Channel
@freedom_life_telega
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
873subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001679882881 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freedom_life_telega |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freedom_life_telega |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 873 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 877 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 879 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 879 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 9 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
397 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 286 | 72.0% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 12.6% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 3.27% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 2.77% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 2.02% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 1.76% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 1.51% | |
| 🤷♂ | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 0.756% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 0.504% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.504% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.504% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.252% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.252% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2023 to 18 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Наверно стоит сказать заранее что я не ищу поддержки, не пытаюсь оправдать себя или кого то, я просто рассказываю историю, чтобы на будущее ошибки или недочеты могли быть учтены, и в случае повтора подобного мероприятия не повторялись) Итак что изначально пошло не по плану: первоначально мы решили отложить старт на 2 дня , чтобы Алексей успел добраться на старт и тут я совершил первую (или даже не первую) ошибку. Пов…
👍34🤮4😁2💩1
Но ... так это делалось впервые, опыта в организации подобных мероприятий не было, наши ожидания и действительность разошлись)))
😁9👌7🤷♂5👍4🌭1
Правила: 1. Вес до 200кг. Мотор до 4кВт. 2. Минимальный набор средств безопасности. Рация. 3. Можно использовать только солнечные батареи и АКБ. Паруса, ДВС, весла и педали нельзя. 4. Максимальная площадь солнечных панелей равна 4м² для байдарок. 8м² для лодок, катамаранов и тримаранов. Нельзя, чтоб солнечные панели выступали более чем на 50см от основного корпуса. 5. Передвигаться можно в светлое время и хорошую пог…
👍25🥴2❤1
Изначальные правила которые были придуманыи озвучены потенциальным участникам ДО начала гонок.
Еще хотел бы оставить тут изначальные правила которые мы придумали, возможно их надо было опубликовать раньше, но лучше поздно чем никогда
Результаты и призовой фонд! Гонка на скорость была 4 дня и 200км. Результаты: 1. Юрий 2. Антон +2:54 3. Анатолий + 4:03 Из-за не достатка времени и плохих погодных условий, до финиша Алексей не дошел 22км, я не дошел 15км так как первоочередно решил вернуться к Алексею около 8 км и так же счел небезопасным идти в полной темноте по незнакомой воде тем более что Юрий сказал что там водоросли и отмели да и заряда было…
🔥30👍7🤣7🤮2💩1🤔1
Оценить результаты и обобщить опыт, приобретённый в этом "путешествии" - непростая задача и не может быть выполнена "одномоментно". Одно могу сказать сразу: я очень доволен эмоциональным зарядом, который получил, но даже этот заряд описать не просто. Например - слушаю привычные аудиотреки "от Алисы" и, мне кажется, нахожу "нюансы", которые не замечал, не слышал. Уже это удивляет! Настенный календарь на самом видном м…
👍26🔥18👏3
Video, posted without a caption
👍28
Вчера закончили с выгрузкой и погрузкой катамаранов примерно в 3 ночи... все очень устали
👍32👏7
Все вместе позавтракали, собрались, выигаемся по домам.
👍66👌1
Video, posted without a caption
👍20🙈3😁2
Live stream finished (11 minutes)
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @freedom_life_telega. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Freedom_Life” (@freedom_life_telega), 873 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freedom_life_telega.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.