𝔇𝙸𝚅𝚄𝙻𝙶𝙰𝙽𝙳𝙾 🦢 𝙿𖹭𝙻𝙰𝚁𝙾𝙸𝙳𝙴𝚂, 𝗆𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗳𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗮𝗿 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌! 𝓒𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈 𝗈 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂çã𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝗶çã𝗼 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾 é 𝗼𝗿𝗴â𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗼. 𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗃𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺. 🍓 🦢 𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗴𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗶. 🕊 🦢 𝖩á 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺. 💘 🦢 𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂 𝖾𝗆 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝗶çã𝗼. …

Channel
𝙵𝙻𝙾𝚁𝙴𝙰𝚁𝚃𝙴 ⋆ 𝓼𝚃𝙸𝙲𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂.
@florearte
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,064subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001890423358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @florearte |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/florearte |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 2,064 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 2,063 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 2,063 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.3%
- avg views ÷ 2,064 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 316
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,314 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
* 📸 ، 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖽 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗉𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗋𝘰𝗆 #hollywood, 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗄𝓼 𝖻𝗒 ꢁ #sadiesink!
Sticker, posted without a caption
* 📸 ، 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖽 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗉𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗋𝘰𝗆 #instagram, 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗄𝓼 𝖻𝗒 ꢁ #faemargaux!
* 📸 ، 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖽 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗉𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗋𝘰𝗆 #instagram, 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗄𝓼 𝖻𝗒 ꢁ #jasminetookes!
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
* 📸 ، 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖽 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗉𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗋𝘰𝗆 #instagram, 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗄𝓼 𝖻𝗒 ꢁ #yastanaka!
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @florearte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 803,477 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ 𝙵𝙻𝙾𝚁𝙴𝙰𝚁𝚃𝙴 ⋆ 𝓼𝚃𝙸𝙲𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂.” (@florearte), 2,064 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/florearte.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.