Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

659 FM

@fm_659

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,885subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002483774965
TypeChannel
Username@fm_659
Created29 September 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fm_659

Growth

3,8853,9003,892.57 August 2026 — 3,900 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,897 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,885 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,883–3,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:253,885-12
8 Aug 2026, 19:473,897-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:033,900first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 September 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 54s
Average length
2m 27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

23,231 reactions across 13 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,34631.6%
🔥3,87516.7%
❤‍🔥2,92112.6%
🤯2,46210.6%
😱1,6587.14%
👍1,4266.14%
😎1,2295.29%
🎄4331.86%
🤔3711.60%
😨2641.14%
🍓2511.08%
💘1640.706%
💊1340.577%
💋1120.482%
🌭730.314%
😭690.297%
🍌530.228%
460.198%
👏460.198%
👻440.189%
19 further kinds2541.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2024 to 31 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2024, 21:30 UTC≈17,900 views2,178 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всех с новым годом от нашей радио станции 🎄🎄🎄

1,420🎄425❤‍🔥166💊61🔥33🍓20💋16👍15

27 Dec 2024, 21:00 UTC≈34,700 views1,816 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

HBTY.mp4

😎1,220❤‍🔥360🔥124🤯3923🍓13👍11👏9

14 Oct 2024, 19:56 UTC≈36,500 views1,494 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЗДРАВСТВУЙТЕ ДОРОГИЕ РАДИОСЛУШАТЕЛИ! Знаю, что вы уже отвечали на этот вопрос, но я повторюсь. Как вам наш небольшой интерактивчик?) На связи Драник - Я СОАВТОР ИДЕИ, ОЗВУЧКЕР и создатель части шифров для этого интерактива, а так же гений, миллиардер ну и дальше вы знаете. Мы с нашей небольшой командой готовили для вас много чего, но, к сожалению, не всему удалось сбыться, а значит, надо раскрыть небольшой занавес т

🔥965❤‍🔥216132🤯72💘37👍34💋18🦄7

7 Oct 2024, 16:00 UTC≈39,900 views1,390 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем привет, ребят! Ну что, как вам наш МЕГА ИНТЕРАКТИВ?) Меня зовут ФЭНЭТ - я автор идеи, создатель львиной доли шифров и монтажёр. Хочу поделиться с вами интересными наработками и мыслями по поводу прошедшего интерактива, поскольку рассказать действительно есть что: объяснение шифров, не вошедший материал и прочие ништяки, которые вам обязательно понравятся! Начну с простенького, а именно с НЕ ВОШЕДШЕГО в данный

❤‍🔥972🔥167127😱47👍30🍓16💘15💋7

4 Oct 2024, 18:02 UTC≈45,400 views1,916 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

018.mp3

🤯1,360244😨184🍌35🔥29🍾15😭15💊14

4 Oct 2024, 17:07 UTC≈29,800 views1,509 reactionsread 8 August 2026

HFPUFLFKB DS PFUFLRE PFCFLBKB DS VTYZ CRJHJ DCT EPYF>N GHFDLE JRHSKTY CDJ<JLJQ Z

956🤯287🤔104😭54🔥40🍌18💘13👍10

3 Oct 2024, 21:00 UTC≈23,600 views1,769 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @linchdisasterPhoto

‼️ВНИМАНИЕ!! ВАЖНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ДЛЯ СТУДИИ 659 FM‼️ Ваш пропавший сотрудник Драник является для меня близким другом. Я была шокирована, узнав новость о его мистической пропаже. До сих пор не могу в это поверить... Но пару минут назад, Драник вышел со мной на связь!! Не знаю, что с ним происходит, но он прислал мне это: Привет. Не задавай лишних вопросов, нет времени объяснять! Я скажу тебе сейчас очень важную

🔥1,120🤯335165😱58👍23❤‍🔥17💘16🍓15

3 Oct 2024, 15:40 UTC≈29,700 views1,823 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, друзья, на волне Фэнэт! Я один из сотрудников студии 659 ФМ и, по совместительсву, напарник всеми любимого Драника. Но вот беда, вчера из студии во время вещания, он... пропал! На столе была обнаружена странная коробка со странно-пахнущей едой и какая-то записка. Может, у вас есть варианты куда мог подеваться Драник? Если вы имеете хоть какие-то зацепки, обязательно поделитесь с нами, мы очень переживаем

❤‍🔥1,190😱326173🔥40💘27👍25🍓12💋12

2 Oct 2024, 16:14 UTC≈22,700 views1,924 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, дорогие радиослушатели, на волне Драник! Сегодня к нам в студию пришла посылка от одного из наших слушателей. Нам очень приятно, спасибо за подобные подарки 👋👋👋

👍1,250353🍓123🤔58🔥50👏20💋2018

1 Oct 2024, 14:57 UTC≈36,800 views1,669 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

1,020😱366🔥106🤔63🤷‍♀33💘23🐳20🍓18

30 Sept 2024, 16:48 UTC≈37,200 views2,060 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ХаНеТс4ХиТэВАтЕвСакИчУЛтЕаТаВхЕН,аМьТмоГуРк

1,310🤯369😱133😨80🤔47🔥30💊29👨‍💻28

29 Sept 2024, 17:40 UTC≈42,400 views2,290 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

1,230😱719🔥121🤔89👻44💊30🍓19💋13

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fm_659. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 356,575 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“659 FM” (@fm_659), 3,885 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fm_659.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.