Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Логово Joe 🎁🔪

Channel

Логово Joe 🎁🔪

@freeGiftsJoe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,406subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002467963153
TypeChannel
Username@freeGiftsJoe
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/freeGiftsJoe

Growth

1,4061,4151,410.57 August 2026 — 1,415 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,413 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,412 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,405–1,416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:551,406-6
11 Aug 2026, 14:021,412-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:421,413-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:161,415no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:131,415first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

377 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 522915957664909308113936.9%
custom 497250464041638362713535.8%
custom 54407628829271271714411.7%
custom 5255975823436973213195.04%
custom 5359622339296256165164.24%
custom 5460658605961255083164.24%
custom 533956415053420042461.59%
20.531%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 377reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 26 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @freeGiftsJoe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 September 2025 to 26 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Dec 2025, 12:38 UTC367 viewsread 7 August 2026

Участвуем друзья У всех большие шансы

26 Dec 2025, 12:38 UTC343 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @safe_garantsVIPPhoto

🎁Конкурс на NFT ICE CREAM в честь 1000 участников в чате УСЛОВИЯ: Подписаться на @SafeGarantsOTC Подписаться на @safe_garantsVIP Итоги на 300 кнопок

2

7 Oct 2025, 07:14 UTC892 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

ЗВЕЗДОПАД😁🌟 Первый кто выбьет 7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ в автомате получит 150 звезд на баланс 🤩 1 Попытка - 4 звезд🌟 Выбивать строго в комментариях под постом 😤 Логово джо 😉

custom 52291595766490930818custom 49725046404163836276custom 54606586059612550836

6 Oct 2025, 09:16 UTC742 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Буст +10% к удаче 😍

custom 54606586059612550836custom 49725046404163836272custom 52291595766490930812

6 Oct 2025, 09:15 UTC657 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Выдал 🛑 ЗВЕЗДОПАД😁🌟 Первый кто выбьет 7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ в автомате получит 150 звезд на баланс 🤩 1 Попытка - 5 звезд🌟 Выбивать строго в комментариях под постом 😤 Логово джо 😉

custom 49725046404163836273custom 52291595766490930813custom 54606586059612550832

6 Oct 2025, 09:01 UTC539 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Первым трем кто выбьет 777 🎉в комментариях под постом - по мишке 🧸 0/3 забрали 🤩 Реакция = + к удаче Логово джо 😉

custom 52291595766490930816custom 49725046404163836273custom 54606586059612550832

28 Sept 2025, 09:37 UTC707 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что то давно ничего не публиковал Хотите лудку ? 🙂

custom 52291595766490930815custom 49725046404163836273custom 53596223392962561651

25 Sept 2025, 06:48 UTC821 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый маркет: @MAGIC 🪄 Первый маркет подарков за рубли Покупай ТГ подарки через СБП с минимальной комиссией 🎁 👉 @MAGIC

custom 49725046404163836276custom 52291595766490930815custom 53395641505342004243

9 Sept 2025, 06:21 UTC≈1,020 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, началось.. Летит одна коллекция, люди видят, что есть ещё одна, где сапплай меньше и цена ещё не полетела — летит другая коллекция, и так абсолютно со всеми подарками. Продлилось это кстати в прошлый раз — 3 дня, интересно, на сколько сейчас хватит.

custom 52291595766490930818custom 49725046404163836277custom 52559758234369732136

7 Sept 2025, 11:31 UTC929 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обезьянки взлетели в цене 😱 Вчера флор начинался от 3 TON. Сейчас же обезьянки торгуются от 6 TON на Portals ❤️

custom 52291595766490930817custom 49725046404163836275custom 52559758234369732134

6 Sept 2025, 12:34 UTC796 views120 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давай разыграем 100 мишек ? 🧸 100 реакций и запускаю

custom 497250464041638362765custom 544076288292712717125custom 522915957664909308122custom 53596223392962561656custom 52559758234369732132

6 Sept 2025, 12:28 UTC780 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧦 КАКОЙ ЖЕ ВЕЗУНЧИК!!!! Только что был выбит золотой монохром носки ,это реальная удача! Как вам? 🤛- Можно мне так же… ❤️- Хуесос

custom 522915957664909308136custom 497250464041638362715custom 53596223392962561654custom 54407628829271271711

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @freeGiftsJoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 873,223 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Логово Joe 🎁🔪” (@freeGiftsJoe), 1,406 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freeGiftsJoe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.