Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fórum Redes Brasil

Channel

Fórum Redes Brasil

@forum_redes_brasil

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,866subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001747775423
TypeChannel
Username@forum_redes_brasil
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/forum_redes_brasil

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8611,8691,86516 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,862 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,866 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,869 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,867 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,865 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,863 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,866 subscribers1,86616 August 202614 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 28 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,860–1,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 00:001,866+3
10 Sept 2026, 16:161,863-2
5 Sept 2026, 17:401,865-2
30 Aug 2026, 02:531,867-2
23 Aug 2026, 17:591,869+3
20 Aug 2026, 11:321,866+4
17 Aug 2026, 11:331,862+1
16 Aug 2026, 15:001,861no change
16 Aug 2026, 14:451,861first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
450.0%
🤔337.5%
🔥112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 May 2026, 23:45 UTC806 views0 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1540, por Rômulo Andrade Pessoal, boa noite! Troquei de notebook: antes utilizava Windows e já tinha meu laboratório configurado. Agora estou usando macOS e gostaria de saber se alguém do grupo conseguiu instalar o VMware no Mac para rodar o laboratório. Envie sua duvida para @redes_brasil_bot

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

4 May 2026, 21:35 UTC829 viewsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1539, por Adeilton Oliveira Ola. Estou com uma OLT FIT NETWORKS, que está sem a firmware. Ela foi formatada, e não encontro a firmware na internet alguém poderia ajudar Envie sua duvida para @redes_brasil_bot

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

20 Mar 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,180 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1538, por Rennan Sant' Anna Estou com um problema no cliente, no qual possuo 2 APs 360 intelbras, funcionavam perfeitamente, até eu implantar o mikrotik rb3011. O equipamento esta configurado: Ethe1 - Modem da operadora Citta para funcionar como dhcp client - Recebendo IP 192.168.200.1 Ethe2 - Modem da operadora Telecall para funcionar como dhcp client - Recebendo IP 192.168.0.1 Ethe3 a

🤔31

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

19 Mar 2026, 23:31 UTC963 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1537, por Joao Top Boa noite! Pessoal me dêem umas dicas pra acessar um Mikrotik atrás de cgnat (RB750GR2). Envie sua duvida para @redes_brasil_bot

🔥1

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

12 Feb 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1528, por Alex Souza Boa tarde Temos uma antena SXT Lite 5 instalada num cliente, conectada a um ponto a ponto, usando configuração padrão de acesso. O problema e que atualmente o pppoe conecta e em seguida desconecta em seguida volta a conectar. Não consigo descobrir o problema dessa antena. Envie sua duvida para @redes_brasil_bot

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

3 Feb 2026, 02:02 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1525, por SDTV Fiz uma configuração de uma Olt Intelbras no Mikrotik, provisiono a onu certinho , crio a bridge , crio o ppoe mais não sobe e não navega ! Alguém pode me ajudar ? Envie sua duvida para @redes_brasil_bot

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

24 Jan 2026, 12:47 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1519, por Felipe Fonseca Seguinte, eu tenho uma RB760IGS que é o DHCP server da rede, e está conectado a um switch CSS106 (rb260), que por sua vez está conectado a um CSS610 via fibra. Porém o CSS610 não obtém DHCP client, a conexão SFP está estabelecida, desabilitei o autonegotation das sfps do CSS610 porque, só funciona em 1GB, porém o DHCP não funciona. Não uso VLAN, as configurações

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

6 Jan 2026, 19:51 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1518, por Rodolfo Batista Boa tarde, pessoal! Tenho um mikrotik RB4011 com várias VLANs criadas. Preciso criar uma regra masquerade para cada vlan criada ou com apenas uma única regra no NAT eu consigo aplicar para todas as vlans? Envie sua duvida para @redes_brasil_bot

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

6 Jan 2026, 19:51 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1517, por Rodolfo Batista Boa tarde, pessoal! Tenho um mikrotik RB4011 com várias VLANs criadas. Preciso criar uma regra masquerade para cada vlan criada ou com apenas uma única regra no NAT eu consigo aplicar para todas as vlans? Envie sua duvida para @redes_brasil_bot

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

20 Aug 2025, 15:33 UTC≈1,970 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1473, por Adriano Leite Alguém poderia me tirar uma dívida?! Sobre planejamento interno de IPV6?! > Para fechar OSPF ipv6 entre roteadores no mesmo POP ou entre POPs, num mesmo provedor, vocês reservam algum prefix /64, ou outro / (barra) do ANS OU bloco RECEBIDO para endereços PTP entre esses roteadores, ou não, usam apenas o link local fe80:... fazendo a conexão pela interface, se aca

3

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

19 Aug 2025, 11:30 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1469, por Livio Santos Fiz uma instalação via rádio,com sxt lite 5 configuração normal,cabo 100mbps,sinal e transmissão ok mais não conecta o pppoe. Já troquei todos aparelhos e não resolve o problema que não conecta o pppoe,o que pode ser? Envie sua duvida para @redes_brasil_bot

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

18 Aug 2025, 16:41 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 16 August 2026

Dúvida confirmada Dúvida Nº 1468, por lfsa .sh Tenho pnetlab em meu proxmox, na rede LAN, acesso sem problemas. Mas gostaria de acessá-la externamente(outros serviços também)! Fazendo nat conseguir, porém muitas opções ficam inacessível por conta n portas que pnetlab criar para cada equipamento virtual, tenho um domínio na cloudflare, ip público fixo e uma container proxmox rodando Nginx reverse proxy, mas estou co

Signed Bot Redes Brasil

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @forum_redes_brasil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Erico Rocha - Galera Raiz
@ericorocha_galeraraiz · 89,988
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
O Primo Rico
@thiagonigro · 104,129
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fórum Redes Brasil” (@forum_redes_brasil), 1,866 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forum_redes_brasil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.