Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CompetenzeDigitali

Channel

CompetenzeDigitali

@francescocostanzini

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

148subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001086040831
TypeChannel
Username@francescocostanzini
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/francescocostanzini

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

148151149.57 August 2026 — 151 subscribers8 August 2026 — 151 subscribers9 September 2026 — 149 subscribers3 October 2026 — 148 subscribers7 August 20263 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 57 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148–151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 16:01148-1
9 Sept 2026, 13:00149-2
8 Aug 2026, 19:46151no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:10151first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍266.7%
🤩133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC14 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Accettare tutto è comodo. Almeno sapere che cosa hai accettato, però, cambia le cose.

7 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Non serve essere esperti per verificare. Serve chiedere chi lo dice, e con quali numeri.

6 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Le notizie vecchie tornano a girare come nuove, di solito d'estate. La data è la prima cosa.

5 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Se lo stesso messaggio ti arriva da cinque persone, non diventa cinque volte più vero.

4 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Quando condividi ci metti la faccia tu. Vale la pena sapere cosa c'è scritto.

3 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Non è detto che sia la foto ad essere ritoccata. È la storia che ci mettono intorno a essere falsa.

2 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Su internet ci sono tutte le fonti del mondo, comprese quelle che si inventano tutto. Dire dove l'hai letto vuol dire dire chi lo scrive

👍2

1 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Da oggi e per tutto il mese di Agosto parte una nuova rubrica di vignette: una al giorno. Buona estate! Il titolo serve a farti cliccare. La riga sotto, spesso, dice un'altra cosa.

🤩1

31 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

🛠 Tool: Upscayl Upscayl è un programma gratuito e open source che ingrandisce le immagini a bassa risoluzione usando l'intelligenza artificiale, ricostruendo il dettaglio invece di sgranare tutto. Serve quando hai una vecchia foto di famiglia troppo piccola per essere stampata, un logo che sullo schermo si sfoca, un'immagine salvata anni fa e oggi inservibile. Il vantaggio vero è che lavora sul tuo computer: le im…

30 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026

📚 Teoria letteraria per robot di Dennis Yi Tenen Il sottotitolo dice già molto: come i computer hanno imparato a scrivere. L'autore insegna letteratura comparata alla Columbia ed è stato ingegnere in Microsoft. Una lettura che può aiutare a guardare l'AI generativa da più lontano, risalendo la storia lunga di dizionari, automi e macchine per comporre testi che ha portato fin qui. Può essere interessante per chi us…

29 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026

⚖️ AI in pratica: capire quale offerta conviene davvero Due preventivi per la stessa cosa. Sulla carta sembrano quasi uguali, e la differenza sta sempre in fondo, scritta piccola. L'AI può metterli a confronto voce per voce e tirare fuori i costi che non avevi notato. 🔹 Prompt utile: "Ti incollo due offerte per luce / telefonia / assicurazione. Confrontale in una tabella voce per voce, evidenzia costi di attivazio…

28 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026

✍️ La bolla dei filtri: perché vedi proprio quello che vedi Ogni volta che apri un social, qualcuno ha già deciso cosa mostrarti per primo. Non per farti un dispetto, ma per tenerti lì il più a lungo possibile. In questo articolo racconto come si forma quella bolla intorno a te, e soprattutto cosa smetti di vedere senza accorgertene. ⚡ Leggi l'articolo. ⚡ Fammi sapere cosa ne pensi. #competenzedigitali #franzcos …

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @francescocostanzini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CompetenzeDigitali” (@francescocostanzini), 148 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/francescocostanzini.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.