Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Serious Chat

@follictou

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002417906049
TypeChannel
Username@follictou
Descriptionhttps://t.me/venomchatic чат
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 3 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/follictou

Growth

97 August 2026 — 9 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:029no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:469first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5231176909903122679824.2%
❤‍🔥721.2%
515.2%
🐳412.1%
😈412.1%
🤯26.06%
🏆13.03%
👌13.03%
🕊13.03%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2025 to 28 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Feb 2025, 18:16 UTC413 viewsread 12 August 2026

💜💜💜💜💜💜 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 Первые 💜 💜 По 💜💜💜

Signed qveal

10 Feb 2025, 18:15 UTC355 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Раздачу делаем?

custom 52311769099031226794😈2

Signed qveal

9 Feb 2025, 19:38 UTC258 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Давайте реакций и будет еще

❤‍🔥4

Signed qveal

9 Feb 2025, 19:37 UTC231 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ещё одна раздача Первые 4 + по 💜💜

❤‍🔥3

Signed qveal

9 Feb 2025, 19:35 UTC192 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если все пройдет удачно то ждите конкурс и еще раздачи

custom 52311769099031226791

Signed qveal

9 Feb 2025, 19:30 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Раздача от @TheHeroFCB Первые 3 + 💜💜 💜💜

🐳1

Signed qveal

3 Feb 2025, 19:11 UTC206 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @valyutaTG_bot

qveal передал 10000 грамм qvl | NURS (fntm)

🐳3custom 52311769099031226793😈2

Signed qveal

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @follictou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Serious Chat” (@follictou), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/follictou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.