Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

📶无限时电波台

@freakoliver

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001876825979
TypeChannel
Username@freakoliver
DescriptionLeche's Lonely Planet
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/freakoliver

Growth

177 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 20:3117no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:1017first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.0%
avg views ÷ 17 subscribers
Avg views / post
8.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held12 (16 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total26
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
516
Links
566

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026

#log 据报道:OpenRouter 上近五成美国公司使用中国 AI 模型 朋友圈:绞尽脑汁想尽办法用上Claude、GPT

8 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC12 viewsread 11 August 2026

#log 周围很多人是不炒股的(哪怕是在一线互联网公司工作);很多人只拿出流动资产的10%或者10万块以下在炒股;很多人的风险偏好很低,不能接受本金亏损。 但在A股,不炒不亏,也不是坏事。 另,炒股的朋友对于我的钱70%在股票/ETF表示震惊。

7 Jul 2026, 04:41 UTC12 viewsread 11 August 2026

#log 未来的阶层鸿沟将从‘财产多寡’演变为‘物种差异’。富人以算力为权杖,以长生为冠冕,演化为‘神人’;而留给底层的,只剩下算法量身定制的‘奶头乐’。 这是AI说的……

25 Jun 2026, 02:41 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026

#log 昨天和朋友聊天,她说她6成仓中概,现在还没有换仓。我本来也重仓中概,从5月份才开始割,美团、拼多多、恒生科技、中概互联…每一项都-20%起,好在换仓及时,现在亏得都兜回来了,虽然今年总的看还没怎么赚到钱,但如果不割,今年就是亏损30%以上。有时候你以为的好公司+长期持有+低估买入,可能第一条就错了,选择大于努力😂

21 Jun 2026, 12:00 UTC12 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#log 平武报恩寺的细节丰富精美,看不过来

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @freakoliver. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,296,824 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📶无限时电波台” (@freakoliver), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freakoliver.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.