Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for forcebook’s ss ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა

Channel

forcebook’s ss ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა

@forcebookss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,472subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001890700106
TypeChannel
Username@forcebookss
Created25 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/forcebookss

Growth

1,4491,4721,460.57 August 2026 — 1,454 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,454 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,452 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,449 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,472 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,446–1,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:051,472+23
11 Aug 2026, 06:411,449-3
8 Aug 2026, 16:071,452-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:011,454no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:171,454first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 1,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
173
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held6 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,039
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC127 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

₊˚꒰꒰ ୧ 🤍🩷﹐ıl﹑schedule update всем приветик! у нас обновление в расписании — одиннадцатого сентября у семьи форсбутомафокс пройдет фансайн в японии! ну как же мне нравится, что форсбу теперь могут брать с собой за границу и нашего любимого томафоксика 🥰🥰

6 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC163 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

₊˚꒰꒰ ୧ 💙⭐️﹐ıl﹑3 friends invite you to eat завтра нас ждет долгожданный второй выпуск совместного шоу каси, джэн и джу — гмм поделились постером к новому эпизоду! 🩵гостями выпуска стали цзинцзин, марк и прем! <3

6 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC176 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

₊˚꒰꒰ ୧ ✨🐚﹐ıl﹑wwd thailand x book более очаровательного видео и более трогательной подписи вы в своей жизни больше не увидите [осталось только дождаться интервью] — журнал wwd thailand поделился с нами видео с буком и его мамой с их совместной фотосессии🤍 «за нежной улыбкой бука касидета стоит семья, которая всегда была для него главной опорой и тем самым безопасным местом, где он мог расти, оставаясь собой. вместе

5 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC192 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

₊˚꒰꒰ ୧ ✨🐚﹐ıl﹑wwd thailand x book мубэн [визажист, который обычно работает с форсбу] поделился сегодня у себя в инстаграме моментами со съемок фотосессии для wwd thailand все не могу перестать пересматривать четвертое видео — какое же каси солнышко 😶 [+1 видео в комм.]

5 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC193 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

₊˚꒰꒰ ୧ ✨🐚﹐ıl﹑wwd thailand x book журнал wwd thailand поделились с нами фото с наимилейшим дуо — мы так редко видим маму каси, и так здорово, что в честь дня матери получилось устроить такую замечательную фотосессию [+1 фото в комм.]🤍🤍

4 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

₊˚꒰꒰ ୧ ⭐🩹﹐ıl﹑plutoyesterday “cotton candy” collection . 🩷 тем временем бук продолжает знакомить нас с новой коллекцией своего бренда — как же я обожаю plutoyesterday: каждая коллекция — это всегда какой-то взрыв творчества, в котором чувствуются бесконечная эстетика и тонкое чувство стиля мне нравится то, с какой серьезностью бук подходит к своему небольшому бизнесу, и как вместе со своей командой он всегда старае

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @forcebookss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 571,158 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“forcebook’s ss ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა” (@forcebookss), 1,472 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forcebookss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.