Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@fredror | GRAM Community

@fredror_ton

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,593subscribers

+576 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002391079207
TypeChannel
Usernames@fredror_ton @nftcis
DescriptionКанал сообщества GRAM (TON) Владелец: @fredror Обо мне: @fredrorhub
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fredror_ton

Growth

11,01611,59311,304.56 August 2026 — 11,017 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,016 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,016 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,098 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,098 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,098 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,118 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,171 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,237 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,241 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,323 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,323 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,402 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,468 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,551 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,551 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,593 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
18 measurements spanning 7 days, net +576. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,929–11,680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:5711,593+42
12 Aug 2026, 08:3811,551no change
12 Aug 2026, 03:1211,551+83
11 Aug 2026, 09:0811,468+66
11 Aug 2026, 01:0511,402+79
10 Aug 2026, 06:1811,323no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:2211,323+82
9 Aug 2026, 05:1111,241+4
9 Aug 2026, 03:5211,237+66
8 Aug 2026, 07:2511,171no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:1111,171+53
7 Aug 2026, 10:2511,118+20
7 Aug 2026, 04:1511,098no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:0611,098no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:1511,098+82
6 Aug 2026, 02:3711,016no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:2011,016-1
6 Aug 2026, 00:5611,017first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 11,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,590
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total17,940
Reactions total184
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
257
Videos
36
Links
186

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

570 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15126.5%
13824.2%
🤯6611.6%
😱5810.2%
❤‍🔥518.95%
👍478.25%
👀366.32%
🎉122.11%
🤝81.40%
💘30.526%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 570reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
59
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fredror_ton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC≈3,250 views54 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Владелец канала @telelakel связался с командой App Store, где ему сказали что Telegram не числится как удалённый внутри системы. Следовательно самый логичный вариант — корневое обновление Telegram. Спите спокойно) @fredror_ton

🔥2415🤝8🎉6😱1

4 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC≈3,350 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026

‼️ Приложение telegram удалено из всех регионов App Store. От себя добавлю, что паниковать не стоит. Вероятнее всего загружается обновление, требующее повторной загрузки телеграм в App Store. @fredror_ton

😱17👀5🤯41

15 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC≈4,180 views35 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

📱 У ILYAREMIX сейчас проходит ивент по сжиганию стикеров с возможностью выиграть призы. ✨ Если у вас лежат стикеры мертвым грузом — это хорошая возможность избавиться от них и поучаствовать в розыгрыше.

🔥17❤‍🔥10🤯4🎉2👀2

14 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC≈4,280 views49 reactions12 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📰 GOYCHIK: глобальный релиз 📢 Еще около 2х месяцев назад я писал вам про коллекцию GOYCHIK, так вот, ребята выпустили свою аппку @GoychikAppBot, в которой можно будет купить бокс с их NFT. 🔎 Давно наблюдаю за флексом и за тем как он строит свой продукт, мне нравится его подход и трепетность, так что от себя могу посоветовать присмотреться к проекту, канал со всеми новостями — @officialgoychik @fredror_ton

24👍13🔥12

14 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,880 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Домен t.me вернулся и снова работает. @fredror_ton

🔥96🎉4

13 Jul 2026, 23:15 UTC≈2,270 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✈ Изменения уже применены внутри интерфейса телеграм. При создании нового канала / чата ссылка отображается как telegram.me

🤯13👀7😱4

13 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC≈1,580 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚫 Ушла эпоха ссылки t.me 😉 В коде теперь ссылка выглядит как telegram.me 🎁 Вероятнее всего нововведение временное, до тех пор пока не поднимут домен t.me @fredror_ton

🤯11😱5👀3👍1

13 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,790 views19 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍10🔥8🤯1

12 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,140 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Пока фрагмент забанили в Беларуси, звезды всегда можно купить по самым низким ценам в @TheOpenMoneyBot

🔥12❤‍🔥5👍4

6 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC≈3,090 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎙 Если бы вам выпала возможность задать ОДИН вопрос Павлу Дурову, что бы вы спросили? 🗺 Пишите свои варианты в комментарии. Возможно самые интересные дойдут до Павла Валерьевича. @fredror_ton

🔥179🤯6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fredror_ton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 628,243 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@fredror | GRAM Community” (@fredror_ton), 11,593 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fredror_ton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.