4 measurements spanning 16 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 17:47
86
+2
16 Aug 2026, 02:06
84
-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:32
86
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:20
86
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
166 reactions across 6 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
103
62.0%
🤩
20
12.0%
🔥
10
6.02%
🆒
9
5.42%
⚡
6
3.61%
❤🔥
4
2.41%
💔
4
2.41%
🙏
4
2.41%
😭
2
1.20%
🤯
2
1.20%
😁
1
0.602%
🤔
1
0.602%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 6 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @francaisealaise. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 November 2025 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Поговорим о неприятном
Недавно в онлайн-школе меня уведомили о том, что моя ученица уходит на перерыв. С ней мы занимались 3 месяца по 3 раза в неделю. Она была вовлечена в занятия, говорила, что ей весело и интересно. А мне было легко и приятно готовиться к урокам с ней. Мы прошли половину учебника А1 за это время, и к концу сентября я рассчитывала дойти до конца SpeakOut А1. Она подключалась к урокам и в поездках,…
Я уволилась со своей fancy работы 😱
Потом месяц ничего не делала🙂↕️, потом полтора месяца искала новую работу (на каких собесах я только не была😵💫). А потом вернулась к преподаванию (+5 новых учеников с английским своих и от школы). Но уже не с мыслью «это что, всё, на что я способна?», а с мыслью «я хороша в этом и я выбираю это делать!»
Терапия медленно, но верно даёт свои плоды🥳. Мне не так трудно говорить о с…
Часть 2
Помощник генерального директора
Разброс по поиску работы был от стюардессы до переводчика. Критерии отбора были: зарплата, устройство по ТК, 2 языка и очная работа (от дистанта мне хотелось лезть на стенку весь прошлый год). Чёткого плана и большого финансового запаса у меня не было, но мне повезло, и буквально через неделю после приезда я нашла в Питере работу через hh.
Звучало пафосно: «помощник генеральн…
Откуда вообще взялась моя новая работа? Я переехала в Питер из-за неё? И что там с преподаванием?
Всё это логичные вопросы, особенно от тех, кто немного знаком с моим «лором». Начнём с начала. Прямо с самого
Часть 1
Всё было плохо
В июле я получила отказ по шенгенской визе (кто не в курсе, вот подробности: https://vk.com/wall-221904308_650) по программе-аналогу Work and Travel только во Франции.
У меня тогда пога…
✍🏻 Заметки о работе с инстранцами
Прошло 3 недели, как я работаю в Питере в компании RACUS, помогающей иностранным студентам поступать в российские вузы. За это время в рамках очной работы с иностранцами я 2 раза встречала студентов в аэропорту с коллегами, 1 раз сопровождала во время продления виз и других процедур с документами, а вчера был первый раз, когда я встречала студента в аэропорту самостоятельно (мол уже…
Получилось
За прошедшие 3,5 недели я успела:
📃 Написать САЕ в Казахстане. Вчера пришли результаты. Grade B! Я очень собой горжусь. Теперь я официально «смотря какой fabric, смотря сколько details в этом пиджаке»💅🏻. Это мой второй С1, первый я сдавала год назад, это был французский
🏠 Переехать в Питер. Снимаю на юге фиолетовой ветки. Мне очень повезло с квартирой. Это огромная светлая двушка со всем, что только мож…
❤25🤩7🆒4
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @francaisealaise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“française à l’aise” (@francaisealaise), 86 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/francaisealaise.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.