Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آۈاز قوې ׅغم ‌

Channel

آۈاز قوې ׅغم ‌

@flowersbandes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

133subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003885677164
TypeChannel
Username@flowersbandes
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flowersbandes

Growth

13310 Aug 2026, 08:01 — 133 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:27 — 133 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:0110 Aug 2026, 09:27
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:27133no change
10 Aug 2026, 08:01133first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total507
Reactions total81
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋81100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC14 viewsread 10 August 2026

⠀‌ ‌⠀‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌⠀‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌پایانِ چالش ⠀‌ ‌ ‌ ‌۰۵۱۸ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌⠀‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

9 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC21 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

@xvanem آبان مثلِ یه رز داخل شیشه‌ست، می‌ترسی لمسش کنی، اما ساعت‌ها می‌شینی و بهش خیره می‌شی. قلبِ به شدت مهربونی داره که باعث می‌شه حس کنی، خدایا مگه چقدر رفتار یه شخص ‌می‌تونه قلبم رو نرم کنه ؟ هرچند ممکنه یه وقت هایی دلش بخواد فاصله بگیره، بخواد توضیحی نده، و فقط یه مدت خودش باشه. و داخل اون مدت، تصمیم میگیره ببینه کدوم افراد واقعاً کنارش می‌مونن.

💋8

9 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC21 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

@gfoxlow دی شده دلت بستني بخواد داخل یه روز سرد ؟ ممکنه اول همه بگن، وا مگه عقلت کمه. ولي دقیقاً رابطه با دی‌ ماه همینطوریه. همون حس و حالي رو داره که با بقیه نمی‌شه تجربه کرد. رد فلگ و کمي گرین فلگه اما اینکه واقعاً کي باشه رو خودش انتخاب می‌کنه. اون مثل رنگ‌های سردِ، و دوست‌داشتنی ‍ـه. اون از اعماق قلبش می‌خواد و امیدواره که روزي بلخره عشق حقیقي رو پیدا کنه و ادم بهتري بشه.

💋9

9 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC39 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

@Doomedthv مرداد یه نسیم خنکه، که وقتی دلت گرفته ارزو می‌کنی به‌وزه. یه همراه خوب، که داخل سکوتت یهویی تو رو تشخیص می‌ده و بهت می‌گه واقعاً حالت خوبه ؟ اما ایا کسي ازش خودش این رو می‌پرسه ؟ چون ممکنه برخلاف خودش، بقیه نادیده‌اش بگیرن. اون مهربونه ولی مراقبه چطور مهربون باشه. چون قبلاً اسیب دیده، ولي خودش رو محدود نکرد، ولي کمرنگ و کمرنگ تر کرد.

💋7

9 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC20 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

@Errorfourr آبان تو مثل یه دریایی ارومي، که تا کسي بهش صدمه نزنه، بهش موجِ بلند پرتاب نمی‌کنی. چرا ؟ چون فهمیدنِ تو واقعی سخته، و از دست هر کسي هم برنمی‌آمد و براي همین قضاوت می‌شی. ممکنه مردم بگن سردی یا پُرو و طنزي، اما پشت اون نقاب من مطمئنم یه دختر کوچولو نشسته که منتظره یکي بیاد بغلش کنه و اشك‌هاشو پاك کنه.

💋8

9 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC26 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

@kim_7Thv شهریور یه سکوت داخل ساعت گرگ و میشِ صبح ‍ـه. از اون دسته افرادي هستن که واقعاً دلت می‌خواد باهاشون وقت بگذرونی، اما خب همه قراره اون رو دوست داشته باشن ؟ قطعاً نه. اون ممکنه به شدت افکار و روش متفاوتي برای خودش داشته باشه، یه جلدِ به شدت قوي که فقط خودش جلدِ واقعی بودنش رو دیده. اون با پایانش یه شروع جدید رو داره، پس اگه باهاش رابطه داشته باشي و جدا بشي، قطعاً نمی‌شه به راحتي فراموشش کرد.

💋8

9 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC21 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

@vanilliye آبان همون‌طور که توي اکثر مواقع گفته شده، ماهِ عوض شدنه. اون ممکنه یهو رابطه‌تون رو تغییر بده و تو اصلأ موقعیت فکر کردن هم نداشته باشي، اما در حقیقت اون یك کار ساده و ریزي که دوست نداشته رو، براي خودش بولد کرده و خواسته راهش رو ازت جدا کنه. چرا از قشنگي این ماه نگیم، که هرکسي ابان ماهیه، مثل ماه تو اسمون می‌درخشه. کمي پراعتمادبنفسه، و گاهي هم اصلأ خودش رو نمی‌خواد. توي بالا و پایین شدن احساساتش، حریف نداره

💋8

9 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC28 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

@sweticre خرداد از جنسِ گذر کردن مثل یه باد بهاریه. اون گاهي سرخه و گاهي سفید. قرار نیست همیشه اون رو بفهمي، چون اون هم همیشه توضیح نمی‌ده. از اون دسته نیست که زیاد داد بزنه و خودش رو داخل هر جمعي قرار بده. ممکنه گاهي نگاهش بهت پُر از علاقه باشه، و گاهي سردِ سرد، که بدنت رو بلرزونه. اما همه این‌ها بستگی به این داره که تو، رو دوست داره یا نه.

💋8

9 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC43 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

@mydailystarliv بهمن یه بخش عمیق داره از خودش که به هرکسي نشون نمی‌ده. یه لایه محافظي داره، نه از جنس یخ بله از شیشهِ نازك، چون وقتي بتونی دلش رو به دست بیاري اون شیشه اروم اروم می‌شکنه و می‌ره. اون یه مراقبِ بامزه‌ست، و همراه دوست داشتنی. ممکنه اون رو زیادي اروم ببینی، اما اون همیشه درونش پر از شیطنت و بامزگي هست.

💋9

9 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC20 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

⠀‌ ‌⠀‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌⠀‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌جوابِ چالش ⠀‌ ‌ ‌ ‌۰۵۱۸ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌⠀‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

💋8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flowersbandes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 699,556 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آۈاز قوې ׅغم ‌” (@flowersbandes), 133 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flowersbandes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.