Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for юра ничего личного

Channel

юра ничего личного

@foreverinurchains

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,945subscribers

+842 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003936024051
TypeChannel
Username@foreverinurchains
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/foreverinurchains

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1031,9451,52411 August 2026 — 1,103 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,107 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,198 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,246 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,279 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,295 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,330 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,393 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,645 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,794 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,945 subscribers11 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +842. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 977–2,071 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:571,945+151
15 Sept 2026, 06:571,794+149
11 Sept 2026, 16:191,645+252
7 Sept 2026, 11:581,393+63
2 Sept 2026, 08:261,330+35
30 Aug 2026, 00:241,295+16
27 Aug 2026, 08:541,279+33
24 Aug 2026, 09:581,246+48
21 Aug 2026, 02:431,198+20
17 Aug 2026, 18:291,178+9
15 Aug 2026, 00:551,169+62
11 Aug 2026, 14:331,107+4
11 Aug 2026, 00:461,103first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

617 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤38061.6%
💔23738.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @foreverinurchains. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC493 views70 reactionsread 11 August 2026

сегодня загнался сильнее обычного, меня спросили: «как там на личном?»

❤47💔23

10 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC489 views39 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

жаль, что алгоритмы тиктока не пропускали моё старое творчество в рекомендации, но и многие хуй клали на такое кол-во текста!)

❤32💔7

10 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC564 views89 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

я бы это репостнул

❤69💔20

10 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC512 views26 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

ну чё ты ломаешься-то, а? перестань из мухи слона раздувать, просто потерпи и полежи ради меня немного… я ж вижу, как ты напряглась, но вместо того чтобы остановиться, мне проще сделать вид, будто ты просто «набиваешь себе цену». я нарочно называю твоё чёткое «нет» обычным капризом, чтобы ты сама усомнилась в своей правоте и подумала, что это с тобой что-то не так. я заворачиваю свой эгоизм в красивую обёртку, навеши…

❤18💔8

10 Aug 2026, 02:57 UTC477 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! (можно выкладывать) юр,привет,хочу поделиться своей историей ,с парнем в отношениях пол года,он относится ко мне хорошо,но узнала про измену ,сказала ему об этом,спросила почему и как,он слезно умолял меня не уходить,дал доступ ко всему,на днях буквально он обсуждал со своим другом других девочек,пример этих сообщений был такой «вот эта красивая,интересно целка она или нет» буквал…

❤4💔3

10 Aug 2026, 02:25 UTC508 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Привет всем кто читает, хочу услышать мнение народа на тему того как мне быть. Я уже как год и пару месяцев в отношениях (первые) но в последнее время у меня стали возникать мысли о том что бы уйти. Не потому что мы ссоримся, изменяем или что либо такое, а потому что у обоих взьебано ментальное состояние( у неё больше). Так вот чувствую как будто бы да, я люблю человека но в то же…

❤4💔2

10 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC504 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! (можешь опубликовать, будет интересно мнение других людей узнать) юра, как ты вообще относишься к симпатии на расстоянии? хотя даже не совсем так. мне нравится (вроде, если это можно так назвать в интернет общении) одна девушка из чата, я продолжительное время за ней наблюдаю, но не могу понять, стоит ли вообще начинать с ней общение. меня к ней прям тянет, но в то же время хз, на…

❤7💔2

9 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC612 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤30💔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @foreverinurchains. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“юра ничего личного” (@foreverinurchains), 1,945 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foreverinurchains.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.