Channel
@foxynew
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
115,851subscribers
-415 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001486981915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @foxynew |
| Created | 18 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/foxynew |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 115,851 | -75 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 115,926 | -94 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 116,020 | -76 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 116,096 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 116,128 | -76 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 116,204 | -62 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 116,266 | first reading |
118 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 872,240 |
| Reactions total | 4,753 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,753 reactions across 118 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤯 | 1,745 | 36.7% | |
| 👍 | 1,415 | 29.8% | |
| 👎 | 632 | 13.3% | |
| 🤡 | 589 | 12.4% | |
| 🤮 | 191 | 4.02% | |
| 😁 | 181 | 3.81% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,753reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Україна визначила нові цілі в РФ для далекобійних ударів — Зеленський Україна вже визначила нові цілі на території росії та готується до подальшого застосування далекобійної й середньодальної зброї. За словами Зеленського, робота в цьому напрямку триватиме. Подписаться
👍16🤡5
ℹ️ Близько 30 ракет можуть готувати для удару по Києву — розвідка США ⏺За даними американської розвідки, протягом найближчих 48 годин існує висока загроза балістичного удару по Києву та області. ⏺РФ може застосувати до 30 ракет типів «Іскандер-М», С-400, KN-23 та «Циркон». ⏺Не виключено, що атака на столицю буде частиною масштабного удару по Україні. Подписаться
🤯27👎6
❗️Мобілізаційний вік можуть знизити до 21 року, якщо в рф призвуть 500 тис. росіян, – військовослужбовець 56-ї окремої мотопіхотної бригади Гнезділов. Можливо, почнуть готувати передумови до жіночої мобілізації. Подписаться
👎45🤡33🤯16👍10
🅿️ Одеса - КР Бандероль на місто / Порт Подписаться
🤯13👎1
⏺ За тиждень в Україні накрили 94 шахрайські кол-центри СБУ та Нацполіція провели 411 обшуків і припинили діяльність мережі кол-центрів. Правоохоронці вилучили 3336 одиниць техніки, понад 5200 SIM-карток, 1346 телефонів, 22 авто та близько $2 млн готівки. Також знайшли банківські картки, крипторахунки та кілограм банківського золота. Шахраї виманювали гроші під виглядом «безпеки банку», фейкових інвестицій, кредит…
👍14😁5
Одеса мінус, загроза керованих ракет зберігається. Подписаться
🤯12👎3
🚨 ТРИВОГА В КИЄВІ Загроза ударних БпЛА UPD: 14:20 - відбій повітряної тривоги Подписаться
🤯8👎3
⚠️ Борт ДА Ту-22м3 у напрямку Криму. Загроза пусків Х-22/32 для Одещини. Подписаться
👎15
❗️Студентам можуть суттєво підняти стипендії вже з 1 вересня В Україні пропонують збільшити виплати вдвічі: ▫️ мінімальна — 4 000 грн ▫️ академічна — 5 820 грн ▫️ галузева — 7 420 грн ▫️ президентська — 20 000 грн Про це повідомили у підкомітеті ВРУ з питань молоді та спорту. Подписаться
👍14🤯10😁1
🚨 ТРИВОГА В КИЄВІ Загроза ударних БпЛА UPD: 10:10 - відбій Подписаться
👎8🤯2
😔 Кількість жертв землетрусу в Колумбії зросла до 254 осіб, — пише Reuters. Людей і досі шукають під завалами знищених будинків. Район Чоко, який неподалік від епіцентру землетрусу, наразі знеструмлений. Подписаться
🤯15👎4
❗️ Добрі дрони цієї ночі знову працювали на повну ▪️Новоросійськ понад 5 годин перебував під атакою БпЛА: через роботу ППО пошкоджено житлові будинки та комбінат хлібопродуктів. Також повідомляють про пожежі біля порту. ▪️Крим цієї ночі також атакували дрони: вибухи чули в Севастополі, Керчі, Ялті та Євпаторії. У кількох районах зникло світло, працювала ППО. Гучно було поблизу аеродромів «Бельбек» і «Кача», а тако…
👍67🤡5
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @foxynew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@foxynew edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 209,473 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOXY NEWS 🦊” (@foxynew), 115,851 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxynew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.