Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TON Formula | News

Channel

TON Formula | News

@formula_ton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

16,026subscribers

-197 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002253005966
TypeChannel
Username@formula_ton
Description🏎️ Welcome to Formula TON — get ready to see all the hottest news, airdrop opportunities, and token updates at full speed! Cooperation: @formula_support
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/formula_ton

Growth

16,02616,22316,124.57 August 2026 — 16,223 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,223 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,221 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,218 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,216 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,206 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,202 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,191 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,187 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,174 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,154 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,132 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,128 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,122 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,118 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,102 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,079 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,066 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,059 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,045 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,039 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,029 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,026 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 23 days, net -197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,996–16,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 17:3416,026-3
29 Aug 2026, 14:0316,029-10
28 Aug 2026, 11:5616,039-6
27 Aug 2026, 09:4516,045-14
26 Aug 2026, 06:1216,059-7
25 Aug 2026, 06:0616,066-13
24 Aug 2026, 02:5416,079-23
22 Aug 2026, 08:4816,102-16
21 Aug 2026, 01:4416,118-4
20 Aug 2026, 03:1316,122-6
18 Aug 2026, 23:5216,128-4
17 Aug 2026, 20:1616,132-22
16 Aug 2026, 18:3516,154-20
15 Aug 2026, 04:3916,174-13
14 Aug 2026, 00:1416,187-4
12 Aug 2026, 16:2716,191-11
11 Aug 2026, 16:5216,202-4
10 Aug 2026, 15:1716,206-10
9 Aug 2026, 18:2316,216-2
8 Aug 2026, 21:1716,218first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
300
Videos
12
Links
70

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

372 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩10628.5%
👍8623.1%
🔥7419.9%
6216.7%
🎉287.53%
👏123.23%
😁30.806%
🥰10.269%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 372reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2025 to 23 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @formula_ton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2025 to 23 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2025, 09:24 UTC≈1,560 views23 reactions1 Starread 31 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Week 17 of Graphite’s Market Staking Program is LIVE Graphite is bridging TradFi ↔ Web3 with real-world security, clean tech, and on-chain rewards. ⚡️ $103,680 in total rewards → $25,920 @G per chain (Arbitrum · Polygon · BSC · Ethereum) How it works: ▪️ Trade $@G on supported DEXs ▪️ Hit $388,800 weekly volume to qualify ▪️ Top 10% of traders split the pot ▪️ Leaderboards reset + payouts every Monday ▪️ DEXs:

🎉154👍2🔥2

15 Jul 2025, 08:09 UTC≈1,510 views24 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🎁 One user accidentally burned 10 million $PUMP tokens (worth ~$75,000) from an airdrop — all because they used a wallet cleanup tool to “delete junk tokens.” 💸 Moral of the story: Always double-check before you take out the trash… it might be gold.

🤩154🔥3👍2

8 Jul 2025, 09:05 UTC≈1,420 views24 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

📣 ZachXBT claims KuCoin is ignoring law enforcement According to the on-chain sleuth, KuCoin has repeatedly failed to respond to official requests and hasn't frozen stolen funds from major hacks — even after being directly alerted. 👉 If true, this could raise serious questions about KuCoin’s compliance and user safety.

🤩145👍3🔥2

3 Jul 2025, 08:26 UTC≈1,260 views23 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🪙 Elon Musk liked a tweet yesterday suggesting he's secretly buying Bitcoin. Is it a hint… or just Elon being Elon? 👀 With Musk, you never really know — but the market always pays attention.

🎉134👍4🔥2

24 Jun 2025, 10:53 UTC≈1,280 views25 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🍣 Japan's Metaplanet is going all in on Bitcoin. The firm is allocating $5B to its U.S. branch with the goal of accumulating 210,000 BTC by the end of 2027. Wall Street has MicroStrategy. Tokyo has Metaplanet.

🤩146👍3🔥2

16 Jun 2025, 08:15 UTC≈1,130 views25 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

💸 Coinbase just dropped a new crypto card — and it comes with 4% cashback in BTC.

🤩14👍63🔥2

9 Jun 2025, 07:57 UTC≈1,170 views22 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

📊 CryptoQuant: The market is officially in “wait mode.” Spot trading volume on exchanges has dropped to its lowest since October 2020. Coins aren’t moving on-chain, selling pressure is low — but so is demand. 👉 Now it’s all up to futures traders to shake things up.

🤩144🔥3👍1

27 May 2025, 10:16 UTC≈1,270 views21 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🇹🇭 Thailand may soon let tourists spend crypto seamlessly via credit card links. Merchants would still receive Thai baht — without even knowing crypto was used. 👉 A quiet leap toward mass adoption is in the works.

🤩12👍42👏2🔥1

23 May 2025, 08:34 UTC≈1,260 views20 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

📊 Fear & Greed Index hits 78 — Extreme Greed levels not seen since January. When the market gets greedy, it's time to be cautious.

🤩11👍52🔥2

20 May 2025, 12:08 UTC≈1,230 views23 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

💲 Circle is reportedly in informal talks about a potential acquisition — with both Coinbase and Ripple. Ripple offered $4–5B (partly in XRP), but Circle declined, valuing itself at a minimum of $5B. 👉 Meanwhile, Circle is also preparing for a public listing, though market volatility could delay the IPO.

🤩12🔥4👍32👏2

17 May 2025, 13:31 UTC≈1,210 views20 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

💸 Wisconsin Investment Board has fully exited its position in BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) in Q1 2025 — selling all 6,060,351 shares worth $355.6M. Interestingly, Wisconsin was one of the first institutional buyers of BTC ETFs, purchasing $164M worth in Q1 2024. 🐳 Meanwhile, Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund Mubadala doubled down — adding 491,439 IBIT shares, now holding 8,726,972 shares valued at $512M.

🔥13👍52

15 May 2025, 07:54 UTC≈1,160 views9 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🪙 The amount of “illiquid” BTC — coins that are rarely moved or sold — has hit a record high, surpassing 14 million. Historically, this is seen as a bullish signal for Bitcoin’s long-term price trajectory. 📈

👍52🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @formula_ton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TON Formula | News” (@formula_ton), 16,026 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/formula_ton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.