Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اینستا دوره

Channel

اینستا دوره

@footballnab23

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

36,656subscribers

+4,690 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001720105694
TypeChannel
Username@footballnab23
Descriptionمنبع اصلی پابلیک دوره های اینستاگرامی 🌹 لیست دوره های غیر رایگان چنل @inesta_dore_vip تبلیغات با بالاترین کیفیت @tablighatinestadore
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/footballnab23

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

30,08138,79934,44036,6567 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net +4,690. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,773–40,107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 10:4736,656-223
8 Nov 2026, 00:5436,879-181
6 Nov 2026, 20:4637,060-152
5 Nov 2026, 17:1037,212-156
4 Nov 2026, 17:5137,368-235
3 Nov 2026, 17:2937,603-265
2 Nov 2026, 14:5637,868-352
1 Nov 2026, 16:3738,220-579
31 Oct 2026, 20:1038,799+4,239
30 Oct 2026, 18:2734,560-105
29 Oct 2026, 20:5534,665-139
28 Oct 2026, 22:3034,804-194
27 Oct 2026, 17:5534,998-143
26 Oct 2026, 18:5935,141-169
25 Oct 2026, 20:2635,310-147
24 Oct 2026, 22:4635,457-194
24 Oct 2026, 00:2035,651-212
23 Oct 2026, 03:1935,863-360
21 Oct 2026, 23:5936,223+565
20 Oct 2026, 17:4635,658first reading

Engagement

247 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 167 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.53%
avg views ÷ 36,656 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 247 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held247 (8 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total141,086
Reactions total5,365
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
476
Videos
11
Links
263

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12m 54s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

30,794 reactions across 243 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15,89451.6%
👍5,34017.3%
❤‍🔥3,32710.8%
🔥2,6888.73%
🙏9002.92%
⚡8052.61%
🏆6552.13%
🎉2690.874%
💯2660.864%
🤩1870.607%
👎1750.568%
😘1450.471%
🗿1430.464%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 243 of the 247 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,794 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 247 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 87 posts held from the last 30 days (12.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 15:32 UTC475 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026

🎬 ثبت‌نام FUTURE CUT شروع شد! بالاخره رسیدیم به ساعت ۷ 😁❤️ فیوچر کات، آموزش تدوین و تولید محتوا با هوش مصنوعی توی این آموزش سه مهارت اصلی رو یاد می‌گیری: 🎞 تدوین ویدیوی خام تا خروجی نهایی 🎨 ساخت موشن‌گرافیک با کمک هوش مصنوعی 📱 تولید و تدوین ریلز و ویدیوهای کوتاه 🔥 شرایط ویژه اینستادوره 🥇 پله اول ۵۴۳,۰۰۰ تومان فقط ۱۰ ثبت‌نام اول 🥈 پله دوم ۶۵۴,۰۰۰ تومان ۱۰ ثبت‌نام بعدی ⏳ ثبت‌نام فقط تا ساعت ۲۱

❤2

9 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC850 views13 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

آموزش خرید از ربات اینستادوره❤️‍🔥 💎تحویل سریع و آنی @INESTADOREvip_bot

❤13

9 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC521 views7 reactionsread 9 November 2026

برای ۵ نفر اولی که ثبت نام کنن : 🎁دوره ادیت با AI از رومئو دیزاین ‼️فقط و فقط برای ۵ نفر‌ اول

❤3👍3❤‍🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 14:11 UTC512 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026

کمتر از ۲ ساعت تا شروع ثبت نام مونده ‼️ میخوام از هدیه ویژه این دوره هم رو نمایی کنم🫰

👍3❤2❤‍🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 10:07 UTC674 views10 reactionsread 9 November 2026

به نظرم وقتی قراره برای هوش مصنوعی پول خرج کنی، بهتره قبلش بلد باشی چطور ازش درست استفاده کنی. اشتراک یه ابزار ممکنه بعد از یک ماه تموم بشه؛ اما مهارتی که یاد می‌گیری می‌تونه برای پروژه‌های بعدیت هم به کارت بیاد. این دقیقاً چیزیه که می‌خوایم با فیوچر کات یاد بگیریم. ❤️ 🎬 ثبت‌نام امشب از ساعت ۱۹ تا ۲۱ 🥇 ۱۰ نفر اول: ۵۴۳ هزار تومن 🥈 ۱۰ نفر بعدی: ۶۵۴ هزار تومن

❤6👍3❤‍🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC647 views7 reactionsread 9 November 2026

یاد می‌گیری چطور یه فرایند مشخص برای تولید محتوا داشته باشی؛ بدونی هر مرحله رو با چه ابزاری انجام بدی، چه دستوری بنویسی و چطور به خروجی موردنظرت برسی. حتی پرامپت‌های آماده و روش تهیه اشتراک‌های موردنیاز هم جزو موارد معرفی‌شده دوره‌ست. حالا یعنی همه‌چیز رایگانه؟ نه، چنین قولی نمی‌دم. بعضی ابزارها نسخه رایگان یا امکانات محدود دارن و برای استفاده حرفه‌ای‌تر ممکنه به اشتراک پولی نیاز پیدا کنی.💎 اما قرار هم نیست از هم…

❤4❤‍🔥2👍1

9 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC568 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026

فرض کن اشتراک یه هوش مصنوعی رو خریدی. چند روز اول باهاش کار می‌کنی، کلی دستور مختلف امتحان می‌کنی، خروجی خراب می‌گیری، دوباره اصلاحش می‌کنی و آخرش هم شاید به نتیجه‌ای که می‌خواستی نرسی. ⚠️ حالا فکر کن سه چهار تا اشتراک مختلف هم خریده باشی! اینجاست که هزینه اصلی فقط پول اشتراک نیست؛ زمان و اعتباریه که صرف آزمون‌وخطا می‌کنی. تفاوت فیوچر کات همین‌جاست. قرار نیست صرفاً چند تا ابزار بهت معرفی کنه و بگه برو اشتراکشون …

❤3👍1

9 Nov 2026, 10:05 UTC544 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026

یه نگرانی مهمی که خیلی‌هاتون درباره فیوچر کات داشتین، هزینه اشتراک هوش مصنوعیه. «خب دوره رو بخریم، بعدش باید کلی هم پول اشتراک ابزارهای مختلف بدیم؟» 😐 ببین، نگرانی کاملاً منطقیه. مخصوصاً الان که قیمت اشتراک‌های دلاری اصلاً شوخی‌بردار نیست. ‼️ولی یه نکته هست که خیلی‌ها بهش توجه نمی‌کنن. ✔️مشکل فقط پولی بودن ابزارها نیست؛ مشکل اینه که ندونی برای چه کاری، کدوم ابزار رو واقعاً لازم داری.

❤‍🔥4

9 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC655 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026

حالا که می‌دونی توی فیوچر کات چه چیزهایی آموزش داده می‌شه، احتمالاً با نگاه متفاوتی می‌بینیش. پشت یه ویدیوی خوب فقط چند تا افکت قشنگ نیست. ✔️انتخاب بخش‌های مهم، ترتیب کات‌ها، ریتم تصویر، متن‌هایی که روی ویدیو ظاهر می‌شن، صداگذاری و حتی انتخاب تصاویر مکمل، همه روی خروجی اثر دارن. توی این دوره یاد می‌گیری چطور بخشی از همین فرایند رو با کمک هوش مصنوعی انجام بدی. نکته جذاب برای من اینه که به‌جای انجام دستی همه مراحل،…

❤4🎉2

Showing the 12 most recent of 247 posts we hold for @footballnab23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@footballnab23 edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @footballnab23 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
1 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTCAnonymous Poll125 voters

تدوین یه ویدیوی ۶۰ ثانیه‌ای با این سبک و کیفیت چقدر وقتتو می‌گیره؟

  1. کمتر از ۱ ساعت22%
  2. ۲ تا ۳ ساعت31%
  3. نصف روز18%
  4. یه روز کامل23%
  5. اصلاً خودم ادیت نمی‌کنم22%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTCAnonymous Poll84 voters

گزینه مورد نظرتون انتخاب کنین⭐️

  1. شماره 140%
  2. شماره 215%
  3. شماره 314%
  4. شماره 419%
  5. شماره 527%
  6. شماره 625%
  7. شماره 736%
  8. شماره 823%
  9. شماره 925%
  10. شماره 1035%

The shares total 259%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTCAnonymous Poll410 voters

دلیل اینکه تا الان پیجت نداشتین چی بود؟🏆

  1. بلد نبودم و آموزشی خوبی نبود📲37%
  2. وقت و زمانش نداشتم⏰18%
  3. نمیدونستم باید از کجا شروع کنم✅53%
  4. ایده محصول نداشتم🫠28%
  5. کلن نمیخواستم❌11%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTCAnonymous Poll340 voters

رفقا پیج اینستاگرام کاری دارید؟‼️

  1. آره خیلی هم خوبه🫰🏼🔥36%
  2. نه ندارم🥲64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 247 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اینستا دوره” (@footballnab23), 36,656 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/footballnab23.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.