Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Found This

@found_this

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,284subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001896630349
TypeChannel
Username@found_this
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/found_this

Growth

1,2791,2841,281.512 Aug 2026, 00:15 — 1,279 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 11:14 — 1,284 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 00:1512 Aug 2026, 11:14
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,278–1,285 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:141,284+5
12 Aug 2026, 00:151,279first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 1,284 subscribers
Avg views / post
194
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held14 (29 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total2,132
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1550.0%
930.0%
👍516.7%
😁13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC162 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A subscriber found this "list of useful tools for web-focused design engineers" https://designengineer.tools/ #Tools #Design #Web

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC84 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @software_guyPhoto

Episode 3 is finally here! 🎙️🔥 I sat down with Mulu Tsega aka Luna for a raw and fun conversation about LinkedIn, finding jobs and opportunities, building a personal brand, and her journey from coding to product management. Watch the full episode here 👇 🔗https://youtu.be/utJVxy2NnB0

👍2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @CoolioCodes

hey it's me Coolio, you might know me from the community hike events i've hosted multiple times. (one coming very soon aswell so join up) so i ..... deleted my channel by mistake. i was trying to delete a post and instead deleted the whole channel smh. anyways this is my new channel engdi. we keep going, we keep growing. share this around the community and lets keep the momentum going ❤️ @CoolioCodes

1

5 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC189 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

♟FOR THOSE WHO ARE SERIOUS ABOUT IMPROVING THEIR CHESS♟ Care to accelerate your chess journey? Skyrocket your progress and give yourself the best chance to achieve your lofty goals. Our coaching programs are designed around your level, your goals, and your journey. From mastering the fundamentals and tactical patterns to building opening repertoires, improving positional understanding, analyzing your games, and pre

5 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SoloDevChroniclesPhoto

Introducing EthioDeploy Deploying applications shouldn't require hours of server setup, DevOps knowledge, or an international credit card. We built this to make hosting simple for developers, startups, and businesses. Connect your GitHub repository, push your code, and your application is online in seconds. Here's what you get with EthioDeploy: 1. Automatic stack detection Works out of the box with Next.js, Re

🔥7

29 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC249 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @XcodeAndChillPhoto

Guess who’s back? https://t.me/Frosty_sirens

😁1

26 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @thebludragonPhoto

Our fellow student, Abel, urgently needs our help as he recovers from a severe injury. Let's come together as a school community to support him in his time of need. Please contribute whatever you can using the bank account in the poster above and share this post across your groups and networks to help spread the word. ​Every donation and share counts! 🙏

1

25 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC276 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Robi_makes_stuffPhoto

Here's the analysis of fees in ethiopian banks. The worst fees are from nib bank so far and the best fees are kinda dependent on how much you move. Disclaimer : some banks dont have enough messages to be sure about their fees so if a fee message hasn't been seen at least 3 times , that data is marked incomplete. use the site as a loose reference not as law 😂 https://fees.odit.et/ by @oditet and @rb_wk

🔥5

25 Jul 2026, 05:04 UTC238 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Robi_makes_stuffPhoto

fee analysis ... gonna release it today. so we can see which bank is the best for what amount of transfer.

14 Jul 2026, 20:15 UTC299 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @software_guyPhoto

🎙 Episode 1 is LIVE! Had an awesome conversation with Semer, Lead Engineer at Chapa, about his journey into software engineering, career growth, and Ethiopia's tech scene. 🇪🇹💻 Go check it out and let me know what you think! 🎥 https://youtu.be/cfs3J12NOGM

1🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 18:44 UTC449 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I’ve been using it for a couple of days now, and while there are some missing features from raycast, it’s still usable. Being opensource it has a huge plus.... https://www.vicinae.com/ #Launcher #Raycast #Opensource

4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @found_this. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 673,818 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Found This” (@found_this), 1,284 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/found_this.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.