£4,200 withdrawal secured 🏆 for an account management client. Message me @Therealforexed if you are interested in being a personal client of mine.

Channel
Forexed
@forexed1
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,051subscribers
-105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001826278759 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @forexed1 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/forexed1 |
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 10,051 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 10,056 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 10,062 | -11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 10,073 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 10,078 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 10,084 | -12 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 10,096 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 10,103 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 10,110 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 10,113 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 10,117 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 10,122 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 10,132 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 10,145 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 10,155 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 10,156 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.90%
- avg views ÷ 10,051 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 794
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (16 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,353 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 49s
- Average length
- 1m 57s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
SIGNAL: BUY GBPJPY ENTRY: 216.033 SL: 215.70 TP: 217.020 RRR: 1 : 3 First trade of the week, let’s go!
USDCAD breakdown
EURAUD breakdown
GBPJPY breakdown
Client invested £2,000 for my account management program , and I was able to secure £6,700 on the account already. Keep note of the date of deposit and trades. 2 new spots are open for my account management program. Message me if you’re interested (@TheRealForexed)
Opportunities come and go. Having a seasoned trader with 10+ years of experience giving you an opportunity for account management that would generate a consistent side income is a rare opportunity.
A client decided to invest the recommended $5,000 earlier during market open, and we have already made two withdrawals 🏆 with the total profit of $8681.00 ! This is just ONE example of a happy client. Account management: @TheRealForexed
GBPJPY:- Price is looking for a big move, we have been pushing higher for the last several weeks, and so I expect this could potentially be the local bottom for GJ as price begins its bullish acceleration. Holding into 218.818, but this could eventually make even newer highs.
SIGNAL: BUY GBPJPY ENTRY: 218.372 SL: 218.195 TP: 218.818 RRR: 1 : 2.5
Another client. Another withdrawal. We made over 1.9k pounds in profit in a short span of time, while adhering to proper risk management and accurate entries. If you’re interested in expanding your source of income and to establish a side income, do not hesitate to reach out for an opportunity of account management with me. @therealforexed
GBPJPY:- Price shot up and floated straight into profit after giving the signal for a total of 2R during London session. However, since then, we have seen price come back down to retest our entry as it still maintains profitability. For those that happened to close in profit, great job - I am still holding. ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @forexed1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 230,872 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Forexed” (@forexed1), 10,051 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forexed1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.