• Chat Incognito CAM • È il miglior sito di VIDEO DIRETTE PORNO amatoriali 😏 con Ragazze ITA 🇮🇹 arrapate 🔥 👉 https://t.me/+IkNe8V1DhO1jMWQ8 👉 https://t.me/+IkNe8V1DhO1jMWQ8
❤12🔥5

Channel
@francyloverossireal
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
12,258subscribers
-209 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001795326261 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @francyloverossireal |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/francyloverossireal |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @francyloverossireal/632 · this entry14 May 2026, 17:35 UTC | @francyrossireal/43514 May 2026, 19:40 UTC | 1.00 | 2.1 hours |
| @francyloverossireal/633 · this entry26 May 2026, 13:52 UTC | @francyrossireal/43626 May 2026, 13:52 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @francyloverossireal/634 · this entry9 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC | @francyrossireal/4379 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @francyloverossireal/636 · this entry11 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC | @francyrossireal/43811 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @francyloverossireal/638 · this entry17 Jun 2026, 15:51 UTC | @francyrossireal/44017 Jun 2026, 15:51 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @francyloverossireal/642 · this entry23 Jun 2026, 14:13 UTC | @francyrossireal/44324 Jun 2026, 13:20 UTC | 1.00 | 23 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @francyrossireal | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (10–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 April 2026 to 28 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @francyloverossireal — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 12,258 | -7 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 12,265 | -14 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 12,279 | -34 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 12,313 | -20 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 12,333 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 12,343 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 12,354 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 12,359 | +15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 12,344 | -15 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 12,359 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 12,364 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:53 | 12,365 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 12,366 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 12,382 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 12,387 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 12,398 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 12,397 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 12,392 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 12,404 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 12,412 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,526 reactions across 21 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 770 | 50.5% | |
| 🔥 | 512 | 33.6% | |
| 🍌 | 97 | 6.36% | |
| ❤🔥 | 46 | 3.01% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 1.25% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 1.18% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 0.852% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 0.524% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 0.524% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.393% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.262% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.262% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 0.197% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 0.197% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.197% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 0.197% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.197% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.131% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,526 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• Chat Incognito CAM • È il miglior sito di VIDEO DIRETTE PORNO amatoriali 😏 con Ragazze ITA 🇮🇹 arrapate 🔥 👉 https://t.me/+IkNe8V1DhO1jMWQ8 👉 https://t.me/+IkNe8V1DhO1jMWQ8
❤12🔥5
Giulia Leopardi: il 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓸 più bello di Onlyfans?🥵 Non ti farà mancare niente: fa di tutto e di più 🥵 - coppia - squirt - cam - threesome E molto altro.. 😏💦 ONLYFANS ➡️https://onlyfans.com/chibiblondie Telegram ➡️ https://t.me/+EBNBNfFJohRjODYy
❤10🔥8
Passeggiata mattutina 💦 quest'anno le vacanze le sto passando in un campeggio particolare 🙈 https://onlyfans.com/francyloverossi ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
❤74🔥39🍌13❤🔥10⚡2🍾2👍2👌1
Francyloverossi 🇮🇹❤️ pinned a video
Ecco quello che è successo con il MASSAGIATORE 💕 sua MOGLIE mi ha chiesto di indagare ma la situazione è andata fuori controllo... lui ci ha provato fin dall'inizio 😅 direi che non è un MARITO FEDELE ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://onlyfans.com/francyloverossi Il video completo è fuori ora (la MOGLIE sa tutto) sul mio onlyfans 💕 riguardate i post precedenti se vi siete persi quello che è successo
❤49🔥32🍌14😁7❤🔥4🌭2
Mi sono trovata con il MARITO massaggiatore della MOGLIE che mi ha contattata per vedere se è fedele 🙈 Riguardate i post precedenti... Io sono SCIOCCATA 🙌 appena mi riprendo vi posto quello che è successo...
❤40🔥22😱6
Domani ho preso appuntamento con il marito MASSAGIATORE... sarà fedele? 🙈 Riguardate i POST PRECEDENTI se vi siete persi quello che mi ha detto SUA MOGLIE 💕 Vi aggiornerò nel canale qui sotto ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/+naggVdPQZ5U3Mzk0 ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
❤28🔥16❤🔥4😍3😱2💋1
Mi sono trovata con la ragazza di ieri 😱 SENTITE COSA DICE 😱 cosa faccio ragazzi? Provo a fare la detective? Vi aggiorno ❤️ HO MODIFICATO LA VOCE DELLA RAGAZZA per privacy
❤21👍9😁4🤯1
AUDIO ON 🇮🇹 mi ha contattato una RAGAZZA su instagram... ha paura che il MARITO vada con altre 😱 in questi giorni la conosco e vediamo cosa vuole chiedermi 💕 il mio profilo Instagram privato ⬇️ https://www.instagram.com/francyloverossi?igsh=MTBtMGtzb2o4cHQ1ag== ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ Ovviamente ho dovuto MODIFICARE la voce della ragazza per privacy 💕 vi aggiorno
❤21🤩1
⚠️⚠️⚠️ ATTENZIONE ⚠️ io NON faccio mai nulla tramite PayPal/bonifico o altri pagamenti al di fuori dei miei siti ufficiali ⚠️ NON pagate nessuno che si spaccia per me su telegram ⚠️ ATTENZIONE ⚠️ NON ho contatti telegram privati ⚠️ Gli account @francesca e @francy NON SONO IO. Ha RUBATO LE MIE FOTO DENUNCIATE subito a telegram questi due account, segnalateli a telegram e non fatevi fregare Io uso SOLO i miei siti u…
❤20
Oggi c'è un SUPER REGALO 🤩 ho appena pubblicato GRATIS IN HOME sul mio onlyfans questo VIDEO di tutto quello che è successo con la RAGAZZA CUCK e i due cazzi che sono arrivati dopo 🙈 https://onlyfans.com/francyloverossi ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
🔥39❤19🍌11👏2🤯1
LA CORNUTA - the CUCKOLD QUEAN 😱 riguardate i post precedenti ❤️ una ragazza amatoriale mi contatta per la sua PRIMA ESPERIENZA CUCK 🙈 alla fine succede un disastro e finisco con DUE CAZZONI PER ME 💦 ho caricato i DUE VIDEO COMPLETI anche qui sotto ⬇️⬇️ https://t.pretopay.com/Francyloverossi/checkout/6icma1ybghmx Avrete accesso al canale VIP telegram con i DUE VIDEO COMPLETI 💦 tutto su telegram, anonimo, sicuro e S…
🔥57❤27🥰6🍌4🍓1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @francyloverossireal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Francyloverossi 🇮🇹❤️” (@francyloverossireal), 12,258 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/francyloverossireal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.