Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Футбольная посещаемость

Channel

Футбольная посещаемость

@football_attendance

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

4,668subscribers

+95 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319027296
TypeChannel
Username@football_attendance
Created20 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/football_attendance

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,5724,6684,6206 August 2026 — 4,573 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,573 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,572 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,576 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,574 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,588 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,608 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,616 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,651 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,644 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,641 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,648 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,646 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,656 subscribers25 September 2026 — 4,668 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 51 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,558–4,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 22:204,668+12
17 Sept 2026, 09:184,656+10
13 Sept 2026, 14:004,646-2
9 Sept 2026, 12:424,648+7
3 Sept 2026, 20:214,641-3
31 Aug 2026, 02:274,644-7
28 Aug 2026, 02:524,651+35
25 Aug 2026, 00:254,616+8
21 Aug 2026, 08:044,608+20
18 Aug 2026, 10:434,588+14
15 Aug 2026, 17:234,574-2
12 Aug 2026, 06:424,576+4
9 Aug 2026, 05:104,572-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:454,573no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:384,573first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,161 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍52845.5%
❤30426.2%
🔥14312.3%
👏1109.47%
👌574.91%
👎100.861%
☃90.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC120 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌳 «Иркутск» — официально второй участник Небесной лиги в этом сезоне Второй Лиги Б. Как одна из самых посещаемых команд дивизиона снова оставила город без профессионального футбола 22 июля «Иркутск» официально сообщил: из‑за нехватки финансирования клуб прекращает участие во Второй лиге Б. В заявлении гендиректора Романа Городничева — благодарность болельщикам, РФС и ФНЛ и надежда, что профессиональный футбол в обла…

❤7👌2

Signed Stanislav Chudin

11 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC733 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Посещаемость Второй лиги Б-2026 на неделе 3 - 9 августа На 29 матчах прошедшей недели средняя посещаемость — 572 зр./матч: на 5% ниже сезонных 602 и на 11% ниже прошлой недели (642). Лидер недели вновь «КДВ»: 2622 болельщика на матче с «Крыльями Советов-2», лучшая цифра выходных. Это обычный томский уровень сезона (домашняя средняя ~2385), и эквивалентно значению прошлой недели (2610) против «Оренбург-2». Выше д…

👍19🔥9👏4❤3👌3

Signed Stanislav Chudin

11 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC826 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍6👌5☃4👎1

Signed TruthfulWandererOrange

10 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,460 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Посещаемость 3-го тура стала рекордной в РПЛ-2026/27. В среднем на каждом матче было почти 16.5 тысяч зрителей Средняя посещаемость тура составила 16498 зр./матч (131986 всего) — на 47% выше 2-го тура (11228) и на 29% выше 1-го (12779). После трёх туров средняя сезона — 13502: на 1% ниже итоговой средней прошлого сезона (13628) и на 5% ниже состояния после 3-го тура-2025/26 (14264). Тур получился преимущественно…

❤34👍20🔥16👏4👌1👎1

Signed Stanislav Chudin

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,130 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1️⃣ Посещаемость 5-го тура Первой лиги: почти 16 тысяч в Волгограде и лучший тур сезона Средняя посещаемость тура — 5894 зр./матч: на 68% выше 4-го тура (3508) и на 35% выше текущей средней сезона (4365). Это лучшее значение лиши почти за год — с 9-го тура сезона-25/26 (6370). В сравнении с состоянием после 5-го тура прошлого сезона (4582) нынешний идёт с отставанием на 5%. В календарь вернулись домашние «Ротор» и …

🔥28👍21👏8❤6👌2

Signed Stanislav Chudin

10 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,100 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Посещаемость 4-го тура Второй лиги А-2026/27: лучший тур сезона, среднюю аудиторию вновь вытягивает Брянск Средняя посещаемость тура — 1337 зр./матч: на 30% выше 3-го тура (1027) и на 12% выше текущей средней сезона (1196). Тур снова вытянул Брянск: 4204 на матче местного «Динамо» и «Сибири» — это 39% всей аудитории выходных и второе значение сезона после брянских же 4450 во 2-м туре. Вместе с Астраханью (1949) …

❤16👍14👏7🔥4👌2

Signed Stanislav Chudin

7 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,860 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Посещаемость 1-го тура группового этапа Пути РПЛ Кубка России • В среднем каждую встречу первого тура посетили 13867 человек (110940 всего) — это на 5% больше, чем было в стартовых турах Пути РПЛ в сезонах-2025/26 (13262) и 2024/25 (13218), но на 4% ниже старта 2023/24 (14404). • Более четверти аудитории тура (27%) собрал один матч в Петербурге: «Зенит» — «Балтика» (30277). В целом, в туре три встречи выше 20 тыс…

👍40❤14🔥10👏3👌1

Signed Stanislav Chudin

6 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,710 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1️⃣ Посещаемость низших европейских лиг-2025/26: Первая лига на уровне испанского третьего эшелона Среди низших дивизионов Европы (уровни 2–4) с посещаемостью выше 1,5 тысячи зрителей на матч Первая лига с 4049 зр./матч занимает 12-е место. На инфографике — 15 лиг, прошедших этот порог: мы сразу после испанской Primera Federación (4089*) и чуть выше французской Ligue 3 (3719). Главный вывод сравнения — не «слабость…

👍54👏20❤11🔥7👌1

Signed Stanislav Chudin

5 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,650 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇾 Посещаемость Высшей лиги Беларуси в июле 2026 г. • В июле в среднем на матч приходило 2244 зрителя — на 8% ниже сезонного значения (2452) и на 17% ниже июня (2705). После двух сильных тёплых месяцев (май — 2853, июнь — 2705) июль был заметно «спокойнее». • Матчей меньше обычного (14), поэтому некоторые встречи попали как в топ «лучших», так и в топ «худших»: часть игр 15-го и 16-го туров перенесена из-за участия…

👍22👏8❤4👌4🔥2

Signed Stanislav Chudin

4 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,790 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Посещаемость Второй лиги Б-2026 на неделе 27 июля - 2 августа На 24 матчах средняя посещаемость — 642 зр./матч: на 6% выше сезонных 604 и на 59% больше прошлой недели (405). Лидер недели — «КДВ»: 2610 болельщиков на матче с «Оренбург-2», лучшая цифра выходных. Вторая позиция недели у «Ижевска» (2000 против «Рубин-2»): это личный рекорд клуба не только в текущем сезоне (прежде максимум был 1055 с «Челябинск-2» 2…

👍27❤7👏6🔥6👌2

Signed Stanislav Chudin

4 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC≈13,300 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1️⃣ Посещаемость 4-го тура Первой лиги: более 9 тысяч зрителей в Туле и полный стадион в Рощино Средняя посещаемость тура — 3508 зр./матч: на 11% выше 3-го тура (3159), в котором был минимум сезона, и на 12% ниже текущей средней сезона (3983). В сравнении с состоянием после 4-го тура прошлого сезона (4891) нынешний идёт с отставанием на 19%. Аудиторию тура вытянули Тула (9312) и Нижний Новгород (8934) — на двоих 58…

❤33👍28🔥12👏6👌1

Signed Stanislav Chudin

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,780 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Посещаемость 3-го тура Второй лиги А-2026/27: снижение на 17%, ни одна игра не собрала более двух тысяч Средняя посещаемость тура — 1027 зр./матч: на 17% ниже 2-го тура (1243) и на 11% ниже текущей средней сезона (1148). После брянского всплеска тур без явных опорных точек: ни одного матча с аудиторией выше двух тысяч (в 1-м туре таких было два, во 2-м — три). Почти одинаковое число болельщиков пришло на футбол …

👍29❤9👌5👏4

Signed Stanislav Chudin

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @football_attendance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@football_attendance edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФНЛ с Ильёвым
@ilyevserg · 33,806
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Вторая лига России по футболу 2023/2024 (дивизион «А») (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…домашних матчей'''{{cite web|lang=ru|url=https://t.me/football_attendance/844|title=Средняя посещаемость домашних матчей клубов…”
read 13 September 2026
Первая лига России по футболу 2023/2024 (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…sortable" |+10 самых посещаемых матчей{{cite web|lang=ru|url=https://t.me/football_attendance/995|title=Самые посещаемые матчи Первой лиги-2023/24|website=t…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Футбольная посещаемость” (@football_attendance), 4,668 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/football_attendance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.