Меня зовут Мария.
По диплому - химик-технолог.
Бывший научный сотрудник НИИ ФОХ.
Здесь про уход за волосами, трихологию, средства для волос, шампуни, маски, сыворотки 🧴
Обзоры и подборки достойных банок каждую неделю 💇♀️
Менеджер - @DmitryCh85
Created
Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 63 days, net +13,245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,208–52,933 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 03:00
48,712
-981
4 Oct 2026, 17:19
49,693
-733
26 Sept 2026, 19:37
50,426
+7,038
17 Sept 2026, 12:40
43,388
-983
15 Sept 2026, 13:59
44,371
-482
13 Sept 2026, 23:41
44,853
+1,480
12 Sept 2026, 03:39
43,373
+1,796
9 Sept 2026, 17:17
41,577
-193
6 Sept 2026, 08:17
41,770
+3,208
4 Sept 2026, 02:21
38,562
-410
2 Sept 2026, 14:59
38,972
-195
1 Sept 2026, 17:34
39,167
-868
31 Aug 2026, 14:27
40,035
-60
30 Aug 2026, 12:36
40,095
+505
29 Aug 2026, 11:16
39,590
+2,448
28 Aug 2026, 14:04
37,142
-64
27 Aug 2026, 11:44
37,206
-71
26 Aug 2026, 11:23
37,277
+37
25 Aug 2026, 09:12
37,240
-193
24 Aug 2026, 11:06
37,433
first reading
Engagement
125 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 48,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,640
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 125 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held
125 (28 July 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total
259,210
Reactions total
9,780
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
513
Videos
2
Links
418
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
1m 47s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,626 reactions across 125 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,240
47.8%
👍
7,979
31.1%
🔥
4,384
17.1%
😁
169
0.659%
❤🔥
146
0.57%
✍
143
0.558%
😱
128
0.499%
💯
111
0.433%
👏
72
0.281%
🎉
65
0.254%
🥰
61
0.238%
🤝
49
0.191%
🙏
37
0.144%
👌
23
0.09%
🍓
15
0.059%
🐳
3
0.012%
🦄
1
0.004%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 125 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,626 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.60%
2 of 125 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,780
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,870
over 123 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2RanymSnB15
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
2W5zFJq4bzy
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Осветляющая линейка. А всё ли в ней действительно осветляет? 🍋
Возвращаюсь к вашим вопросам из комментариев 💗
Увидела знакомое название - John Frieda Go Blonder - и вспомнила, что мы уже обсуждали осветляющие спреи для волос.
Но здесь задали другой вопрос: насколько безопасны для натуральных волос шампунь и кондиционер из этой линейки?
Давайте заглянем)
Производитель позиционирует линейку как осветляющую, а эффе…
Давайте обсудим ещё один момент: а нужно ли теперь добавлять в уход отдельную баночку специально для поддержки микробиома кожи головы?
На самом деле, совсем не обязательно.
Мы уже говорили о том, что микробиом не существует отдельно от самой кожи. На условия, в которых живут микроорганизмы, влияют состояние кожного барьера, количество и состав себума, очищение и другие факторы.
Поэтому, заботясь о состоянии кожи г…
Оставлю вам небольшую шпаргалку с названиями компонентов, которые можно встретить в составах косметики, позиционируемой в рамках «микробиомной» концепции.
Список, конечно, далеко не полный - просто несколько ориентиров, чтобы было чуть проще разбираться в составе.
Это не чек-лист компонентов, которые обязательно должны быть в уходе 🐱
Можно ради интереса заглянуть в свои баночки - вдруг что-нибудь знакомое уже найд…
Говоря о микробиоме, пора наконец заглянуть на полку с косметикой
Тема микробиома сейчас активно развивается не только в исследованиях, но и в косметической индустрии. И если раньше microbiome-friendly мы чаще встречали в уходе за кожей лица, то сейчас эта концепция всё активнее появляется и в средствах для кожи головы.
Но что вообще скрывается за словами про-, пре- и постбиотики?
🦠Пробиотики -это живые микроорган…
Кажется, моя Omnia постепенно обрастает целым, причём весьма завидным приданым 😅
С самой подушкой мы знакомы уже давно, многие заказали ее по моей рекомендации. На этот раз решила попробовать шелковые аксессуары, знаете мою любовь к нему.
Для тех, кто пропустил наши предыдущие встречи, буквально пару слов о самой подушке Omnia.
Это ортопедическая подушка 3-Д формы с выемками по бокам. Я практически всегда сплю на …
P.S. И кстати, ещё один небольшой практический момент к утреннему посту 🐱
Если после первого нанесения кондиционера вы чувствуете, что волосам как будто бы не хватило, иногда можно попробовать после смывания нанести это же средство ещё раз.
Причём необязательно снова распределять его по всей длине - можно нанести только на участок, которому, по ощущениям, кондиционирования не хватило. Например, на более повреждённые…
Обсудим ещё один вопрос из комментариев 😊
#вопросы_подписчиков
Я здесь немного возьму на себя вольность и переформулирую вопрос так, как я его поняла: насколько тщательно нужно промывать волосы после маски или кондиционера и нормально ли, если после смывания они остаются гладкими и скользкими?
И заодно предлагаю поговорить о том, как вообще понять уже во время мытья, что быстрый поверхностный кондиционирующий уход …
Ну что, друзья, многие угадали!
И отдельно мне понравилась версия из комментариев:
«Какой-то солевой скраб, который хочет ещё и помыть голову» 😄
Собственно, почти так и есть. Перед нами шампунь-скраб.
Причём формат далеко не уникальный: такие средства встречаются у разных брендов и в совершенно разных ценовых категориях - условно от нескольких сотен до нескольких тысяч рублей.
Различается и то, за счёт чего предл…
В рамках форума «Доказательная косметика: будущее за наукой» предусмотрены мастер-классы (запись через форму на сайте):
https://innovativedrugsconference.sechenov.ru/cosmeticsforum
Мастер-класс №1
Косметический инжениринг: интенсив по созданию косметического продукта —практический мастер-класс для тех, кто хочет познакомиться с основами разработки косметических средств. Участники смогут создать уходовый крем, узнать…
Друзья, ну не могу с вами не поделиться 📢
Для тех, кому интересно не только пользоваться косметикой, но и немного заглянуть за кулисы её разработки и исследований - очень любопытная подборка мастер-классов.
Я, если честно, сама бы с огромным удовольствием посетила 😅 Особенно когда это не только теория, а возможность поучаствовать в процессе и увидеть всё немного изнутри.
В общем, будь возможность - точно не прошла…
Небольшая утренняя зарядка 🤯😄
Перед вами состав средства, которое предполагается использовать непосредственно на коже головы для её очищения:
Sea Salt, Panax Ginseng Root Extract, Sargassum Pallidum Extract, Laminaria Japonica Extract, Fucus Vesiculosus Extract, Laminaria Digitata Extract, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Sodium Laureth Sulfate, Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate, Sorbitol, Aqua, Cetrimonium Chloride, Silicone Quate…
Можно ли мыть голову каждый день? 🫧
Предлагаю рассмотреть более практический вопрос: что вообще происходит при частом, в том числе ежедневном, мытье?
И здесь может возникнуть ещё один вопрос: может ли частое мытьё каким-либо образом изменить микробиоту?
И сначала напомню: универсального правильного интервала между мытьём головы не существует.
Кому-то комфортно мыть голову раз в несколько дней, кому-то - через день…
❤75👍49🔥8😁3🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @formulavoloss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Формула волос” (@formulavoloss), 48,712 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/formulavoloss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.