Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Форум Машук

Channel

Форум Машук

@forum_mashuk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,253subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001167287372
TypeChannel
Username@forum_mashuk
Created24 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/forum_mashuk

Growth

9,2539,2779,2656 August 2026 — 9,261 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,261 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,260 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,276 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,277 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,253 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,249–9,281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:139,253-24
12 Aug 2026, 13:059,277+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:349,276+16
6 Aug 2026, 12:409,260-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:179,261no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:069,261first reading

Engagement

98 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.65%
avg views ÷ 9,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
708
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 98 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held98 (20 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total69,367
Reactions total1,695
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25m 02s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,695 reactions across 95 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
86951.3%
❤‍🔥25815.2%
🔥22813.5%
👍1347.91%
🥰563.30%
custom 5317032567415806982462.71%
custom 5316961490002022250392.30%
custom 5316598633984987741271.59%
😭231.36%
👏70.413%
🙏50.295%
custom 531681723064048590530.177%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,695reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 98 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @forum_mashuk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 98 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC233 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9

15 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC415 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Финал сезона сериала «Машук» оказался совсем не таким, как мы ожидали 😢 Карену Витальевичу доверили самое важное — сохранить флешку с проектом. Но одно неожиданное происшествие рушит все планы… Так ли закончится их история? Самое время пересмотреть все серии в нашем плейлисте ВКонтакте и вспомнить, с чего всё начиналось 🎬

7

15 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC442 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Знак машуковца — всё отдали и ни о чем не жалеем 😘 Однажды попав на «Машук», навсегда становишься его частью. Мы в тебя влюбились с первого дня и уже очень скучаем! Сохранили на кадрах всю первую смену — тысячи историй, улыбок и моментов, которые хочется сохранить надолго. Отправляйся на поиски своих ярких кадров!

5

14 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC536 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10🔥7🥰7

14 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC497 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Первая причина — это ты 💔 Мы долго искали ответ, почему эти дни на «Машуке» пролетели так быстро. И кажется, нашли разгадку. Потому что дело не только в событиях, встречах и насыщенной программе. Дело в людях, которые за несколько дней стали частью одной большой истории. На связи снова Вероника Аномалия — и сегодня у неё особенный выпуск. Немного тайн, немного магии «Машука» и много моментов, которые хочется сохран

6❤‍🔥4🔥3

14 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC478 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Зажечь огни форума… 🔥 А теперь задача участников первой смены — зажечь их по своим городам. Своими навыками, идеями и опытом, которые получили на «Машуке». Первую смену закрыли. Ярко, тепло и очень трогательно. Кажется, только вчера мы встречались, знакомились, смеялись, делились историями и постепенно становились друг другу близкими… А сегодня уже пришло время сказать: «До встречи». Мы уже грустим и скучаем по те

11🔥4❤‍🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC469 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Повзрослели. Теперь — объединяемся 🤍 Одна история подходит к концу, а другая уже тихонько начинается. Чемоданы собраны, в глазах слёзы, а внутри — целая жизнь, которую успели прожить вместе. Но не спеши грустить. Завтра у тебя ещё будет время сказать самые тёплые слова, крепко обнять тех, кто за это время стал по-настоящему близким. Забирай своё расписание, чтобы всё успеть. А для тех, кто только начинает свой пут

8🔥5❤‍🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC507 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Мы газуем, когда есть… 🤭 Когда есть наши партнёры:) Давай познакомимся с ними! Начнём с IAMREBEL. Немного «стритовый», но при этом очень стильный. Тот самый бренд, который отвечает за ситуацию: ты просто идёшь в своей красивой футболочке, а через минуту уже слышишь: «Где взять такую же?» 😎 Идеи не стоят на парковке — они стремительно рвутся вперёд. Поэтому из точки А в точку Б нас доставляет каршеринг «Регион 26»

9❤‍🔥6🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC513 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

14 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC516 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🛎️ В 16:30 открывай новые горизонты: тебя ждут мастер-классы, встречи с интересными людьми и обсуждения в четырёх шатрах.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @forum_mashuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 20,985 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Движение Первых
@mypervie · 197,072
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
Владимир Владимиров
@VVV5807 · 147,040
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Форум Машук” (@forum_mashuk), 9,253 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forum_mashuk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.