slavery. So far, these attempts have failed. Attempts to use Treasury and Federal Reserve debt to generate new assets have failed. The arrest of Pavel Durov is the latest in a chai…
🫡26👍16🤔5💔2🤡2❤1
Pavel Durov left Russia when the government tried to control his social media company, Telegram. But in the end, it wasn’t Putin who arrested him for allowing the public to exercise free speech. It was a western country, a Biden administration ally and enthusiastic NATO member, that locked him away. Pavel Durov sits in a French jail tonight, a living warning to any platform owner who refuses to censor the truth at th…
🫡18🕊10🤮2❤1👍1💔1🤡1
Photo, posted without a caption
🫡114🕊14❤8😢4💩3🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @freedurov_bot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 931,305 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#FREEDUROV” (@freedurov_bot), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freedurov_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.