کانال تخصصی روان شناسی pinned «گروهدرمانی دلبستگیمحور با هدایت محمد یزدانی این گروه برای افرادی طراحی شده است که نمیتوانند نوبت درمان فردی بگیرند و میخواهند در یک فضای گروهی امن و حمایتی، روی الگوهای رابطهای و هیجانی خود کار کنند. ساختار گروه و جلسات: گروه بسته، ۸ تا ۱۰ نفر ۱۰ جلسه…»

Channel
کانال تخصصی روان شناسی
@flourishingcenter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,661subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001053699493 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flourishingcenter |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flourishingcenter |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 6,661 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 6,656 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 6,658 | +18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 6,640 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 6,640 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 November 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.9%
- avg views ÷ 6,661 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 794
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 November 2020 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 794 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 08s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
184 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 131 | 71.2% | |
| 🙏 | 28 | 15.2% | |
| 😍 | 15 | 8.15% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.09% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.543% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.543% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.543% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.543% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2020 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
گروهدرمانی دلبستگیمحور با هدایت محمد یزدانی این گروه برای افرادی طراحی شده است که نمیتوانند نوبت درمان فردی بگیرند و میخواهند در یک فضای گروهی امن و حمایتی، روی الگوهای رابطهای و هیجانی خود کار کنند. ساختار گروه و جلسات: گروه بسته، ۸ تا ۱۰ نفر ۱۰ جلسه ۹۰ دقیقهای آنلاین و زنده (گوگل میت) شامل گفتوگو، تمرین عملی و پاسخ به سؤالات تعهد کامل به حضور و محرمانگی الزامی است زمان جلسات: چهارشنبهها ساعت ۲۰:۰۰ به وقت…
کانال تخصصی روان شناسی pinned Deleted message
موسیقی بی کلام گوارای وجودتان ❤️
👍7🙏3
بعضی مردها یه عمر جنگیدن، با خودشون، با توقعها، با فشار بیصدا بودن. بلند شدن، ساختن، دویدن... ولی خیلی وقتها یه چیزی ته دلشون خالی مونده: «کسی منو واقعاً میبینه؟ کسی قدردان این همه دویدن هست؟» مردی که تحسین میشه، نه فقط بابت موفقیتهاش، بلکه برای خودِ خودش— برای وقتی میترسه ولی باز ادامه میده، برای وقتی خستهست ولی میمونه، برای وقتی نمیدونه ولی تلاش میکنه بفهمه— یه جور دیگه زندگی میکنه. تحسین شدن برای مرده…
👍31🙏2💘1
Channel name was changed to «کانال تخصصی روان شناسی»
🍁 رنج اگر عمیق باشه یعنی مداوم، پرتکرار و ریشه دار باشه تو باورش میکنی یه اون خو میگیری مثل یه حباب از جنس نا امنی، قربانی بودن، خواستنی نبودن، مهم نبودن نادیده گرفته شدن، طرد شدن، کافی نبودن، بی ارزشی، مقصر بودن و.. حتی وقتایی که همه چیز امن یا نسبتا امنه تو از داخل اون حباب نگاه میکنی چون امنیت برات آشنا نیست چون همه اتفاقات از لنز حباب نا امن تو عبور میکنه میشه گفت تو اون شرایط امن این تویی که رنجی میسازی چو…
👍29😍5
🍁 هر هفته قسمتی از کتاب تقصیر تو نبود (رهایی از شرم ناشی از سو استفاده در دوران کودکی با نیروی شفقت با خود) به قلم بورلی انگل و ترجمه سروه ویسی و خدیجه نادری زاده از انتشارات ارجمند با صدای مجتبی شکوری تحت عنوان پادکست "رود" برا شما عزیزان ارسال میشود. بخش چهارم خودفهمی ✅ @FlourishingCenter 🆔 instagram.com/_mohamad_yazdani
🙏8👍2
🍁 نادر ابراهیمی تو نامهای به همسرش مینویسه: عزیز من اگر زاویه دیدمان نسبت به چیزی یکی نیست، بگذار یکی نباشد، بگذار فرق داشته باشیم. بگذار در عین وحدت، مستقل باشیم. بخواه که در عین یکی بودن، یکی نباشیم. بخواه که همدیگر را کامل کنیم، نه ناپدید. بعضی دیالوگها چند خط نیستند چند فصل کتاب اند. #محمد_یزدانی #رواندرمانگر #روابط_عاطفی #رابطه #رابطه_عاطفی #زوج #زوج_درمانی #دلبستگی #پذیرش #اکت ✅ @FlourishingCenter 🆔 in…
👍14😍8🍓1🤣1
🍁 هر هفته قسمتی از کتاب تقصیر تو نبود (رهایی از شرم ناشی از سو استفاده در دوران کودکی با نیروی شفقت با خود) به قلم بورلی انگل و ترجمه سروه ویسی و خدیجه نادری زاده از انتشارات ارجمند با صدای مجتبی شکوری تحت عنوان پادکست "رود" برا شما عزیزان ارسال میشود. بخش سوم ✅ @FlourishingCenter 🆔 instagram.com/_mohamad_yazdani
👍4🙏3
🍁 هر هفته قسمتی از کتاب تقصیر تو نبود (رهایی از شرم ناشی از سو استفاده در دوران کودکی با نیروی شفقت با خود) به قلم بورلی انگل و ترجمه سروه ویسی و خدیجه نادری زاده از انتشارات ارجمند با صدای مجتبی شکوری تحت عنوان پادکست "رود" برا شما عزیزان ارسال میشود. بخش دوم (درباره شرم) ✅ @FlourishingCenter 🆔 instagram.com/_mohamad_yazdani
🙏6
🍁 فکر میکنم همه ما این تجربه رو داشتیم که خیلی به هم ریخته و آشفته باشیم و یک نفر تونسته باشه تو اون شرایط سخت ما رو آروم کنه و انگار که از یه "چاهی" ما رو بیرون کشیده باشه. میدونم تجربش کردین و حس خیلی خوبی داره. ولی واقعا چرا بعضی آدما این قدرت رو دارن یا حتی چرا هر کدوم از ما سراغ افراد متفاوتی میریم. واقعیت اینه که این تجربه خیلی مواقع به ما احساس امنیت میده. و اینطور افراد به خاطر فهم خوبشون از ما انگار …
👍15😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flourishingcenter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,436,392 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال تخصصی روان شناسی” (@flourishingcenter), 6,661 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flourishingcenter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.