Всем хорошего дня! Небольшая справка о том, что из себя представляет Арсенал
custom 53187833592943824991

Channel
@foruments_fut
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002663203809 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @foruments_fut |
| Description | Футбол и мемы. Серьёзно несерьёзный канал для связи: @Foruments |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 24 June 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/foruments_fut |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 26 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
89 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23 | 25.8% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 24.7% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 13.5% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5318783359294382499 | 9 | 10.1% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 7.87% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 6.74% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2025 to 24 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем хорошего дня! Небольшая справка о том, что из себя представляет Арсенал
custom 53187833592943824991
Один болельщик "Уимблдона" рассказал, что в 1995 году перед матчем с "Ноттингем Форест" на поле вывели слона, который сделал круг почета. Прошло 30 лет, а болельщики до сих пор не знают смысла того перформанса 🤷♂️
🤯4
Трамп шарит 😅
👍1
На стоячей трибуне знак "Не стоять"
👍2
Опа Всех с добрым утром!
🔥6👍1
Подборка классных сейвов, которые нашел @freezovsky Спасибо ему за это🙏 Всех с добрым утром!
custom 53187833592943824997🔥2
такой мем, остренький хах 😅
👍3
А как бы вы назвали в таком случае своего ребенка?🧐
🤯3👍1
При Антонио Конте Челси играл в формации 3-4-3, где ключевую роль играли вингбэки — они должны были одновременно растягивать поле в атаке и страховать фланги в обороне. Виктор Мозес идеально вписался в эту систему на правом фланге. Он обладал нужной скоростью, чтобы закрывать всю бровку — от своей штрафной до чужой. В атаке он создавал ширину, давал опции для паса, врывался за спину защитникам и растягивал оборону с…
👍5
⚡️ Диогу Жота погиб в автокатастрофе: футболисту «Ливерпуля» было 28 лет (Источник: Marca)
🕊6
Пеп Гвардиола про Челси при Томасе Тухеле: Почему «Челси» играет так хорошо? Потому что у них три центральных защитника ближе всех, два опорных полузащитника, смежные игроки ближе, закрывают близко. У них структура из пяти и двух игроков так, так близко. И расстояния так близки. И в то же время они такие широкие. Фланговые защитники, они так глубоко, с вертикальными движениями сзади. Поэтому ты не можешь быть близко…
👍4
Внимательно смотрим, палка указка именно для этого и создавалась. Если вы думаете, что геймплей в фифу именно такой, где вы стараетесь придумать тактику, забегания, перепасовки и игра в стенку, то нет. Чаще всего это какие-то заскриптованные забросы за спину, финты и мощный удар низом. В начале выхода каждой новой части геймплей вроде как нормальный, в режиме карьеры за тренера так точно все норм, но как только тебе…
😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @foruments_fut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“foruments” (@foruments_fut), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foruments_fut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.