5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,405–1,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 09:24
1,603
+18
11 Aug 2026, 09:28
1,585
+122
8 Aug 2026, 19:54
1,463
+32
7 Aug 2026, 22:03
1,431
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:50
1,431
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 1,603 subscribers
Avg views / post
223
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
11 (1 May 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
891
Reactions total
206
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
311 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
101
32.5%
❤
77
24.8%
👍
62
19.9%
😁
27
8.68%
❤🔥
21
6.75%
🤯
6
1.93%
🎉
4
1.29%
🙏
4
1.29%
😢
3
0.965%
🍌
2
0.643%
👀
2
0.643%
😨
2
0.643%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎁РОЗЫГРЫШ КОЛОБКОВ ОТ FOX x HARDHOOKAH🎁
Решили порадовать Вас с ребятами этой бомбовой новинкой. Чашка в форме колобка, всего их три разных вида. Вот мы и решили разыграть три штуки для Вас. Каждому победителю прикатиться рандомный колобок!🤪
✊ТРИ СЧАСТЛИВЧИКА, станут обладателями этой чашки😀
✍️Условия самые простые:
1. Подписаться на HARD HOOKAH
2. Подписаться на Fox Hookah
3. Поставить реакции на предыдущие и нов…
Новинка, которую многие ждали после JCFest, уже в продаже!
Представляем чашу «Колобок» от Fox Hookah - яркую новинку, которая точно станет центром внимания в любой кальянной коллекции.
Теперь она доступна в двух вариантах:
😎 в очках - для тех, кто любит стиль и харизму;
😏 без очков - с той самой фирменной хитрой улыбкой.
Чаша выполнена из белой глины (немецкий шликер), покрыта глазурью и рассчитана на 18-23 г таба…
Вот такой у нас сегодня отзыв от наших партнеров, спасибо за упоминание, индустрия в хороших руках💪🏼
Будем и дальше радовать вас качеством и красотой ассортимента🔥
Spectrum о партнёрах: знакомьтесь, FOX! 🦊
Как вы знаете, в этом году на JCF мы участвовали совместно с нашими друзьями и партнерами. Мы решили запустить серию постов, чтобы рассказать о них подробнее и показать, с какими крутыми брендами мы делаем одно дело!
И начнём мы с компании FOX.
Свой путь ребята начали в 2018 году с выпуска чаш из красной глины. А уже в 2019-м на HCS громко заявили о себе, презентовав перву…
JCFest завершен, а эмоции остаются 🦊💨
Было ярко, шумно, дымно и по-настоящему круто. Спасибо всем, кто заглянул к нам на стенд, познакомился с FOX поближе и разделил этот день вместе с нами.
Фотоотчет уже готов, посмотреть все кадры с фестиваля можно по ссылке.
Сохраняем лучшие моменты в памяти и ждем новых встреч, друзья! 🦊🔥
FOX на JCFest 2026 🦊🔥
Уже 11 июля в Москве встретимся на одном из главных дымных событий лета!
В этом году фестиваль проходит в русском стиле, а мы готовим свой стенд, хорошее настроение и особенную новинку — первую фигурную чашу FOX «Колобок».
Приходите знакомиться, общаться и увидеть всё своими глазами.
Ждём вас у FOX на стенде 70🦊💨
11 июля • Москва, НКП «Русь»
Также на нашем стенде вы сможете попробовать новые вкусы табака Spectrum, которые представят наши партнеры. Приходите здороваться, общаться и пробовать!🦊
Приобрести билеты можно на сайте
FOX вновь на JCFest 🦊
В эту субботу будем в Москве на ежегодном фестивале, где встречаются бренды, новинки, идеи и люди, которые живут кальянной культурой.
В этом году тема – русский стиль, и мы подготовили кое-что особенное.
Не просто новую форму, а персонажа с характером, которого точно захочется рассмотреть вживую.
Приходите на наш стенд: познакомимся, покажем новинку, пообщаемся и просто хорошо проведём этот д…
Поздравляем с Днем России 🇷🇺
Желаем благополучия в каждом доме и больше поводов радоваться простым вещам.
Пусть любовь к Родине проявляется в добрых делах, уважении к традициям и желании делать жизнь вокруг лучше.
С праздником, дорогие соотечественники! ❤️🦊
Часть 1. Как чуть не потеряли 3 миллиона рублей 🦊
Решили мы серьезно усилить производство и открыть отдельный цех по лазерной обработке металла.
Заказали оборудование под наши задачи: лазерный станок B-Power с труборезом, чтобы резать листовой металл до 30 мм, работать с цветным металлом, делать пазы, отверстия и сложные элементы на круглых и квадратных трубах.
К нему листогибочный станок, компрессор, вытяжка и ещ…
С 1 мая, лисицы и лисы 🦊
Пусть этот день будет про отдых, простые радости и хорошую компанию. Когда никуда не спешишь, собираешь своих людей рядом и просто наслаждаешься моментом.
Тёплой весны, легкого настроения и, конечно, густого дыма под вечер 💨
👍6❤3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @foxhookahs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,099,942 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@foxhookahs named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hardhookahchannel named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOX Hookah” (@foxhookahs), 1,603 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxhookahs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
