Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ФлутцБергер

@flutzberger

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,468subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001771508332
TypeChannel
Username@flutzberger
Created23 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flutzberger

Growth

8,4688,4818,474.57 August 2026 — 8,481 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,481 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,472 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,468 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,466–8,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:568,468-4
11 Aug 2026, 03:518,472-9
8 Aug 2026, 08:448,481no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:038,481first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21,168 reactions across 20 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15,07371.2%
❤‍🔥1,3706.47%
🥰1,0474.95%
🔥9674.57%
😁9134.31%
👍5652.67%
🤯2251.06%
🤣1860.879%
💅1240.586%
🤩1140.539%
😢1110.524%
550.26%
🍓550.26%
🎉500.236%
🎄430.203%
😍430.203%
👎370.175%
🍾350.165%
👏260.123%
😱250.118%
16 further kinds1040.491%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2022 to 26 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2023, 04:43 UTC≈38,400 views1,528 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Случайно, извините🙏🏻

1,220😁142🤩82🔥28😱12🎉11👍10😍7

24 Feb 2023, 06:43 UTC≈146,000 views1,405 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1,090🤣186👍54🥰25😁17🔥13❤‍🔥8🤡5

25 Jan 2023, 19:35 UTC≈48,900 views1,016 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @markninetyninthVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰739156👍67❤‍🔥28👎12💩74🔥2

4 Jan 2023, 09:19 UTC≈110,000 views1,003 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥724170👍49❤‍🔥25🥰14🤪6💋4🍓3

3 Jan 2023, 08:43 UTC≈48,400 views983 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

774💅103❤‍🔥32👍2720🌭9🥰6🔥5

3 Jan 2023, 07:51 UTC≈45,400 views1,157 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

951❤‍🔥72😍36👍26💅21😁1916🎄8

31 Dec 2022, 22:25 UTC≈37,200 views1,153 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

978🥰66❤‍🔥32👍31🍾18🎄17👎3🔥3

31 Dec 2022, 20:54 UTC≈46,400 views1,966 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1,710🥰74❤‍🔥68👍30🔥27🍾17🎄16👎16

24 Dec 2022, 13:26 UTC≈38,100 views1,191 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

962😢111❤‍🔥59👍425👎3🔥3🥰3

24 Dec 2022, 11:23 UTC≈33,800 views798 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

654🍓46❤‍🔥43😁23👍18🍌4🤯43

24 Dec 2022, 11:22 UTC≈31,700 views809 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

669❤‍🔥62🔥32👍26🤯133🥰3🍌1

24 Dec 2022, 11:17 UTC≈28,700 views1,130 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Флутцбергер жив

❤‍🔥865🤯14054👍27🎉22🔥123💋3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flutzberger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФлутцБергер” (@flutzberger), 8,468 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flutzberger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.