Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,229–19,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 05:18
19,261
-8
15 Sept 2026, 23:58
19,269
-5
14 Sept 2026, 09:21
19,274
-12
12 Sept 2026, 15:15
19,286
-8
10 Sept 2026, 14:01
19,294
-14
7 Sept 2026, 11:36
19,308
-21
4 Sept 2026, 16:20
19,329
-9
3 Sept 2026, 01:15
19,338
-6
2 Sept 2026, 02:45
19,344
-3
1 Sept 2026, 00:08
19,347
-2
30 Aug 2026, 23:54
19,349
-6
29 Aug 2026, 21:36
19,355
+1
28 Aug 2026, 23:27
19,354
-5
28 Aug 2026, 00:57
19,359
-7
26 Aug 2026, 22:06
19,366
-7
25 Aug 2026, 21:02
19,373
-9
24 Aug 2026, 21:47
19,382
-7
23 Aug 2026, 08:16
19,389
-19
21 Aug 2026, 16:16
19,408
-5
20 Aug 2026, 15:24
19,413
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25m 08s
Average length
6m 17s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,427 reactions across 23 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
548
38.4%
❤
512
35.9%
💯
200
14.0%
👏
57
3.99%
🔥
44
3.08%
🙏
26
1.82%
🤓
10
0.701%
🥰
8
0.561%
🏆
6
0.42%
🎉
4
0.28%
👌
4
0.28%
🤝
4
0.28%
🤩
4
0.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 23 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fraudedunomlegal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🏴☠️ ILS ONT CRÉÉ LE SYSTÈME. ILS VIVENT DE TOI.
Regarde bien l’image. D’un côté, les ressources essentielles : l’eau, la terre, l’énergie, ce dont l’être humain a besoin pour vivre. De l’autre, une succession de loyers, crédits, factures, assurances, taxes et dettes qui transforment chaque mois en nouvelle échéance.
On finit tellement par s’habituer à payer pour tout qu’on ne questionne même plus le mécanisme. Tra…
🏴☠️ BRIGITTE BARDOT : NE JAMAIS SIGNER DE CONTRAT
Brigitte Bardot n’a jamais signé aucun de ses contrats.
Et cette information prend une tout autre dimension lorsqu’on comprend la logique du consentement, du contrat et de la signature.
✍️ Signer, ce n’est pas simplement écrire son nom au bas d’une feuille.
La signature matérialise une acceptation.
Le système adore banaliser le geste :
« C’est juste une formalit…
🏆 ENCORE UNE VICTOIRE FACE AU TRÉSOR PUBLIC !
💰 3 428 € remboursés.
Et surtout : plus rien à payer au titre des revenus 2025.
Une nouvelle fois, les résultats parlent d’eux-mêmes.
📚 Ceux qui se forment avancent.
🧠 Ceux qui comprennent les mécanismes savent mieux défendre leurs intérêts.
📑 Ceux qui passent à l’action obtiennent des résultats.
Pendant que certains restent spectateurs, d’autres apprennent, appliquen…
⚡️ Et si la plus grande arnaque n'était pas le prix de l'énergie... mais le fait de t'avoir fait croire que tu devais payer toute ta vie ? 🤔
Depuis toujours, on nous raconte que...
🛢️ Le pétrole est une ressource rare.
⚡ L'électricité doit être facturée.
💸 Les prix augmentent parce qu'il y aurait des pénuries.
Pourtant, il y a une toute autre lecture.
Le pétrole n'est pas d'origine fossile mais abiotique, et des …
🇨🇦🏴☠️ #Recensement | Le consentement n'est pas un détail.
Avant de signer quoi que ce soit, rappelle-toi qu'une signature peut produire des effets juridiques. Lis, comprends et vérifie toujours ce qui t'est présenté.
📜 Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme (1948)
Article 1
« Tous les êtres humains naissent libres et égaux en dignité et en droits. »
Article 2
« Chacun peut se prévaloir de tous les droits …
🚨 Pourquoi l'État écrit-il ton NOM en MAJUSCULES ? 🤔
Et si ce n'était pas un simple choix de mise en page...
Le NOM inscrit en majuscules représente une entité administrative utilisée dans les relations avec les institutions.
📌 Tu découvriras notamment :
✅ La différence entre l'être humain et la personne juridique.
✅ Pourquoi les administrations, banques, tribunaux ou impôts utilisent ton NOM.
✅ Le rôle attribu…
RÉSUMÉ POUR LES NOUVEAUX🏴☠️🦜
Imagine un immense jeu vidéo 🎮
Le jour où tu nais, le système te crée un personnage :
un NOM, un numéro, des papiers, un dossier administratif.
➡️ Cet avatar peut :
🎮 payer des impôts,
🎮 recevoir des amendes,
🎮 avoir des dettes,
🎮 signer des contrats,
🎮 être contrôlé par les règles du “jeu”.
Et la plupart des gens grandissent en croyant : “Je SUIS ce personnage.”
Alors ils jouent to…
🏴☠️ Ton acte de naissance ne certifie pas ta vie, il officialise ton contrôle.
Depuis toujours, on t'apprend que ce document est la preuve de ton existence.
Pourtant, avais-tu besoin d'un papier pour respirer, grandir ou exister ?
L'être humain est vivant par nature. Le document, lui, sert à l'enregistrement administratif.
La vraie question n'est donc pas : « Ai-je un acte de naissance ? »
Mais plutôt :
Pourqu…
🏴☠️ ET SI LE PROBLÈME N’ÉTAIT PAS LE TAUX… MAIS LE PRINCIPE ?
On nous répète depuis l’école que l’impôt est « normal », « nécessaire » et même « inévitable ».
Mais combien se demandent : 👉 Pourquoi ce qui était présenté comme exceptionnel est devenu permanent ? 👉 Pourquoi la création monétaire repose aujourd’hui essentiellement sur la dette ? 👉 Pourquoi chaque crise se traduit par plus de prélèvements, plus de con…
❤40👍15🔥11
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @fraudedunomlegal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚓️ Fraude du nom legal (canal d'information)” (@fraudedunomlegal), 19,261 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fraudedunomlegal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
