Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

foxhole

@foxhole_072

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,344subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001874035289
TypeChannel
Username@foxhole_072
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/foxhole_072

Growth

5,3415,3475,3447 August 2026 — 5,347 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,346 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,341 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,344 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,340–5,348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:255,344+3
10 Aug 2026, 19:455,341-5
8 Aug 2026, 00:055,346-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:305,347first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,936 reactions across 13 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,43143.2%
🔥1,62520.5%
❤‍🔥1,59320.1%
🍓4355.48%
🥰2192.76%
💘2112.66%
🎉1061.34%
💋951.20%
😭650.819%
😁590.743%
👍160.202%
🙊100.126%
🤔100.126%
👾80.101%
🕊80.101%
70.088%
👏70.088%
😱70.088%
👎40.05%
🤯40.05%
7 further kinds160.202%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,936reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 13:26 UTC≈8,700 views1,017 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Мне едва хватило сил на эту анимацию, вот честно

529🔥217❤‍🔥167😭65🍓107👍6💘6

2 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC≈8,510 views427 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Продолжение рубрики "никогда не угадаю, что она выкинет в след раз" Ну а вообще это моя детская гипер фиксация, знакомьтесь. До сих пор не попустило. Всей душой уважаю Алана и его команду, а последний серия вообще на повал🫠

🔥202136🥰52💘21❤‍🔥11🍓3👾1😁1

27 May 2026, 18:09 UTC≈13,000 views945 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

У чувака реально би паника

496🔥225💘134🥰34❤‍🔥24💋8🍓7👍6

25 May 2026, 06:35 UTC≈13,600 views914 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В этот раз у него не удалось сбежать🤭

482🔥235🎉105❤‍🔥59💘10🍓9💋7😁3

18 May 2026, 09:29 UTC≈9,220 views611 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Спустя три года думаю пора наконец-то признать, что мне нравиться рисовать этого гада. Ну захотелось мне по приколу нарисовать фембойчика Рико, ну и что вы мне сделаете?🙄

❤‍🔥317182🍓75😁23💘5💋3🔥3👎2

14 May 2026, 21:14 UTC≈11,900 views920 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Просто немного атмосферной анимации с ключевыми этапами жизни Нила🤲🏻

🔥389❤‍🔥287178🍓40💋6💘6🥰6👏5

30 Apr 2026, 06:22 UTC≈9,270 views329 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Впринцыпе уже похуй что хавать

201❤‍🔥71💋37💘12🤷‍♀3🍓2🔥1🕊1

30 Apr 2026, 06:22 UTC≈10,200 views659 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Я....ладно, у меня нету оправданий, забейте Просто увидела пару эдитов с этими двоими и шутки ради сделала анимку. Мне было нужно как-то скоротать день

339❤‍🔥182🥰77😁25🤔10🔥7😱7💋5

29 Apr 2026, 10:32 UTC≈10,400 views550 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Руки наконец-то дошли до золотого ворона и вчера дочитала последнюю главу. Она была как бальзам на душу под конец тяжёлого дня и я не смогла удержаться от маленькой зарисовки Просто умилясь от взаимоотношений Жана и Баргламота. То, как он провел паралель с тем, что их обоих бросили, то, как собака сразу привязалась к нему и всячески наровила сесть тому на колени. Факт того, что Жан неосознанно выбрал эту же собаку,

❤‍🔥268160🍓69🔥33💘7💋6👍3😁2

23 Apr 2026, 14:27 UTC≈7,580 views564 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

По канону я все равно его представляю по другому, но люди... ХИР МИ АУТ

🔥261173🍓79❤‍🔥38💋3🆒3🍾2👏2

21 Apr 2026, 20:49 UTC≈6,920 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🍓6930🔥9❤‍🔥2💋1

21 Apr 2026, 20:48 UTC≈7,560 views361 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Еще кстати сегодня, будучи на парах, моя одногрупница дала попробовать порисовать на Айпаде Я резко осознала, что мне это жизненно необходимо. ГСПД, КАК ЖЕ ЭТО УДОБНО. На первые же заработаные деньги сразу куплю, клянусь(ну после тату разве что)

231🍓66🔥38❤‍🔥18🙊4💘3💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @foxhole_072. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 497,487 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“foxhole” (@foxhole_072), 5,344 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxhole_072.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.