Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ростислав Freedom x НОО

@freedom_bio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

5,372subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001589773570
TypeChannel
Username@freedom_bio
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/freedom_bio

Growth

5,3725,4505,4117 August 2026 — 5,450 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,450 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,447 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,404 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,372 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,360–5,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:575,372-32
11 Aug 2026, 04:125,404-43
7 Aug 2026, 19:215,447-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:175,450no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:055,450first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 5,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
588
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held17 (2 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total9,414
Reactions total175
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10962.3%
❤‍🔥3017.1%
158.57%
158.57%
💋31.71%
💯21.14%
👎10.571%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC328 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Касательно того, что это «та же самая теория, только платно». Я бы сказал так: это та же самая наука. Это та же самая биология — она не может быть другой. Но курс в НОО в плане теории значительно более детальный, созданный не одной головой (моей), как мой бесплатный курс, а целой командой биологических мастодонтов. Конечно же, он полноценнее и качественнее. Теория в НОО имеет совершенно другой формат — она в видео

111❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC326 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Про Freedom Bio и то, насколько там полноценная теория — Я не считаю, что проект Freedom Bio закрыт. Он просто состоялся. Закрытым я мог бы его считать, если бы перестал оплачивать бота с конспектами, закрыл все видео и сам бы ушёл из преподавания. Пока этого не произошло — он существует, он помогает людям. Ничего подобного до сих пор не найти на просторах интернета (хоть уроки на YouTube и в VK двухлетней давност

10❤‍🔥21

11 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC320 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🔀🔀🔀🔀🔀🔀 🤩 Получено сообщение! ⁨Здравствуйте,Ростислав,подскажите пожалуйста,есть ли ещё места на вашем головном курсе? С 9 класса смотрела ваши бесплатные вебы и хотела заниматься с вами подготовкой к ЕГЭ🙏🏻⁩ — Конечно!! • Записаться на курс 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 Получено сообщение! ⁨Здравствуйте, Ростислав! Если во время курса возникнут непонятные моменты в теории, смогу ли я написать

521

10 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC447 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗝🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ — Сегодня в 20:00 стоимость годовых курсов повышается. Если планировали присоединиться — сейчас последний шанс зафиксировать старую цену 👇 🙂🙂🙂 4 890₽ → 5 090₽/мес 🙂 предмета: 8 780₽ → 9 180₽/мес 🙂 предмета: 13 170₽ → 13 770₽/мес 🙂И главное: за эту стоимость вы получаете ВСЁ необх

❤‍🔥211

9 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC549 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 ☺️овинка 🤩🤩 в НОО —Для начала хочу показать вам несколько результатов моих учеников 👆 🤩 Это лишь часть вузов, куда ребята поступили после подготовки с НОО. И каждый год я вижу, сколько вопросов у выпускников возникает уже не с экзаменами, а непосредственно с поступлением. 🤩Поэтому в этом году мы решили добавить на годовые курсы кое-что новое 👇 ☺

51❤‍🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC530 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗝🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩 Получено сообщение! ⁨Здравствуйте, у меня к вам такой вопрос : какие типы заданий из второй части мы будем разбирать на курсе глубже всего, а какие — только на базовом уровне?Заранее спасибо да ответ 💗💗⁩ — Задания не возможно разбирать "глубже" или "на базовом уровне". Ну по крайней мере я себе слабо такое предста

10💯21

8 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC570 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🗝 🗝🤩🤩🤩 🗝 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 — В этом посте собраны ссылки на все основные материалы и доступные курсы, которые ты можешь использовать в своей подготовке 🤩 🤩 🌟☺️сновные ссылки🌟🔀🔀 🤩 🤩 Анонимка • Здесь можно задать мне свой вопрос анонимно. 🤩 Записаться на курс • Курс со мной это полноценное про

7❤‍🔥64💋3

7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC620 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🤩 🌟Е Н Т Р И Ф У Г И Р О В А Н И Е 🗝 🤩 ☺️етоды цитологии часть 3 🗝 🤩 🦢Клетка — это сложная система, состоящая из множества структур. Но что делать, если учёным нужно изучить не клетку целиком, а отдельно её органоиды? Для этого используют центрифугирование. 🗝🗝🗝 🗝 ⭐️ Центрифугирование — метод, основанный на разной скор

65❤‍🔥5

7 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC621 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ☺️щё не выбрал Преподавателя на годовой? 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 А время-то идёт... — До 15 августа ещё можно выбрать своего преподавателя, а 15 августа уже стартует годовой курс :) 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 Что делать прямо сейчас: 🌟 заходишь в канал летника 🌟 находишь пост с инструкцией 🌟 смотришь преподавателей

52❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC677 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗝 Важно к прочитать! 🔀🔀🔀🔀🔀🔀

8

6 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC716 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟🔀 🔀🔀300 БАЛЛОВ НА ЕГЭ? 🔀🔀 — Готовим с любого уровня до результата, который нужен для поступления — и по цене, которую реально выгодно зафиксировать сейчас 🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿 🦢4 890 ₽/мес. <— /6 390 ₽/мес./ 🌿🌿А если берёшь несколько предметов — цена за каждый становится ещё ниже: ✴️ 2 предмета: 8 780 ₽ <— /12 780 ₽/мес./ ✴️ 3 предмета: 13 170 ₽ <— /19 170 ₽/мес./ ⚠️ 10 августа в 20:00 МСК цена повысится. 🤍Если

72❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @freedom_bio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@freedom_bio edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 703,376 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ростислав Freedom x НОО” (@freedom_bio), 5,372 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freedom_bio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.