Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 65 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,138–13,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 15:15
13,258
+46
7 Oct 2026, 05:20
13,212
+17
2 Oct 2026, 10:35
13,195
+41
18 Sept 2026, 16:58
13,154
-20
16 Sept 2026, 08:36
13,174
-14
14 Sept 2026, 17:18
13,188
-10
13 Sept 2026, 03:57
13,198
-19
11 Sept 2026, 04:01
13,217
-4
8 Sept 2026, 09:17
13,221
+3
5 Sept 2026, 03:00
13,218
-20
3 Sept 2026, 09:19
13,238
-1
1 Sept 2026, 23:46
13,239
-6
31 Aug 2026, 20:34
13,245
+2
30 Aug 2026, 18:13
13,243
-4
29 Aug 2026, 16:55
13,247
+7
28 Aug 2026, 17:18
13,240
+32
27 Aug 2026, 20:44
13,208
-5
26 Aug 2026, 19:54
13,213
-4
25 Aug 2026, 19:14
13,217
-1
24 Aug 2026, 19:45
13,218
first reading
Engagement
128 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 128 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,098 reactions across 127 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,261
53.5%
👍
1,312
21.5%
🤣
760
12.5%
🔥
309
5.07%
❤🔥
244
4.00%
👎
124
2.03%
🤯
71
1.16%
😈
17
0.279%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,098 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
64
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 127 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eventum_space. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 128 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 اما ما چرا تمام این مدت روی این موضوع تاکید داشتیم که کنار ترید یک شغل دیگه هم داشته باشید
همه اینا شاید توی یک جمله خلاصه بشه
🔥 داشتن باریکه درامدی درکنار ترید
از شما تریدر بهتری میسازه
چون ذهن شما دیگه دغدغه یکسری نیاز های اولیه رو نداره و از همین بابت بهتر و فوکس تر تصمیم میگیره
🔥 اما این تنها موضوع مهم نیست
جزئیات زیادی هست که باید بدونیم
پرپل فیوژن جواب همین مسئله هستش
جمعه منتظرتون هستیم.
🔥🔥🔥🔥
🔥چرخههای اقتصادی: چرا بازار همیشه یهجور نیست
🔥 اقتصاد بین چهار فاز اصلی حرکت میکنه: رونق، اوج، رکود، و کف. توی فاز رونق، رشد اقتصادی و اعتماد بالاست و پول راحتتر وارد بازارهای پرریسک میشه. توی اوج، رشد به سقف خودش میرسه و نشونههای احتیاط شروع میشه. توی رکود، رشد کند یا منفی میشه و سرمایه به سمت داراییهای امن فرار میکنه. و توی کف، بدترین شرایط پشت سر گذاشته شده و زمینه برای رونق بعدی آماده میشه.
🔥 نکته مهم اینه…
🔥 چرا یه تصمیم بانک مرکزی، کل بازار رو تکون میده
🔥 وقتی بانک مرکزی نرخ بهره رو تغییر میده، در واقع داره قیمت پول رو عوض میکنه. نرخ بهره بالاتر یعنی قرض گرفتن گرونتر میشه؛ نتیجهش اینه که سرمایه از داراییهای پرریسک مثل سهام و کریپتو خارج میشه و سمت گزینههای امنتر مثل اوراق قرضه میره، چون حالا میشه بدون ریسک هم سود معقولی گرفت.
🔥 برعکسش هم صادقه: وقتی نرخ بهره پایین میاد، پول ارزونتر میشه، نقدینگی بیشتری وارد با…
🔥 فکر کن الان یه سال دیگهست. همچنان فقط یه تریدری، یا یه چیز بیشتر از اون ساختی؟
🔥 خیلی از تریدرهایی که میشناسیم، بهترین سرمایهشون رو نه توی حساب معاملاتی، بلکه توی یه مسیر موازی ساختن؛ مسیری که از همون دانش بازار و پولی که از ترید درآوردن شروع شده، ولی الان دیگه به خود ترید وابسته نیست.
🔥 Purple Fusion دقیقا درباره همینه. بهزودی بیشتر براتون میگیم.
🔥🔥🔥🔥
🔥 لنگر تخفیف، چرا فکر میکنی داری صرفهجویی میکنی
🔥 فروشندهها از همون هیوریستیک لنگرسازی که قبلا دربارش گفتیم، دقیقا برای فروش بیشتر استفاده میکنن. وقتی یه قیمت اصلی خطخورده کنار یه قیمت تخفیفدار میبینی، ذهنت اون قیمت اول رو بهعنوان ارزش واقعی کالا ثبت میکنه؛ حالا هر عددی کمتر از اون، حس «سود» میده، حتی اگه اون قیمت اولیه هیچوقت واقعی نبوده و صرفا برای همین لنگرسازی تعیین شده باشه.
🔥 نتیجهش اینه که آدم چیزی …
🔥 لنگر حساب دیگران: چرا اسکرینشات موفقیت یکی دیگه، معیار تو نیست
🔥 وقتی یه اسکرینشات از سود بزرگ یکی دیگه میبینی، ناخودآگاه اون عدد میشه معیار جدیدت؛ حتی اگه سرمایه، ریسکپذیری، و شرایط اون آدم هیچ ربطی به تو نداشته باشه. حالا حساب خودت، هرچقدم خوب پیش رفته باشه، در مقایسه با اون یه نفر، ناکافی به نظر میرسه.
🔥 مشکل اینه که اون اسکرینشات فقط یه لحظهست، نه کل داستان؛ نه ضررهای قبلیش رو نشون میده، نه سرمایه واقعیش…
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @eventum_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EVENTUM” (@eventum_space), 13,258 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eventum_space.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.