Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 52 days, net -76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,352–8,467 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 15:08
8,367
+2
3 Nov 2026, 15:38
8,365
-4
31 Oct 2026, 05:49
8,369
-7
28 Oct 2026, 07:17
8,376
-15
24 Oct 2026, 23:25
8,391
-8
21 Oct 2026, 13:44
8,399
-43
14 Oct 2026, 20:27
8,442
-7
11 Oct 2026, 12:16
8,449
-5
5 Oct 2026, 00:58
8,454
+11
25 Sept 2026, 15:58
8,443
+2
17 Sept 2026, 12:16
8,441
-2
15 Sept 2026, 13:22
8,443
no change
15 Sept 2026, 12:47
8,443
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 29 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 8,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held
23 (29 March 2025 – 21 October 2026)
Views total
6,130
Reactions total
110
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 00:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
276
Videos
1
Links
319
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
556 reactions across 23 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
223
40.1%
❤
169
30.4%
🔥
75
13.5%
👏
31
5.58%
❤🔥
20
3.60%
😢
19
3.42%
💯
6
1.08%
🙏
4
0.719%
🤩
2
0.36%
👌
1
0.18%
😍
1
0.18%
😨
1
0.18%
🤔
1
0.18%
🥰
1
0.18%
🥱
1
0.18%
🥴
1
0.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 556 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2025 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Дмитрий Глуховский - "Регистрация"
В нашем с вами маленьком клубе по интересам мы уже слушали трилогию романов Дмитрия Глуховского "Метро". Сегодня у нас новый, очень быстро разнесшийся по устам публики, роман Дмитрия Глуховского - Регистрация
Сюжет: женщина средних лет по имени Ульяна узнает, что ее парень по имени Саша пропал на войне в чужой стране, куда его всячески наставляла пойти родная мать, которая никак н…
Страшная история на ночь 😱
"Богатое воображение" - Роберт Блох
Муж обнаруживает, что жена изменяет ему с разнорабочим по имени Джордж. Однажды он приглашает Джорджа выполнить для него посильную работу...
👉Другие книги и рассказы в МЕНЮ
💡Предложить произведение в репертуар
🤑 Помочь в развитии канала
Истории из мира литературы:
Однажды на стол одного издателя лег странный роман, название которого можно перевести как "Невидимые монстры" (Invisible Monsters), написанный писателем-любителем Чаком Палаником.
Издатель прочитал роман и, вызвав к себе начинающего автора сказал ему в глаза, что ничего более гадкого, ничего более тошнотворного, ничего более абсурдного и античеловеческого он не читал уже очень и очень д…
"Мёртвые говорят, если ты умеешь слушать."
(С) Джо Хилл
Лично я открыл для себя творчество Джо Хилла прослушав детективный мистический трилер "Страна Рождества", поэтому и не устаю делиться творчеством этого автора у нас в Канале
С сегодняшнего дня у нас на Канале доступны все 8 книг о Ведьмаке, просто выберете одну из них и наслаждайтесь:
"Последнее желание" (1993)
"Меч предназначения" (1992)
"Кровь эльфов" (1994)
"Час презрения" (1995)
"Крещение огнём" (1996)
"Башня Ласточки" (1997)
"Владычица Озера" (1999)
"Сезон гроз" (2013)
👉Другие книги и рассказы в МЕНЮ
💡Предложить произведение в репертуар
🤑 Помочь в развитии канала
ЦИКЛ РОМАНОВ О ВЕДЬМАКЕ
КНИГА ВОСЬМАЯ
"Сезон гроз" (2013)— восьмая и последняя книга в цикле о ведьмаке, но это не продолжение саги, а приквел, действие которого происходит между рассказами "Последнего желания". Геральт из Ривии, уже известный как Белый Волк, оказывается втянутым в новую череду событий, когда у него крадут его ведьмачьи мечи. Чтобы вернуть их, он отправляется в Керак, прибрежное королевство, где ст…
❤7👍3❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @for_all_twitter_VPD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что побудило главного героя "На Западном фронте без перемен" Пауля Боймера пойти на фронт добровольцем?
Смерь отца на войне7%
Обращение Кайзера к нации18%
Проникновенная речь преподавателя53%
Газетная статья9%
Обстрел его родного города6%
Финансовое положение7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2025 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sirvan Khosravi @sirvankhosravi · 58,171 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аудиокниги ✈️” (@for_all_twitter_VPD), 8,367 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/for_all_twitter_VPD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.