Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Forex city pro

@forexcitypro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,206subscribers

+467 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002431760410
TypeChannel
Username@forexcitypro
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/forexcitypro

Growth

16,73917,20616,972.57 August 2026 — 16,739 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,747 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,763 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,773 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,835 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,115 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,182 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,206 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +467. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,669–17,276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:3817,206+24
12 Aug 2026, 19:5317,182+67
11 Aug 2026, 17:4217,115+280
10 Aug 2026, 19:1316,835+62
9 Aug 2026, 22:1216,773+10
9 Aug 2026, 01:3116,763+16
8 Aug 2026, 02:1816,747+8
7 Aug 2026, 15:1516,739first reading

Engagement

84 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 17,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 84 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held84 (5 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total199,043
Reactions total8,935
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8,935 reactions across 83 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,51650.5%
👍2,63729.5%
😁5566.22%
🔥4464.99%
👎2372.65%
👌1501.68%
😭760.851%
🙏680.761%
😨670.75%
🤔570.638%
😱370.414%
😎260.291%
😈170.19%
💯160.179%
👏110.123%
🤝70.078%
🤯60.067%
😡30.034%
🏆20.022%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,935reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 83 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @forexcitypro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 84 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈1,070 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

تحلیل روزانه فارکس604 | لایو خبر ، ترید روی دلار ، طلا ، شاخص های سهام https://youtu.be/kX7Hs8HT-5w

👍288🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC693 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @newscityproPhoto

🔴داده‌های تورم تولیدکننده آمریکا منتشر شد 🟡‏Core PPI m/m ‏Actual: 0.2% ‏Forecast: 0.3% ‏Previous: 0.2% ‏تورم هسته تولیدکننده کمتر از پیش‌بینی بازار ثبت شده و نسبت به ماه قبل نیز بدون تغییر باقی مانده است. ‏این داده نشان می‌دهد فشارهای تورمی در سطح تولیدکننده شتاب نگرفته و از این جهت تا حدی سیگنال آرام‌تری برای چشم‌انداز تورم محسوب می‌شود. 🟡‏PPI m/m ‏Actual: 0.0% ‏Forecast: 0.2% ‏Previous: -0.3% ‏شاخص کلی ق

👍2810

13 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,280 views77 reactionsread 13 August 2026

تحلیل امروز همزمان با خبر ppi ( تورم تولید کننده آمریکا ) رکورد میکنم براتون هم تحلیل رو ببینیم و هم واکنش لحظه ای بازار به خبر و یک نتیجه گیری برای بعد از خبر

54👍20😎3

13 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,850 views75 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔥شاخص دلار برگشت بالای 100 و همین باعث فشار فروش روی طلا و نقره شد 🔥بازار داخلی هم که تعطیله، پس عددها همون پایانی سه‌شنبه‌ست. 🔥دلار ایران هم به حالت رنج در اومده بین ناحیه 185 تا 190 در حال نوسانه

53👍19🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC≈2,070 views142 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🔥آدم‌های عمل‌گرا منتظر تضمین نیستند. آن‌ها ریسک را می‌سنجند، تصمیم می‌گیرند و بعد با نتیجه تصمیمشان روبه‌رو می‌شوند. 🔥زندگی بدون ریسک وجود ندارد؛ 🔥اما می‌توان ریسک را مدیریت کرد. روزتون بخیر 💚💚💚

115👍23👌3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC≈2,480 views79 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#EURUSD #1h شکست کف رنج و حمایت داینامیک همزمان اگر تثبیت بده توی پولبک ها یا کندل شکست مناسب برای پوزیشن سل

62👍15🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈2,510 views83 reactionsread 13 August 2026

این لایو رو اگر ندیدید سیو شده هروقت خواستید میتونید ببینید نکات مهمی گفته شد

79👎2🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,610 views76 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @newscityproPhoto

🔴 تمام داده‌های تورمی طبق انتظار بازار منتشر شدند. 🔥 @newscitypro

62👍10🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈3,170 views65 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://youtube.com/live/Hi9lytFFaVI?feature=share لایو شروع شد 💚❤️

47👍13🔥5

12 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈2,600 views83 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Voice message

خلاصه نگاه بازار به خبر امروز

👍5421🔥4👌2😈1😎1

12 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈2,650 views97 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

پیش بینی موسسات مالی بزرگ از تورم امروز رو ببینید

👍7316😈6🔥1🤔1

12 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈2,530 views66 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

تحلیل روزانه فارکس603 | آماده شیم برای حرکت بزرگ بازار، طلا ادامه میده https://youtu.be/oPklZrkF02s تحلیل کوتاه و خلاصه داشته باشید ✔️ اصل موضوع در لایو هست 🔥

52👍10🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @forexcitypro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 254,990 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Forex city pro” (@forexcitypro), 17,206 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forexcitypro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.