Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for forbidden garden (❀´ ˘ `❀)

Channel

forbidden garden (❀´ ˘ `❀)

@forbiddengardenbiel

Has discussion group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,496subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001819798502
TypeChannel
Username@forbiddengardenbiel
DescriptionДобро пожаловать в blland 🫶 Чтоб попасть в чат пишите в личные сообщения канала 🌿
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 October 2026
Last confirmed live1 October 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/forbiddengardenbiel

Growth

1,4961 Oct 2026, 01:47 — 1,496 subscribers1 Oct 2026, 02:22 — 1,496 subscribers1 Oct 2026, 02:22 — 1,496 subscribers1 Oct 2026, 01:471 Oct 2026, 02:22
3 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,495–1,497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 02:221,496no change
1 Oct 2026, 02:221,496no change
1 Oct 2026, 01:471,496first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5946.1%
🥰2217.2%
custom 59111630256283356831511.7%
❤‍🔥1511.7%
🔥118.59%
custom 591129972584743296064.69%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 20:16 UTC≈3,050 views43 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

#cutestaff 🤩 У кого ещё Эйден новый китайский краш?

❤30❤‍🔥9custom 59111630256283356834

12 Jun 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,790 views40 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

#cutestaff Милый и скромный Макс ☺️

❤25custom 59111630256283356839❤‍🔥4🥰2

12 Jun 2026, 11:25 UTC≈2,430 views45 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

#cutestaff МаксНаты очень комфортные и уютные как всегда😍❤️ от фото прямо веет весной и нежностью

🥰20🔥11custom 59112997258474329606❤4❤‍🔥2custom 59111630256283356832

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @forbiddengardenbiel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яркие звёзды в голубой комнате 🌌
@bl_boyfriend · 29,888
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 1 October 2026
BLove house 💥 Лакорны и Дорамы
@BLove_house · 19,244
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“forbidden garden (❀´ ˘ `❀)” (@forbiddengardenbiel), 1,496 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forbiddengardenbiel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.